Microsoft Goes Full KKK—Limits Number of White and Asian Employees

American corporations have become affiliates and financial supporters of racism in America.  If you are white or Asian, do not apply for a job at Microsoft.  They do not want you.  While Bill Gates is trying to push us into the Fascism of 2022, his company has made it clear they would have been on the side of the Confederacy in 1861.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!


“The Microsoft Research Ph.D. Fellowship allows participating universities to nominate up to four students annually. “At least two” of those four nominees, per Microsoft’s provisions, should “self-identify as a woman, African American, Black, Hispanic, Latinx, Native American, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Indigenous Peoples, LGBTQI+, active or veteran service member, and/or person with a disability.”

It is illegal for companies to enter into contracts based on race under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits federally funded universities from discriminating based on race. The Microsoft fellowship likely violates both laws, according to Gail Heriot, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and a law professor at the University of San Diego.

It is obvious that Bill gates has mental problems—after all he is white and his company could not hire him.  If you love racism buy Microsoft products.

A Microsoft Fellowship Caps the Number of White and Asian Applicants. Lawyers Say That’s Illegal.

Aaron Siberium, Washington Free Beacon,  9/8/22 

It’s not just Google. Microsoft is capping the number of white and Asian students that universities can nominate for a prestigious research fellowship that includes a generous $42,000 stipend, part of a pattern of discriminatory policies sweeping corporate America.

The Microsoft Research Ph.D. Fellowship allows participating universities to nominate up to four students annually. “At least two” of those four nominees, per Microsoft’s provisions, should “self-identify as a woman, African American, Black, Hispanic, Latinx, Native American, Alaska Native, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, Indigenous Peoples, LGBTQI+, active or veteran service member, and/or person with a disability.”

It is illegal for companies to enter into contracts based on race under the Civil Rights Act of 1866, and Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits federally funded universities from discriminating based on race. The Microsoft fellowship likely violates both laws, according to Gail Heriot, a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights and a law professor at the University of San Diego.

A Microsoft spokesman, Rhoades Clark, declined to comment, telling the Washington Free Beacon that Microsoft “has nothing to share.”

Until recently, IBM’s Ph.D. Fellowship Rewards Program used similar criteria. That program, which also allows four applicants per school, required that half of each university’s nominations go to “diversity candidates or underrepresented populations in technology.”

But 24 hours after the Free Beacon contacted IBM for comment, the company scrubbed the quota-like language from its website, which now stipulates that schools “consider a diverse slate of candidates for the program.” IBM did not respond to a request for comment.

The fellowships reflect the race-conscious consensus that has taken hold of Silicon Valley, where ostensible corporate competitors increasingly mimic each other’s policies. Like Microsoft and IBM, Google caps the number of white and Asian men that universities can nominate for a Ph.D. fellowship, using language almost identical to Microsoft’s. “If a university chooses to nominate more than two students,” Google says, “the third and fourth nominees must self-identify as a woman, Black / African descent, Hispanic / Latino / Latinx, Indigenous, and/or a person with a disability.”

That criterion has been in place since at least April 2020, according to an archived webpage. It is not clear when Microsoft and IBM adopted their criteria.

Nearly every elite university in the country has nominated students for one of the fellowships and some, like Columbia University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, have nominated students for all three. Though universities are unlikely to lose federal funding over the fellowships, they could face lawsuits or civil rights investigations.

So could the companies themselves. Since the programs are not unconditional grants—fellows must remain in their Ph.D. program for the duration of the fellowships—courts would probably treat them as contracts, said Dan Morenoff, the executive director of the American Civil Rights Project. That would expose Microsoft, Google, and IBM to liability under the 1866 Civil Rights Act, the law banning race discrimination in contracting.

Other tech companies are already facing such lawsuits. In July, a white woman filed a class action complaint against Amazon over a program that gives “Black, Latinx, and Native American entrepreneurs” $10,000 dollar stipends to launch delivery startups. The program violates the 1866 Civil Rights Act, the lawsuit argues, because whites and Asians are ineligible for the stipends.

“Every morning you wake up to hear a new story about a corporation ignoring the law,” Heriot said. “They have to start being held accountable.”

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.

Comments

  1. UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

  2. This has nothing to do with Gates. He’s not involved in these decisions. However, it is true he has gone radical loopy over the last few years. It seems becoming quite wealthy brings out the guilt in all of these people. While they were capitalists to the core as they advanced their businesses, once they get to the top they go full COMMUNIST.

    Gates is a full-on megalomaniac. He wants to control everything in our lives. What you eat. How you live. How you travel (or don’t). What energy resources you use. What medicines you use. Whether or not you have a vehicle. How you power that vehicle. Whether or not you have a house, or are relegated to communal living. What size that abode is. Where it is. How you heat it, or don’t. How you cool it, or don’t. He wants to control your education. On and on.

    You can bet he won’t be changing his lifestyle to match what he thinks you should take up.

    The world will be so much better off when Gates, and his moron of an ex wife, both join Queen Elizabeth, wherever she is.

  3. It is the Democrat woke identity politics.

    Pure and simple it is not about ability or production.

    As such it will the the demise of the company.

Speak Your Mind

*