Obama to Create “Group Home/Prison” for His Young Illegal Aliens in Escondido

The people of Escondido are about to be invaded with criminals from foreign countries, sent to them by the President of the United States. A former hospital, closed due to low ObamaCare reimbursements, is being transformed into either a prison or a group home. Of course, once Barack drops them off in Northern San Diego County nothing stops them from walking away and into the shadows of our large towns nearby.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

In Baltimore the Democrat leadership stopped Obama from using Social Security warehouses for 2,000 illegal aliens. Virginia was able to stop several hundred moving into a closed college. Now the people of Escondido are about to start a fight to keep crime down, taxes used for honest people and telling the President to obey his oath of office. Larry and Kitty Demry of Escondido contacted me about this situation and asked for help—we will provide assistance. This could be done to your neighborhood or town.

California Prisons

Obama to Create “Group Home/Prison” for His Young Illegal Aliens in Escondido

 

Written Exclusively for the California Political News and Views by Larry & Kitty Demry

6/19/14

 

With a variety of articles now starting to pop up around the U.S. it is clear to me that our federal government e.g. the Department of Health & Human Services lacks the desire or integrity to tell citizens about the true problem emerging regarding the illegal children unaccompanied by parents or adults coming into our country. And that means in YOUR backyard, in YOUR city, on your street where you live and raise your family.

In fact, in my city, Escondido, CA just a few days after reading different articles starting to recognize the housing problems of these illegal crossings, I became aware the defunct Palomar Hospital run long-term health care facility within .5 miles of my home is being considered by the City of Escondido Planning Department for a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for Government Services to operate an “unaccompanied youth care facility serving minors between 6 and 17 years of age.” The public hearing notice goes on to say that these youth will be kept inside the facility with “six-foot-high security fencing.”  These are the same kids who are coming across our borders with what type of fencing and other deterrents to protect the border in place? The city has graciously stated they will not use concertina wire, just decorative wrought iron. Of course, with the use of concertina wire we all would know that these facilities are truly to detain and imprison children and youth illegally in our country. Folks, this is not some esoteric philosophical ideal that we can tout to make everyone and ourselves feel good to help these children in other countries. This is a political issue that is having direct impact on all of us; a direct impact on our families, and our personal day to day lives in the towns in which we live.

Read between the lines. The City of Escondido is being petitioned by the Department of Human Services to become a detention center, or an incarceration camp, or perhaps described as an open door group home so that children between the age of 6 and 17 who have crossed into the United States illegally, without their parents, will have a place to “be processed” into the U.S. And the city of Escondido will have to bear the financial costs of society issues that are a result of this detention center. Crime. Education. Medical. Social and Recreational events. Breakdown of infrastructure from excessive unplanned use. Where is this money coming from? How does it affect you? No one can tell us the background of these children. Are they bringing disease such as small pox, measles, mumps, polio, etc. into the community as a result of poor medical care and lacking inoculations? Could your children be at medical risk when these children are bused into your children’s schools for 2 weeks to 2 months while being held in a local detention center in your area? Are they teen age gang members who will be emboldened to commit crimes because they see no consequence to breaking the law to enter our country? How will you feel if your wife, your mother, your daughter, your neighbor, your friend is a victim of violent crime, robbery, rape, even murder because you did nothing when the building down your street was conditionally permitted to be used as a temporary prison with only a six foot wrought iron fence to keep these “unaccompanied youth” housed and controlled?

Are city governments being coerced to approve these facilities, without proper State and local laws being followed. For example, the property must be properly designated with the State to be called a health care facility, or a group home, or an incarceration facility. If the current ​facility ​designation needs to be changed, the State requires specific steps be taken to legally change the facility designation, and put the proper channels in place to make sure the designated facility follows the laws in terms of number of children staying in the facility, how they get exercise, where they get exercise, their education needs, the noise they make and the times the noise is allowed, the times the facility is open to bus in and out the rotating groups of children. Here in Escondido, the “unaccompanied youth” will be brought to and from the 96 bed facility any time between 7 AM and 9 PM daily. Daily. 7 days a week.

Transparency was promised in this current presidential administration. These sweetheart deals to play hide seek with illegal immigrants are not transparent. These facilities are being pushed through city approvals, without truthfully or legally taking the steps to make sure California laws and other state laws are followed.

​That means​ ​the for-profit organizations running these detention centers for Human Services ​don’t have to ​follow laws on occupancy, noise, crime deterrence, education, recreation, and medical attention for these children because there is no one designated to oversee their operation.​

This deal is bad for us and our cities, and this deal is bad for these kids. Be aware. Be involved. Attend any city meetings open to the public where a Government Services agency like HHS or their contracted organization like “Southwest Key Program” wants to move into your residential neighborhood. Ask your City government to deny permits unless the EIR,  Police Department Crime Report, City Traffic Report, Education Cost reimbursement plan; Report from your mayor on how expenses will be reimbursed for all associated costs in the City to deal with the implementation of the new detention center, Plan for compensation from the City for dedrogated  property values in your area and specifically how violent crime against your family will be addressed if need be.

If you live in Escondido and can come to this planning meeting to find out what is being planned for your back yard, please do so. Escondido Planning Commission at City Hall 7 PM. June 24, 2014.

 

Larry & Kitty Demry

 

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.

Comments

  1. And just what in hell is wrong with loading them on buses and delivering them to Mexico from whence they came…. They are not our problem and we should not be taking them under or wing….
    But, if any of you are interested and wonder where all of this came from go to the library and check out the book ‘Rules for Radicals’ and read it. This is the Obama Bible and it is also the model for the Piven/Cloward writings on ‘How to Destroy a Government’.
    Wake up people we are being turned into a third world country one step at a time….
    Soon we will be easy pickins for the Muslims within our borders and then we will be in more trouble that any country in Europe….

  2. AND THE PEOPLE RUNNING THIS BURG ARE ACTUALLY CONSIDERING THIS!!!!!!!!!

  3. Annabel Leasowe says

    Algore could take half of them to live in his many, massive carbon footprint estates.
    Perhaps they should be sent to New York City, the Hamptons, Martha’s Vineyard or one of the Clinton’s homes. That would wake a few people up. As the saying goes ‘A liberal is someone whose interests are not at stake at the moment’.

    • Annabel, I was born and raised in NYC and I am against all this going on. Not everyone from NYC sits on a high horse. I can’t speak for those in the Hamptons. Their reputation precedes them for the most part.

    • Just send them to all who encouraged them to come
      In the first place…. Right in their front yards !

      • I believe there is some general encouragement coming from the Statue of Liberty. Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, yeh?

        • voltaire says

          The huddled masses that came to the Statue of Liberty were holding their legal status authorization on their hands before they took the ships to come here and when they landed they had to pass medical tests or be send back.

      • They’re getting some encouragement from The Statue of Liberty among other things. “Give me your tired, your poor,
        Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, yeh?

  4. First, you call it a “prison” and then complain that the wrought iron gates are not good enough protection. So which is it–a prison or an open-door residence? And for your information, there are varying levels of group homes, depending on the type of kids they are detaining. Older boys are not to be housed with young, little girls. Children with serious mental health issues will most likely be weeded out and put into more restrictive settings where their behaviors can be more easily handled. And, as usual, no alternative plan is even suggested, unless its “send ’em all back to where they came from.” This might actually be what we need to do eventually, but there has to be a plan on how to do it. What is suggested by any of the naysayers? Do nothing at all and let them roam the cities and streets? Unfed? Uneducated? Waiting to be victimized by sex peddlers? I bet most of the people who are horrified that we would try and actually help unchaperoned children and place them in a safe haven where they can be cared for until a better placement can be found, go to church every Sunday and parade themselves around as Christians, thumping the Bible and wearing an American Flag on their chest as though it is the Shroud of Turin. Are there issues regarding the costs? Yes. Does there need to be better security at the borders? Yes. But don’t lay your hatred and paranoia on the children who are force marched across the Mexico because their parents are hoping for a better life for them. So much for “Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of heaven.” And I bet those who disagree with me are the first to shout out how America was founded on Christian principles. Well, for once, I would like some of you to actually prove it.

    • Mackenzie says

      You make a very very good point. But I think the majority of people are seeing the end result as to what has happened in the past when we help other countries.. To care for the amount of people that they are suggesting and to have them put these children in this area would be detrimental to this particular area. We already have an over populated gang area. What happens when these children want out. They want to be free of the prison or so called prison of the old Palomar Hospital? They will be right in the middle of what EPD is already having a hard time controlling.. So who’s going to pay for that? My family does.. Our taxes go up.. Our town pays for the police.. We pay for the hospital.. We pay for the people who have to guard them.. Why would it be fair to put the burden solely on us.. It doesn’t matter if we believe Jesus is our savior or if Budda is.. What is right and wrong is staring us in the face. These children should not have to suffer. Nor should we!! You asked for some people to come up with a better plan.. Those children would be way better in a smaller city not one with gang and drug problems every night of the week.. Not to mention drive bys during the week in the morning.. I haven’t even gotten started on the other areas of impact it will have. As a recap.. Yes these children need help, but our town is not the town for these children.. Putting these children in a highly populated town will only make it harder for them to succeed. So what is Obama really trying to accomish?

    • Well said.

    • Frances:
      I would remind you that in order for these children to transverse a country the size of Mexico from central America they would have to have had help and money-they were NOT FORCED they came willingly-financial help coming from likely the Mexican government as well as their own and in all likelihood our administration. If the federal government wants to place these children in the states then it would seem that transporting them to Washington DC so they can be close to the politicians that believe this is the most humane thing to do is the best course of action. It is not the responsibility of the residents of local communities to provide for them. The tragedy is that the parents of these kids believe that coming to the US is a free lunch for heath care, education, food and housing- in case you missed it we pay for these services thru our taxes. I believe that I can speak for many of my neighbors that additional financial burdens whether it be here in Escondido or some other main street USA is not our problem or responsibility. You accusation that church going people /Christians will be the most opposed to this illegal move by the federal government only exemplifies your ignorance on what the Founding fathers meant by America being a country of immigrants.

      • Amen Right on !

      • What does it matter if the children came willingly or not? They are children, they’re following someone- family or coyote, looking for a better life, whatever. Is their willingness supposed to make them criminal? They’re crossing a border looking for a better place to live, that doesn’t make them gangster kids or druggies or master thieves. It makes them human. Most of their parents are not coming here looking for a free lunch either. They’re looking for a safer place that gives them a better chance to buy lunch. This country is an easier place to survive than Mexico right now.

      • I think their problems are a bit bigger than the inconvenience they’d cause us.

    • I am ashamed that I live in an area that is so hardhearted and certainly, posting a picture of prison inmates to represent what this really is, is an abomination! How about caring for our fellow man (in this case children who most likely were brought here for a chance at a better life– not by their choice!)? What does this say about our own values for the short time we have on this earth. Yes, Francis, we are losing our perspective and lashing out because they ‘might’ inconvenience us. I for one hope that we can open our hearts and not with an angry hateful tone.

  5. Thank You for writing about this, it is completely unacceptable. There needs to be more coverage on this issue. I am unable to find any additional information on the plans for Escondido, the proposed facility is literally my backyard.

  6. Just one point, the hospital allegedly under consideration is not defunct because of low “Obamacare reimbursements”, it is still being used for maternity, outpatient surgery, and urgent care. The main hospital closed due to being too expensive to retrofit for current earthquake codes. A brand new state of the art hospital was built and opened last year, please get your facts straight. Don’t make up stuff to prove your point. Makes me wonder about the truth of this whole article, I will have to investigate for myself.

  7. Escondido taxpayer says

    I live a few doors down from this place. Obama has announced $350 million just for 2014 to house these illegal children. For that amount of money I could send them home in private jets and limosines. It is an abuse of the taxpayers. If we want to rescue children, let’s go scoop them out of the Ukraine and Syria and Iraq. To only allow Hispanics in, simply to reward that they broke our laws, is racist. Let’s friggin charter a fleet of jets and go get everybody!

    • Tell you city fathers to “just say no” to this proposal. Show up in huge numbers. They look at everyone as voters!

    • voltaire says

      That’s a good point… a very good point. Where is the “diversity” and “multiculturalism” when it comes to invading illegals? Plenty children are trying to escape violence from Iraq, Gaza, Lybia, Ukraine. It is discriminatory to use tax payers money only in … Central Americans.

  8. html mencken says

    Yes, it is the old Palomar Continuing Care Center. Yes, the plan to use it for housing immigrants is real. BUT, PCCC did not close as a result of “old Obamacare reimbursements”. I am familiar with the reasons for its closure – a myriad of them with some dating well before Obama. It had absolutely nothing to do with what you stated.

    When you include such blatant, irresponsible falsehoods like that, you cheapen and degrade your argument regarding the proposed plans.

  9. This article has no credibility! Palomar hospital is not closed!!! My friend just had a baby there twin two weeks ago! Wow, Palomar also just opened a brand new multi million dollar hospital across town….whether or not this place is set to be housing for illegals is completely suspect due to the complete incompetency of the author…. I drive by the hospital everyday and it is open, why lie and say it’s closed???

  10. At least some of this is a lie… People, get your facts.

    Palomar medical center in Escondido did NOT close down, and certainly not due to obamacare. Most of the center has been relocated to a larger, nicer facility (brand new and beautiful!) closer to the edge of town. This building still functions for some out patient surgery and ER.

    So… Perhaps there is some validity in this article, but at least part of it is total BS.

    Also, government can’t “force” a city to do this. It could pay a decent amount though, at which point a city would weigh the pros and cons.

  11. Escondido taxpayer says

    Bad news for the neighborhood. Apparently Southwest was originally looking at an Escondido hotel for this illegal shelter. But it was in the city’s redevelopment area so the city didn’t want it there. So it was the city itself that sent Southwest Key to the Avenida Del Diablo site. Escondido is politically vile and corrupt. Everything is done with secret deals by one political insider with another political insider. The public hearing is a sham, the deal is done.

Trackbacks

  1. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on [READ MORE […]

  2. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  3. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term […]

  4. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  5. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  6. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  7. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  8. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  9. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  10. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  11. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  12. […] Escondido, a town in northeast San Diego county, residents Larry and Kitty Demry shared on June 19 with California Political Review, “the defunct, Palomar Hospital-run, long-term health […]

  13. […] operate an “unaccompanied youth care facility serving minors between 6 and 17 years of age,”” according to of local residents Larry and Kitty Demry. The Demrys also note that the city would be expected to […]

  14. […] an example of what was being used to whip up hatred in the […]

Speak Your Mind

*