Taxpayers Are Footing Bill for Solar Project That Doesn’t Work

I know my readers are all rich and love to give away money.  Here is another Waste of the Week candidate, again using the Al Gore scam as the reason for the theft of your tax dollars.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!


This is a project in the Mojave Desert—costs too much to build, costs too much to use and then wants tax dollars to pay off loans.  Corruption? Nope, just how crony capitalism works.  Angry yet?  Why not?

Ivanpah solar energy

Taxpayers Are Footing Bill for Solar Project That Doesn’t Work

David Kreutzer, Daily Signal, 3/29/16  

David Kreutzer is the senior research fellow in energy economics and climate change at The Heritage Foundation’s Center for Data Analysis. In this position, Kreutzer researches how energy and climate change legislation will affect economic activity at the national, local, and industry levels. Read his research.

As every 10-year-old who ever got a sweater for a birthday present has been told, “it’s the thought that counts.” That seems to be the guiding principle at the Department of Energy and the California Public Utilities Commission when it comes to solar power.

The latest example is the $2.2 billion Ivanpah solar thermal plant in California. (Note: Solar thermal plants do not use solar panels to directly convert sunshine to electricity; they use sunshine to boil water that then drives conventional turbines.)

Here’s the story so far. Ivanpah…

  • is owned by Google, NRG Energy, and Brightsource, who have a market cap in excess of $500 billion.
  • received $1.6 billion in loan guarantees from the Department of Energy.
  • is paid four to five times as much per megawatt-hour as natural gas-powered plants.
  • is paid two to three times as much per megawatt-hour as other solar power producers.
  • has burned thousands of birds to death.
  • has delayed loan repayments.
  • is seeking over $500 million in grants to help pay off the guaranteed loans.
  • burns natural gas for 4.5 hours each morning to get its mojo going.

Brightsource, which is privately held, is owned by a virtual who’s who of those who don’t need subsidies from taxpayers and ratepayers.

In spite of all this, Ivanpah has fallen woefully short of its production targets. The managers’ explanation for why production came up 32 percent below expected output is the weather. In addition to raising questions about planning for uncertainty, it is not all that clear how a nine-percent drop in sunshine causes a 32-percent drop in production.

More bizarrely, the natural gas used to get the plant all warmed up and ready each day would be enough to generate over one quarter of the power actually produced from the solar energy. Sorry, let’s not be haters.

The problem for Ivanpah’s customers (California power utilities) is that they planned on all those solar watt-hours to meet California’s renewable power mandates, which require that renewables produce a large and rising fraction of California’s electricity. That is why they pay so much more for Ivanpah’s output than for conventionally powered electricity.

Breaching their contracts with these California utilities threatened to shut down Ivanpah. More likely than permanently shutting Ivanpah down would have been a change of ownership at a price that came closer to reflecting reality.

But this would have been bothersome for Ivanpah’s investors and the Department of Energy’s ridiculous Section 1703 Loan Program, so the California Public Utilities Commission saved the day (for the fat-cat owners, of course, not for actual the electricity consumers) by granting the company an extension to meet the production targets.

The best part of the ruling is the section on the cost—it’s pretty succinct.

Here it is in its entirety:

But hey, Ivanpah’s plant is a shiny new technological marvel. That’s what counts, right?

About Stephen Frank

Stephen Frank is the publisher and editor of California Political News and Views. He speaks all over California and appears as a guest on several radio shows each week. He has also served as a guest host on radio talk shows. He is a fulltime political consultant.


  1. Really??? says

    The Democrats have decided that the coastal communities will have to have renewable energy. That most of their cities will run on this alternative energy and are shutting down peaker plants and natural gas electrical plants. They cannot produce enough electricity at a price point that will not cause massive inflation.

    Sounds a lot like their transportation planning that depends on a minimum of $3.50 a gallon gas and prefer $5.00 a gallon gas to force you out of your automobile.

    God has to love them because even their own Mothers are getting fed up with this stupid policy. Green=inflation and poverty.

  2. Wholesale solar will never be a viable option because of cost and reliability. On the other hand it’s costs are a lot more reasonable at a retail level. If you put solar on your roof and batteries and an inverter in your house you are pretty much covered. If you add a wind generator in the right area you will have all the power you need. People on cruiseing sailboats do it all the time.

Speak Your Mind