Gov.-Elect Newsom’s Tax Reform Plans Will Face Bipartisan Risistance

Gavin newsomGovernor-elect Gavin Newsom says he hopes to amend the California tax code to lessen its dependence on income and capital gains taxes paid by the very rich. Yet the last two serious attempts at tax reform were both dead on arrival, and the political dynamics since their failure appear unchanged or even more unfavorable.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

With the state overdue by historical standards for another recession, Newsom is well aware of the revenue nightmare that is looming. After the Great Recession hit a decade ago, state revenue plunged nearly 20 percent – leading to harsh budget cuts in education, public health and social services. Since income and capital gains taxes generate about two-thirds of state revenue, volatility is common.

The revenue decline a decade ago led then-Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to create a commission that in 2009 recommended slashing taxes on income and capital gains while imposing taxes on broad categories of services including legal work, haircuts and tickets to sports and entertainment events. The goal was a tax code rewrite that was initially revenue-neutral but that could end up creating considerable new revenue because of provisions designed to promote economic growth.

Democrats see income-tax cut as gift to rich

Yet while commission heavyweights like former Treasury Secretary George Shultz and many economists touted the wisdom of the proposal, the commission’s tax-overhaul blueprint was blasted by both parties from the moment it was released.

Democrats said the plan was a giveaway to the rich. Republicans knocked it for expanding government taxation to new areas.

The scheme – dubbed the Parsky plan because Rancho Santa Fe GOP businessman Gerald Parsky chaired the commission – never even came up for a committee hearing.

Six years later, in 2015, state Sen. Robert Hertzberg pushed a similar proposal, but with a twist. Instead of being revenue-neutral, has plan would yield $10 billion in new revenue a year. Yet Hertzberg’s plan was also DOA in the Capitol for the same reasons as Parsky’s.

Now, with the progressive wing in more complete control than ever of Democrats, their antipathy toward the idea of tax relief for the rich may never have been stronger. That was reflected in the recent Sacramento Bee story about Newsom’s interest in revamping the state tax code.

Jessica Bartholow, policy advocate at the Western Center on Law & Poverty, told the Bee that the tax code shouldn’t be changed to help the rich and big business.

“Capital gains is money earned by people who didn’t earn it,” Bartholow said. “If wealthy corporations and people are having an upswing in their interests, then why shouldn’t the poorest people?”

Republicans fear reform would prove bait-and-switch

The strongest voice in support of tax reform the Bee cited was Rob Lapsley, president of the California Business Roundtable. But the basic sentiment conservatives expressed about the Parsky and Hertzberg plans – Sacramento wants to tax even more human activities? – is at least as intense as in 2009 and 2015. There is considerable suspicion that any reform plan would end up as a Trojan horse for much higher taxes.

This is fueled by evidence that Democrats are gearing up for a huge push to hike taxes even though state revenue is at an all-time high. The most high-profile gambit is qualifying a measure for the 2020 ballot that would end Proposition 13 protections against property tax hikes of more than 2 percent a year for commercial and industrial properties.

This tax-hike fervor is already evident in local governments, including some under Republican control. As CalWatchdog reported last month, more than 150 local governments asked voters to raise taxes in the June and November elections. While most of the tax hikes were adopted after campaigns depicting them as crucial to public safety and to maintaining government services, by far the fastest-growing category of local spending is on pension costs, which are predicted to roughly double for California cities from 2015 to 2025.

This article was originally published by


  1. Between the Tax and Spenders in Cali politics scorching the working classes income and the poor forest management practices scorching the landscape I can’t understand why anyone stays there anymore. All the Gold in California is in the hands of the Sacramento Swamp.

  2. Resistance is spelled incorrectly as “Risistance” in the title of the article

  3. Looks like I’m going to have to learn to adapt to the cold…

    This sounds bleak….

  4. Charge the border crosser’s $2 each time they cross the border legally and $10 for each illegal crossing and you can eliminate taxes all together. Charge for both North and South crossings.

  5. Total Pension debt should be shared by pension takers. PERIOD.

  6. There is no way in hell that CA will EVER lower taxes!

  7. Just found by the new Mars lander… more uncounted democrat votes from the midterm elections! Just to make sure that Orange County is now BLUE as the cold north wind… tis gonna get chilly folks.

  8. apparently politicians do not understand why is low. If it was high nobody would invest and if nobody invested the economy would collapse. The reason is was set low in the first place was to encourage people to invest. The same reason govt bonds are taxed low if at all. The govt wants people to buy them

  9. All I can say is they should have elected John Cox but the people of the state either vote on looks or party and use no intelligence when casting their votes. Pathetic politicians run and own CA.

  10. With a reported “over 50%” paying no income tax and receiving a government check every month, no wonder democrats flourish in Taxlifornia. How about closing down the Franchise Tax Board and taxing everybody a simple percentage of their federal tax bill? It would save millions in both the public and private sectors. Accountants, not so much.

Speak Your Mind