Should the LAPD use drones?

As reported by the L.A. Times:

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

For more than three years, a pair of drones donated to the Los Angeles Police Department was locked away, collecting dust after a public outcry over the idea of police using the controversial technology.

Seattle police saw a similar backlash when they wanted to use the devices, grounding their drone program before it even took off. And recently, the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department’s use of a drone has been criticized by activists as well as civilian oversight commissioners who want the agency to stop.

On Tuesday, the LAPD again waded into the heated debate, saying the department wanted to test the use of drones in a one-year pilot program.

Drones have been hailed by law enforcement across the country as a valuable technology that could help find missing hikers or monitor armed suspects without jeopardizing the safety of officers. But efforts to deploy the unmanned aircraft have frequently drawn fierce criticism from privacy advocates or police critics for whom the devices stir Orwellian visions of inappropriate — or illegal — surveillance and fears of military-grade, weaponized drones patrolling the skies. …

Click here to read the full story


  1. The police do NOT need drones. The helicopter does anything a drone can do except spy on people. The only place drones would be useful would be in search and rescue so just give them to the search and rescue teams not the police

  2. The article should be “The Luddites win again.” The only difference between a helicopter and a drone is that it is unmanned. The possibility that a human could be harmed is certainly diminished.

Speak Your Mind