Is the hiring of a sleazy, ethically challenged bigot, Eric Holder good for the State of California? It would be like California demanding Rosie O’Donnell to represent Guv Brown in meetings with President Trump. Not pretty. Holder sold assault weapons to the Mexican drug cartels that killed American border guards—and California is going to pay him a retainer of $25,000 a month. Sick. Importantly is it legal?
“But Mr. Kiley cited a court ruling that said the state Constitution forbids hiring outside consultants for roles that can be carried out “adequately and competently’ by those in the civil service, including work “defending California against federal actions.”
“In light of these facts, I respectfully ask your legal opinion as to whether the 1,592 attorneys and legal staff at the State Attorney General’s Office can perform ‘adequately and competently’ the legal services for which Covington & Burling has been retained by the Legislature,” said the Republican Kiley in his letter.”
Thanks to Attorney General Holder 72% of America’s cops are afraid to stop a potential criminal and ask questions. They are afraid to stop a crime, because if they do THEY, the cops, could wind up on trial—thanks to Eric Holder. Do the Democrats really want an attorney that is hated by law enforcement, distrusted by decent people but loved by bigots and drug dealers?
Not so fast: California Republican says hiring Holder to fight Trump violates state constitution
By Valerie Richardson, The Washington Times, 1/12/17
A California GOP lawmaker is challenging the hiring of former U.S. Attorney Eric Holder to fight the Trump administration, saying it may violate the California Constitution.
Assemblyman Kevin Kiley has asked the California Attorney General’s office to investigate whether legislative Democrats ran afoul of the law by retaining Mr. Holder and his law firm, Covington & Burling, for $25,000 per month to do a job that can be performed by state employees.
Mr. Holder was hired last week by the California legislature, which is controlled by Democrats, as outside counsel to provide advice on “our efforts to resist any attempts to roll back the progress California has made” on issues such as climate change to immigration.
But Mr. Kiley cited a court ruling that said the state Constitution forbids hiring outside consultants for roles that can be carried out “adequately and competently’ by those in the civil service, including work “defending California against federal actions.”
“In light of these facts, I respectfully ask your legal opinion as to whether the 1,592 attorneys and legal staff at the State Attorney General’s Office can perform ‘adequately and competently’ the legal services for which Covington & Burling has been retained by the Legislature,” said the Republican Kiley in his letter.
Assembly Republican Leader Chad Mayes said he supports the inquiry, calling it “certainly appropriate to request a legal opinion as to whether this contract is consistent with state law.”
About Stephen Frank
Speak Your Mind