This is government at its worst. Based on the numbers presented, the California economy lost at least $2 billion, each year, to create a better “climate”. So, how better is the climate? Is it due to the costly energy policy? Note government can only guess if something is better—and then, they do not know why it is better (if it is).
“The analysis found that the state requirement that utilities continually increase the amount of renewable energy they provide has been a “significant” driver in curbing emissions.
The LAO, however, was not able to determine exact figures for how much the cut in emissions is attributable to state law versus other factors, and the agency cited as problematic a lack of specific research that evaluates California climate policy.
The LAO, a nonpartisan advisory agency for the state Legislature, was still able to estimate that in 2018 the requirement that utilities increase their portfolio of renewable energy reduced emissions by “the low tens of millions of tons,” at a cost of an additional $60 to $70 per ton over nonrenewable energy.”
How many jobs have been lost due to this policy? How many folks were forced to leave the State, how many had to close down businesses? Do we know the economic cost to families paying more for energy—and less on food, housing and essentials? How many have been forced into poverty—California has 13 million in poverty.
Why is the media asking these questions and demanding answers?
California Energy Policy Has Reduced Carbon Emissions. By Exactly How Much, Nobody Knows
Kevin Stark, KQED, 1/7/20
The California Legislative Analyst’s Office released a report Monday on how well the state’s energy policies are working in terms of reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
‘In many cases, there’s not a lot of great information evaluating either the suite of policies or a specific policy.’Ross Brown, Legislative Analyst’s Office
The analysis found that the state requirement that utilities continually increase the amount of renewable energy they provide has been a “significant” driver in curbing emissions.
The LAO, however, was not able to determine exact figures for how much the cut in emissions is attributable to state law versus other factors, and the agency cited as problematic a lack of specific research that evaluates California climate policy.
The LAO couldn’t find a robust, peer-reviewed study on the effect of the state’s clean energy requirement for utilities, called the renewables portfolio standard. Instead, the agency’s analysts developed their own estimate based on “back-of-the-envelope” calculations, said Ross Brown, a policy analyst for the LAO.
“In many cases, there’s not a lot of great information evaluating either the suite of policies or a specific policy,” Brown said. “We think that this is an important thing from a public policy perspective, as well as thinking about California as a leader for other jurisdictions.”
Due to the dearth of specific research, the LAO study had to rely heavily on a review of existing academic literature, as well as on data from state agencies and interviews with researchers.
Sponsored
Energy Sector Drives Emissions Reductions
The LAO, a nonpartisan advisory agency for the state Legislature, was still able to estimate that in 2018 the requirement that utilities increase their portfolio of renewable energy reduced emissions by “the low tens of millions of tons,” at a cost of an additional $60 to $70 per ton over nonrenewable energy.
The cost of renewable resources continues to plummet. That lower cost as well as federal policies also played a role in reducing the state’s annual emissions, according to the LAO.
“The electricity sector and specifically the kind of megaresources that we used to provide electricity has been a key driver of the state’s emission reductions over the last number of years,” said Brown.
Since 2006, the state’s annual emissions from the energy sector have dropped by about 40 million metric tons, a reduction of 40%. These big cuts were the primary reason California reached its overall 2020 emissions target four years ahead of schedule.
Meanwhile, California’s power use has remained relatively constant, even as in recent years the state’s economy has grown.
About Stephen Frank
Speak Your Mind