The city’s pension board unanimously approved the record-high annual payment Friday. It’s due July 1.
San Diego’s pension board unanimously approved Friday a record-high $533.2 million annual pension payment for the city due July 1.
The half-billion-dollar payment, which comes with the city facing a large budget deficit of roughly $250 million, is $44 million higher than last year and $35 million higher than the pension system’s actuary had projected last spring.
This is the first time San Diego’s annual payment has ever surpassed $500 million.
The actuary told the pension board Friday that his early projections indicate next year’s payment will be even larger at $547.6 million. But that number could change over the next 12 months, particularly based on the stock market.
Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review
Stock gains shrink the city’s pension debt and its annual payment, because a crucial part of the city’s long-term payoff plan is significant growth in the value of investments made by the pension system.
Because the market has been so volatile lately and because it plays such a key role in the city’s annual payment, the actuary presented positive and negative stock scenarios Friday that showed next year’s payment could range from $517 million to $563 million.
Next year’s payment is tentatively expected to rise primarily because of the final installment of generous multiyear pay raises given to nearly all city workers in 2023.
City officials say the hikes were needed to restore city salaries to competitive levels, but they’ve ballooned the city’s annual pension payment and may continue to do so next year.
General workers are due raises of 5% when the new fiscal year begins July 1, while police and lifeguards are due 4% hikes then. Firefighters will get 3% raises July 1 and another 1% on Jan. 1, 2026.
The raises given before the upcoming fiscal year raised the average annual pay for workers in the city’s pension system by 8.1% in just one year, from $98,045 to $105,953.
The actuary, Gene Kalwarski, didn’t provide a new estimate for what the average annual pay will be after the raises that are slated to kick in this July and next January.
The raises — which also increase the estimated pension payments workers will get once they retire — have boosted the city’s pension debt to a record $3.49 billion.
Kalwarski said that number would be $3.55 billion if the upcoming raises were included. But because the city is making such a large payment this year, he projects the debt will drop to $3.4 billion by next spring.
The city’s pension debt, which is formally known as an unfunded actuarial liability, surpassed $3 billion for the first time in January 2020 and climbed to $3.34 billion in January 2021.
It then fell two years in a row before starting to rise again, to $3.36 billion one year ago and to a record $3.49 billion now.
That amount is based on the pension system having assets and investments with a projected long-term value of $10.32 billion, while facing projected future obligations to retired workers of just under $13.82 billion.
The debt had been projected to drop by $114 million this year but instead rose by $129 million. The pay raises pushed it up $267 million, which was partly mitigated by $26 million from stock gains.
Another factor that increased the debt was a recent deal to create pensions for 204 workers affected by the city’s Proposition B pension cuts, which took effect in 2012 but were later overturned in court.
These workers were hired after Proposition B took effect in July 2012 but were no longer working for the city when pensions were restored in July 2021. Giving them pensions raised the debt by $1.7 million and the annual payment by $600,000.
The agreement leaves only one group of workers still mired in Proposition B controversy: roughly 1,000 police officers who have been denied pension credit for six months they spent in the police academy.
The actuary provided comparisons Friday of San Diego’s pension system against others in California and the nation.


Instead of voting lawyers into office try voting in common sense economists. Just when if ever are California voters going to take responsibility for the tax and spenders they put into office to run their State?
Hey do you think it is time to make sure government employees have to plan for and fund their retirement/medical plans?
There is a concept for you. The average private business cannot afford the gross and obscene benefits of lifer government employee’s …
Time to make sure LIFER politicians do not get government mandated retirement. Want to “serve” the people? Do your own planning.
Term limits, no retirement, no medical…..Getting it yet?
Watch the cost of government sink.