Ex-fire chief files whistleblower suit

Crowley alleges Bass sought to shift blame for the city’s handling of the Palisades fire.

Former Los Angeles Fire Chief Kristin Crowley is suing the city, claiming in a whistleblower lawsuit that Mayor Karen Bass “orchestrated a campaign of retaliation” to protect her own political future and paper over her failures during the most destructive fire in city history.

In the lawsuit, filed Monday in Los Angeles County Superior Court, Crowley and her attorneys allege Bass sought to shift blame for the way the city handled last year’s catastrophic Palisades fire to Crowley amid mounting criticism of the mayor’s decision to attend a ceremony in Ghana on Jan. 7, the day the fire erupted. Bass, the suit alleges, left L.A. despite knowing of the potential severe winds and fire danger.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“She sought to avoid accountability by shifting blame and lying — including falsely claiming that she was not aware of the nationally anticipated weather event, falsely claiming that the LAFD’s budget was not cut, and falsely claiming that LAFD’s resources would have supported an additional 1,000 firefighters to fight the blaze — claims contradicted by public records and Bass’ own prior statements,” the lawsuit alleges. “These false statements were not mistakes but part of a deliberate strategy to divert scrutiny from Bass’ decisions and to avoid accountability.”

The Palisades fire took off the morning of Jan. 7, 2025, amid fierce Santa Ana winds, killing 12 people and destroying thousands of homes amounting to billions of dollars in damage. Although authorities allege a Florida man started the fire, saying it was actually a rekindling of a Jan. 1 fire, decisions by both LAFD brass and the mayor before, during and after Jan. 7 have come under scrutiny.

According to records obtained by The Times, shortly before releasing an after-action report on the Palisades fire, the Los Angeles Fire Department issued a confidential memo detailing plans to protect Bass and others from “reputational harm.” The 13-page document is on LAFD letterhead and includes email addresses for department officials, representatives of Bass’ office, and public relations consultants hired to help shape messaging about the fire.

But as questions about the fire response swirled, instead of getting in lockstep with Bass, Crowley revealed to the public that “budget cuts had weakened the department’s readiness and jeopardized public and firefighter safety” and said her repeated warnings were ignored, the lawsuit says. It alleges Bass retaliated by ousting her as fire chief on Feb. 21, 2025.

Since the fire, the city has faced criticism for an inadequate deployment of firefighters, a chaotic evacuation of Pacific Palisades and a lack of water caused in part by a local reservoir being left empty for repairs. In December, The Times revealed that the city’s after-action report had been altered to deflect criticism of LAFD’s failure to predeploy engines and crews to the Palisades, among other shortcomings.

Crowley’s lawyers claim Bass’ view of her performance shifted with political opinion — starting with initial praise before the mayor reversed course and criticized Crowley as Bass came under fire for being out of the country during the blaze. The lawsuit was preceded by a legal claim, which is a precursor to a civil suit required by state law, filed against the city in August.

Asked about the lawsuit, Bass senior advisor Yusef Robb said in a statement that “there is nothing new here.”

“Ms. Crowley was removed from her post for her failure to predeploy and her decision to send 1,000 firefighters home instead of keeping them on duty on the morning the fires broke out,” Robb said. “This lawsuit has no merit.”

When Crowley was ousted, the mayor said it was because Crowley failed to inform her about the dangerous conditions that day or to predeploy hundreds of firefighters just in case. She also said Crowley rebuffed a request to prepare a report on the fires — a critical part of ongoing investigations into the cause of the fire and the city’s response.

But Crowley’s lawyers, Genie Harrison and Mia Munro, allege their client “repeatedly warned of the LAFD’s worsening resource and staffing crisis” prior to the fire and warned that aging infrastructure, surging emergency calls and shrinking staff left the city at risk.

“An analysis of the 90th percentile of all incidents indicates that the overall response time of LAFD resources has increased from 6:51 (minutes) in 2018 to 7:53 in 2022. This dramatic increase is nearly double the time by national standards for first-arriving units,” the lawsuit says.

Three days after the fire, Crowley told a local TV news station that her department was “screaming to be properly funded,” which prompted Bass to summon Crowley to her office, according to the lawsuit.

“I don’t know why you had to do that; normally we are on the same page, and I don’t know why you had to say stuff to the media,” Bass told Crowley, according to the lawsuit. Bass allegedly told Crowley she wasn’t firing her then because “right now I can’t do that.”

Before Crowley was ousted, the city’s top financial analyst pushed back on her budget-cutting narrative, saying that spending on the Fire Department actually went up during that budget year — in large part because of a package of firefighter raises. Those increases added an estimated $53 million to the department’s budget.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Newsom’s spokesperson becomes the story

Izzy Gardon, more than any other aide, is suddenly becoming a focal point of the attention — and backlash.

Izzy Gardon isn’t just Gavin Newsom’s chief defender on social media. Increasingly, he is becoming the headline himself.

As Newsom’s spokesperson, Gardon is one of the comms staffers behind the governor’s strategy to counteract Donald Trump’s second presidency by embracing a combative tone and a trolling online presence. But Gardon, more than any other aide, is suddenly becoming a focal point of the attention — and backlash.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Gardon referred to rapper and MAGA activist Nicki Minaj as a “stupid hoe” on X. He reveled in mocking conservative influencer Laura Loomer online after she called him a “FAG,” replying, “I’ve never been more proud!” And this week, Gardon sent an email telling conservative author Susan Crabtree to “Respectfully, fuck off.”

The emergence of Gardon as a prominent character is a result of Newsom’s anti-Trump strategy, a “fight fire with fire” approach designed to undermine the president through imitation, using outlandish memes, hyperbole and AI-generated images. Newsom’s aides have pointed to his rising favorability ratings as evidence of its effectiveness.

“That ethos is how we’re fighting Trump and feeds into the engine of how we’re fighting Trump in these appalling times,” Bob Salladay, Newsom’s senior comms adviser and Gardon’s boss, told Playbook. “Izzy’s creativity and imagination is part of what the governor is doing.”

But Gardon’s bombastic new persona has also provided fodder for Newsom’s critics on the right (and even some Democrats), who’ve questioned his tone and the appropriateness of a government worker making such posts in an official capacity.

“Most unprofessional person to ever work in politics,” Garry Tan, CEO of Y Combinator and Democratic megadonor, posted on X. “Izzy Gardon brings shame to the Newsom campaign.”

Multiple Newsom advisers told Playbook that Gardon’s moxie is no rogue act, but reflects the governor’s exasperation with the political speech normalized by Trump, who’s often used crude language to talk about women, immigrants and other groups.

“If the way to shine a light on Donald Trump’s destructive agenda is to say ‘fuck,’ then fuck yeah,” quipped Jason Elliott, a political adviser to Newsom and his former deputy chief of staff.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

Gov. Newsom Facing Calls to Resign Over Release of ‘Monster’ Convicted Serial Child Abuser

Thousands of California’s convicted pedophiles have been released from prison

Sacramento Sheriff Jim Cooper slammed California Governor Gavin Newsom’s “elderly parole program” Monday, which is allowing David Funston, a serial child rapist to be released from prison. Funston terrorized Sacramento neighborhoods by luring very young children with candy. He kidnapped, brutalized and raped children as young as age 3, then would toss them to the side of the road when he was done.

A judge called him “the monster parents fear the most.”

Thanks to Gov. Gavin Newsom, Funston will be on the streets again.

Now, Gavin Newsom is facing calls to resign his office because his elderly parole program is about to dump another violent convicted child abuser into the community.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

David Funston terrorized Sacramento neighborhoods in 1995. Sheriff Cooper said Funston is 64 years old; Cooper is 62, and in no way “elderly.”

California allows “elderly prisoners” out if they are 50, and have served at least 20 years of their sentence to be considered for parole, and considered no longer a threat. This “law” was a gut-and-amend bill passed in 2020 entirely on party lines without a hearing or notice to the public.

Perhaps ironically, today there are 2,790 registered sex offender pedophiles living very near the State Capitol in downtown Sacramento according to MegansLaw.ca.gov. In 2022, there were 201 registered sex offender pedophiles living very near the State Capitol. Newsom’s sex-offender early release program has let out thousands of convicted pedophiles.

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

Mexico takes out ‘El Mencho’: What the violence could mean for the U.S. border

Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering issues that affect all Californians. Sign up for WhatMatters to receive the latest news and commentary on the most important issues in the Golden State.

The killing of one of Mexico’s most-wanted cartel leaders triggered violent reprisals across the country and experts warn it could lead to prolonged destabilization that pushes more people to flee for the U.S.-Mexico border. 

On Sunday, Mexican security forces, backed by U.S. intelligence, took out the notorious leader of one of the country’s most violent cartels, the Cartel Jalisco Nueva Generación (CJNG). The Mexican federal government said Nemesio Rubén Oseguera Cervantes, also known as “El Mencho,” was wounded during a clash in Tapalpa, Jalisco, and died while being transferred to Mexico City. 

Panic and chaos quickly ensued. Heavily-armed men blocked roads in at least a dozen Mexican states, setting vehicles ablaze and damaging local Oxxo convenience stores. Several flights out of Jalisco were canceled. The United States Embassy in Mexico told U.S. citizens in nine Mexican states to shelter in place, including in Baja California on the border with California. Local officials in Tecate told residents not to leave their homes. 

Mexico’s national statistics agency, INEGI, has repeatedly shown that regions plagued by cartel conflict suffer some of the country’s highest homicide rates. It’s a pattern experts say historically drives internal displacement and northbound migration when violence surges. 

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

A 2022 survey by the United Nations’ International Organization for Migration found a large majority of Mexican migrants cited violence, extortion, or organized crime as reasons for leaving their communities, according to the Council on Foreign Relations. 

In January 2022, the Associated Press reported that cartel violence in western Mexico displaced 35,000 people, highlighting fighting between CJNG and local rivals in Michoacán. In May 2021, news stories described plans for a Tijuana shelter aimed at people displaced by violence from Aguililla, Michoacán, a clear example of how violence-driven flight affects the border region. 

When high-value cartel leaders fall, historically violence spikes in the short term, said Cecilia Farfán-Méndez, an expert on Mexican organized crime and U.S.-Mexico security cooperation, adding that the impacts can often be prolonged and felt even years later.  

“Now with the events from yesterday in Mexico, certainly we have to be cautious about what could ensue and we cannot rule out the possibility that violence could escalate,” she said. 

Farfán-Méndez, the head of the North American Observatory at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime, was in Tijuana on Monday where she described tension as the border city braced for more possible fallout. 

“One thing that is very palpable here, and I think it’s similar to other times, along border cities is the uncertainty of what could happen,” she said.  

Another expert said the situation could lead to people being displaced, but he doesn’t think that it will translate into people actually reaching United States soil because of how secure the border currently is, after policies implemented during President Trump’s first and second terms.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

CA Democrats can’t agree on endorsement for governor. Will Republicans benefit?

The California Democratic Party’s state convention wrapped up Sunday in San Francisco, concluding a three-day event in which 3,500 delegates chose some of their party endorsements for the June 2 primary election. 

As expected, none of the nine Democratic candidates hoping to succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom earned the necessary 60% of votes to win an official party endorsement, though results showed Bay Area U.S. Rep. Eric Swalwell in the lead with 24% of the votes. Former California State Controller Betty Yee and former California Attorney General Xavier Becerra came in second and third, even though they haven’t cracked 5% support in polls. 

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The lack of a party consensus for the next governor underscores a concern among some Democrats that an overcrowded field could mean two Republicans, and no Democrats, advance after the primary and onto the November ballot. That’s because in California, the top two finishers in the primary move on, irrespective of party. 

Outside the gubernatorial election, the party endorsed candidates for the state Legislature and the U.S. House of Representatives. This included aging incumbents over younger upstarts.

But there may be room for some new blood: The party failed to endorse a candidate for California’s 22nd congressional district, where a current state lawmaker is up against a progressive political newcomer. 

Read more about the governor’s race and House elections from CalMatters’ Jeanne Kuang and Maya C. Miller, respectively.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

A Republican governor in heavily Democratic California? We should end the top-two primary

Less than four months ago, California voters overwhelmingly approved redrawing House districts to counter President Donald Trump’s maneuver to subvert democracy in Texas. When casting ballots in this fall’s gubernatorial election, however, our state’s electorate could be confronted with a ballot that turns democracy on its head. They could be forced to choose between two Republican candidates for governor.

The scenario is a result of California’s screwball top-two primary. Under this system, the two leading vote-getters in the primary — regardless of their party, regardless of how small their share of the vote — advance to the general election. 

Unlike other states, California election law does not even allow for an escape valve, such as the one available to Alaskans in 2010, when they reelected U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski with write-in votes after she had lost the Republican primary to a Tea Party challenger.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Under California’s system, write-in votes are not allowed. Voters get just two choices. Take ’em or leave ’em.

How could a majority of California voters be disenfranchised this fall? There are eight substantial declared Democratic candidates as of last week. None has emerged as a favorite. All have political bona fides. All have a small base from which to start. Collectively, they have the potential to divide the Democratic electorate pie into small slices.

There are two declared Republican candidates, and early polls show them to be about even. Together, they could divide the Republican electorate by about half.

Democratic voters outnumber Republicans in California by about 2 to 1. So here’s the math: 40% of Republicans is greater than 20% of Democrats. That’s how the June primary could produce two Republican winners for the general election.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

Gov. Newsom’s launches book tour in key presidential primary states | California Politics 360

Gov. Gavin Newsom this weekend kicked off his nationwide book tour, making stops in some key states in which he’ll need support if he decides to run for president.

The tour started in Nashville on Saturday, followed by stops in Atlanta on Sunday and then South Carolina on Monday. The tour continues to New York later in the week before stops in San Francisco and Los Angeles. at the end of February and early March.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The governor is also reportedly heading to New Hampshire in March.

The governor is promoting his memoir, “Young Man in a Hurry,” which will be on sale starting Feb. 24.

“You don’t to sell books when you go to New Hampshire, you go to campaign for president,” said Democratic strategist Steven Maviglio. “It’s no secret, that’s what he’s doing.”

“He’s more so young man in a hurry to be president, which is really what he is right now,” said Republican strategist Tim Rosales, who said national Republicans can use this as a target.

“Gavin Newsom fits that bill,” he said.

Click here to read the full article at KCRA

Armed man shot and killed after entering Mar-a-Lago secure perimeter, Secret Service says

An armed man was shot and killed Sunday morning after he entered the secure perimeter of President Trump’s private Florida residence and resort, Mar-a-Lago, and was confronted by U.S. Secret Service agents and a Palm Beach County sheriff’s deputy.

The man killed was identified by investigators as Austin Tucker Martin, 21, from North Carolina, according to a law enforcement source familiar with the investigation. Martin had been reported missing by his family a few days prior.

Trump, who on Saturday night hosted the annual Governors Dinner at the White House, was not at Mar-a-Lago at the time of the incident.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

According to the Secret Service, law enforcement officers spotted a man in his early 20s with a shotgun and a fuel can by the north gate of Trump’s residence in Palm Beach, Fla., around 1:30 a.m.

When a deputy from the Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office and two Secret Service agents went to investigate, they ordered him to drop the items, Palm Beach County Sheriff Ric L. Bradshaw said during a news conference Sunday morning.

“He put down the gas can, raised the shotgun to a shooting position,” Bradshaw said. “At that point in time, the deputy and the two Secret Service agents fired their weapons and neutralized the threat.”

The man was declared dead at the scene. Rafael Barros, special agent in charge of the Secret Service’s Miami field office, said no law enforcement agents were harmed in the incident.

The FBI is leading the investigation.

Brett Skiles, special agent in charge of the FBI’s Miami field office, said the Evidence Response Team is processing the scene and collecting evidence. He asked residents in the vicinity to check their exterior cameras and contact the FBI or the West Palm Beach Sheriff’s Office if they spotted anything that looks suspicious or out of place.

The officers involved were wearing body cameras, Bradshaw said.

Asked whether the man was known to law enforcement before the incident, Bradshaw said, “Not right now.”

The Secret Service said in a statement that it is working with the FBI and Palm Beach County Sheriff’s Office to learn more about the deceased man’s background, actions and motive. The agents involved in the incident, it said, will be placed on routine administrative leave during the investigation “in accordance with agency policy.”

The incident comes amid a wave of violence against political figures across the ideological spectrum.

Click here to read the full article at the LA Times

Here’s who is running in the heated race for insurance commissioner

In a typical election year, the interest in the down-ballot race for California insurance commissioner musters modest interest at best.

That all changed on Jan. 7, 2025, when wildfires swept through L.A. County, damaging or destroying more than 18,000 homes and killing at least 31 people.

The resulting anger directed at the insurance industry over how it has handled claims has helped draw four Democrats into the race, who will be vying this weekend for a critical endorsement at the party’s annual convention in San Francisco ahead of the June 2 primary election.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“We haven’t seen this level of competition and, frankly, choice on the Democratic side since it first became an elected office in 1990,” said Jamie Court, president of Consumer Watchdog, a Los Angeles insurance advocacy group. “They represent wide-ranging views and a broad diversity of candidates.”

Up for endorsement are state Sen. Benjamin Allen (D-Santa Monica), whose district includes the Palisades fire zone; former San Francisco Supervisor Jane Kim; former state Sen. Steven Bradford; and San Francisco businessman Patrick Wolff, who has not held elective office.

Three Republicans have declared their candidacies, but that party’s convention isn’t until April. The filing deadline to file for the race is March 6.

The GOP field includes businessman Robert Howell, who lost by 20 points in the 2022 general election to current Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara. Also running are insurance agent Stacy Korsgaden from Grover Beach, and attorney Merritt Farren, whose Pacific Palisades home burned down.

Peace and Freedom Party candidate Eduardo Vargas, a Los Angeles school teacher, is on the ballot too.

The race also follows Lara’s two troubled terms in office, during which he has been accused of cozying up to and receiving money from the insurance industry for his first campaign and conferences abroad.

Click here to read the full article at the LA Times

Walters: Silicon Valley flexes financial muscle in governor’s race and wealth tax battle

Over the last half-century, digital technology has reshaped the daily lives of people everywhere and created vast new industries. But no spot on the globe has been more affected than its birthplace.

The transformation of the Santa Clara Valley from a bucolic grower of fruit into the technological powerhouse of Silicon Valley — thanks largely to Stanford University’s presence — fueled a dramatic evolution of California’s economy, growing it into the fourth largest in the world, were it a nation.

Technology isn’t just a linchpin of the economy; the immense personal wealth of its creators has — perhaps unfortunately — become a crucial source of revenue for the state. The top 1% of California’s taxpayers generate nearly half its personal income taxes or, put another way, nearly a third of the state’s general fund revenues.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Despite its importance to California’s economy and budget, Silicon Valley has not — compared to other major economic sectors — paid much attention to state government.

While farmers, bankers, medical providers, casino-owning tribes and other segments of the economy have hired lobbyists and doled out campaign money, tech tycoons have assumed their products and services were so obviously valuable to the state, they needn’t worry about what was happening in Sacramento.

That attitude is changing fast.

Click here to read the full article via CalMatters at EastBayTimes