Trump DOJ Moves to End LAUSD’s Outdated Race-Based PHBAO Program

The program labels roughly 90 percent of LAUSD schools as PHBAO, then punishes schools with higher percentages of White students by giving them larger class sizes, fewer resources, and lower priority for magnet programs

The Trump Justice Department has moved decisively to dismantle one of California’s most blatant examples of institutionalized racial discrimination in the second-largest school district in the country: the Los Angeles Unified School District’s PHBAO program.

In a motion to intervene in federal court (see below), the DOJ is backing the 1776 Project Foundation’s lawsuit against LAUSD’s six-decade-old PHBAO (Predominantly Hispanic, Black, Asian, and Other Non-Anglo) scheme. The program labels roughly 90 percent of LAUSD schools as “PHBAO” based solely on racial demographics — then punishes schools with higher percentages of White students by giving them larger class sizes, fewer resources, and lower priority for magnet programs.

Simply put, if your child attends a school with “too many” White students, they get punished. This is not desegregation. It is government-sanctioned reverse discrimination.

Attorney General Pam Bondi made the administration’s position crystal clear: “Treating Americans equally is not a suggestion — it is a core constitutional guarantee that educational institutions must follow. This Department of Justice will never stop fighting to make that guarantee a reality, including for public-school students in Los Angeles.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

First Assistant U.S. Attorney Bill Essayli, the Trump-appointed prosecutor leading the charge in the Central District of California, stated the program is unconstitutional. “Now in its sixth decade, LAUSD’s desegregation program has outlived its usefulness to the point of being unconstitutional. School districts must treat their students equally and no longer discriminate on the basis of race,” Essayli stated.

The PHBAO program traces its roots to 1970s court orders following a 1970 Los Angeles Superior Court ruling that found LAUSD operated segregated schools. Class-size reduction tied to racial formulas began in 1978, with the specific PHBAO designation and magnet-point preferences formalized in the late 1970s and early 1980s. What began as a response to historical segregation has morphed into a permanent racial-caste system that now penalizes the district’s tiny White student population.

Today, White (non-Hispanic) students make up just 10% of LAUSD’s enrollment in a district that is approximately 73% Hispanic, 7% Black, and 4-5% Asian. Yet under PHBAO rules, schools with “too many” White students are treated as disadvantaged — receiving fewer teachers per student and reduced access to coveted programs.

This is the same Marxist ideology that has wrecked California’s public schools: prioritizing race over merit, equity over excellence, and social justice over color-blind justice. While LAUSD bleeds students and money — with attendance plummeting and families fleeing failing schools — bureaucrats continue playing racial bean-counting games with taxpayer dollars.

LAUSD parents have watched their children suffer in failing schools for years while bureaucrats played racial favorites. White families in “Anglo” schools got fewer teachers, larger classes, and slammed doors on opportunity — all because their skin color didn’t check the right demographic box.

The Trump DOJ’s intervention is a long-overdue rejection of this Marxist madness. It reaffirms that the Constitution demands color-blind justice — not racial punishment for White children whose only crime is their skin color in a majority-minority district.

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

California expanding services for immigrants amid Trump’s deportation push

Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering issues that affect all Californians. Sign up for WhatMatters to receive the latest news and commentary on the most important issues in the Golden State.

Gov. Gavin Newsom plans on Friday to announce the allocation of state funding to help immigrants impacted by detention and the Trump administration’s massive deportation agenda. 

His office is releasing $35 million that the Legislature set aside in the state budget to help philanthropic partners connect immigrant families with food assistance and other basic needs. 

The money comes in addition to funds California set aside to provide legal resources to immigrants facing deportation.

“When federal actions create fear and instability, our responsibility is to show up for families. This investment strengthens local partners who are helping people access legal services and meet basic needs during an incredibly difficult moment,” said Kim Johnson, secretary of the California Health and Human Services Agency.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

California found money for the support despite serious budget constraints. Newsom’s office expects a $2.9 billion deficit in the coming budget year, and the state limited health care for unauthorized immigrants this year to help resolve a larger deficit in 2025. 

A spokesperson for Newsom said the governor has been hearing directly from immigrant families and community leaders. “People are afraid to leave their homes, afraid to go to school or work, and unable to afford groceries,” the spokesperson said. CalMatters has reported on families in farmworker communities who are foregoing critical medical care. 

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

Furious with Trump, California Democrats plot election strategy in San Francisco

With so many candidates running for governor, it’s hard to keep up. We’re here to help: Sign up for our 2026 election newsletter to get the latest on the candidates.

California Democrats this weekend in San Francisco have an opportunity to set the tone in a pivotal election year when their voters could decide control of the U.S. House. 

As Democrats across the country push to harness dissatisfaction with the Trump administration into a transformative November midterm, all eyes are on the nation’s largest state party as it chooses who to support in California’s June primary.

Party leaders are riding high after voters backed Proposition 50, the ballot measure to gerrymander congressional districts in favor of Democrats. The three-day gathering gives it an early opportunity to build on that momentum for the upcoming elections.

The state’s marquee race this year is the one to succeed outgoing Gov. Gavin Newsom, a national Democratic star with presidential aspirations who terms out at the end of this year. But don’t expect a rousing party endorsement there: With nearly 10 candidates, it’s unlikely any of them will attract enough of the 3,500 expected Democratic delegates to secure the nod. Newsom himself won’t attend, a spokesperson said.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Instead, one of the biggest questions will be whether California Democrats continue to anoint establishment candidates — those with backing from elected party leaders, high-dollar donors and powerful lobbying groups — or if political newcomers can convert their grassroots support from the party into actual endorsements.

For years, young Democrats in particular have urged the party to embrace bolder, more progressive ideas such as universal health coverage, tuition-free college, banning the sale of arms to Israel and eschewing the Democratic Party’s longstanding deference to seniority and incumbency through term limits. The brashness of the second Trump administration has given new urgency to those demands as the Democratic base tires of what activists call a milquetoast “radical civility” approach. 

“The fact that we’re in a national emergency means there’s no time for incrementalism or moderation,” said Heidi Hall, a Nevada County supervisor and the first Democrat to announce she is challenging incumbent GOP Rep. Kevin Kiley to represent a competitive district east of Sacramento. 

“Any Democrat in office who’s not willing to fight this hard should get out, should step aside and let someone else in who is going to fight it,” Hall said. “Or they’re going to be complicit in what’s happening.”

Click here to read the full article at CalMatters

Bernie Sanders and Gavin Newsom become adversaries over push to tax California billionaires

LOS ANGELES (AP) — As national Democrats search for a unifying theme ahead of the fall’s midterm elections, a California proposal to levy a hefty tax on billionaires is turning some of the party’s leading figures into adversaries just when Democrats can least afford division from within.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders traveled to Los Angeles on Wednesday to campaign for the tax proposal, which has Silicon Valley in an uproar, with tech titans threatening to leave the state. Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom is among its outspoken opponents, warning that it could leave government finances in crisis and put the state at a competitive disadvantage nationally.

At an evening rally near downtown, Sanders told cheering supporters that the nation has reached a crisis point in which “massive income and wealth inequality” has concentrated power over business, technology, government and the media within the “billionaire class,” while millions of working-class Americans struggle to pay household bills.

He said enactment of the proposed tax would show “we are still living in a democratic society where the people have some power.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“Enough is enough,” Sanders said to a pulse of applause. “The billionaire class cannot have it all. This nation belongs to all of us.”

The senator, a democratic socialist, is popular in California — he won the 2020 Democratic presidential primary in the state in a runaway. He’s been railing for decades against what he characterizes as wealthy elites and the growing gap between rich and poor.

Click here to read the full article at WWWLP.com

Republican Steve Hilton surges ahead in California governor’s race

A new frontrunner has emerged in California’s wide-open race for governor.

Conservative commentator Steve Hilton now leads the field with 17%, followed by Democrat Rep. Eric Swalwell and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco, a Republican, who are tied at 14%, according to an Emerson College Polling/Inside California Politics survey of 1,000 likely voters released Wednesday.

Hilton is a former director of strategy for British Prime Minister David Cameron and a current Fox News contributor. He took in roughly $4.1 million in donations in the second half of 2025, according to campaign finance reports cited by CalMatters.

Bianco had a one point lead over Hilton and Swalwell in early December.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Former Rep. Katie Porter has 10% support in the latest poll and billionaire Tom Steyer has 9% – both are Democrats. Importantly, 21% of respondents said they remain undecided.

Pollsters noted that since December, support for Hilton and Steyer rose five points, support for Swalwell increased two points and support for Porter dipped by one point.

The Republican electorate in California is split between Steve Hilton at 38% and Chad Bianco at 37%, while Hilton also picks up a plurality of independent voters at 22%,” said Spencer Kimball, executive director of Emerson College Polling. “Democratic voters have not yet clearly coalesced around one candidate.”

Outside the top tier, San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan has struggled to gain traction since entering the race in late January.

“Maybe its because he got in late, but the enthusiasm for his candidacy is not right now translating into votes,” noted political analyst Matt Klink.

California’s primary is set for June 2. The two candidates with the most votes, regardless of party, will advance to the November general election to determine who will succeed Gov. Gavin Newsom, who is term-limited.

Click here to read the full article at KTLA News

Feds launch probe into California’s ‘blind eye’ on unemployment fraud

California officials who turned a blind eye to unemployment scams — potentially worth tens of billions of dollars during the pandemic — will now be put directly under the microscope of the federal government.

The US Department of Labor is set to send a letter to the state’s Employment Development Department announcing a “strike team” will soon be touching down in the Golden State to root out theft and abuse, The California Post has learned. The investigation will be similar to efforts currently underway in Minnesota.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“Financial issues and potential fraud in California’s unemployment insurance program will be fully examined,” Labor Secretary Lori Chavez-DeRemer told The Post in a statement, while also taking a shot at former President Joe Biden.

“The previous administration turned a blind eye toward failing Labor programs: This ends now.” 

Federal investigators have been combing through financial records tied to Minnesota fraud schemes after prosecutors uncovered what they describe as a sprawling web of pandemic-era theft, including the massive “Feeding Our Future” case that allegedly siphoned roughly $250 million in federal child-nutrition funds through fake claims and shell companies. 

In total, a staggering $9 billion may have been stolen in Minnesota, according to federal prosecutors. Nearly 100 people had been charged with crimes as of last month.

The breadth of fraud in California, however, could leave Minnesota’s thievery looking like chump change.

The feds provided California nearly $290 billion in relief funds during the pandemic, and EDD was among the largest recipients as it was tasked with rapidly implementing expanded unemployment benefits.

Click here to read the full article in the California Post

California’s ‘crazy’ ballot measure economy and Newsom’s world tou

SIGNATURE ISSUE — California’s overheated ballot measure economy was spared one temperature spike — but it’s still about to boil over.

Proponents of more than a dozen statewide measures have been gathering signatures to get on the November ballot, with each new entrant threatening to drive up what signature gathering firms can charge. For some measures, prices had already climbed as deep-pocketed players like Uber, which recently dropped another $20 million into its ballot committee, pushed to qualify.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“It’s already crazy,” said longtime petition pro Fred Kimball. “This is the strangest year I’ve ever seen.”

And that was before the anti-wealth-tax windfall.

An expected acceleration … Consultants have been anxiously waiting for campaigns with enormous war chests to hit the street, causing prices to spike — and lately, they’ve been obsessing over a mysterious cluster of measures designed to undercut a billionaire’s tax. Because latecomers have a scant two months to qualify, a sprint to the finish inflates costs even further.

“With so many that are late, the price is bid up,” said former Sen. Bob Hertzberg, who said his housing bond has enough signatures that it can come off the street soon. “There’s a real fear that a lot of the people aren’t going to qualify.”

Everyone is watching for the fallout. Signature inflation has become one of the hottest topics in California politics, with people trading data about who’s paying what and speculating about which rival campaigns will lose out.

“You have really well-resourced groups that are willing to pretty much light a match to money,” said a person working on an initiative already in circulation, who was not authorized to speak publicly on its proponent’s behalf. “‘If you think it’s expensive now, just wait,’ is the framing I keep getting.”

We’re starting to find out. Two of the five anti-wealth-tax measures hit the street at $12 a signature as of Friday, according to campaign professionals tracking the market. The going rate rose to $10 for a union-backed measure extending a high income tax on top earners and a lawyer-championed measure counteracting Uber’s initiative governing legal representation.

A reprieve: Sighs of relief echoed through Sacramento last week as OpenAI announced it would pull its measure to regulate artificial intelligence, which had just received title and summary, as it hunts for a legislative deal. The initiative could still return in 2028.

So for now, OpenAI’s cash won’t be a factor. But the wealth tax’s opponents are both determined and rich, and campaigns are closely monitoring to see if they flood the market with enough money to undermine SEIU-UHW’s proposed wealth tax.

Kimball, who has the levy as a client, said he believes it is still on track to qualify, although the cost per signature had already jumped from $5 to $8 in a couple of weeks before the counter-measures started circulating.

The people behind the five anti-wealth-tax measures have been resolutely tight-lipped about their supporters and their strategy (per usual their designated proponent did not comment for this story). But it’s not hard to envision a world in which they put their best-polling measure on the street at the highest price they can manage.

Whether that’s intended to qualify their own measures as quickly as possible or freeze out their rivals, the hit to rival campaigns’ bank accounts would be the same.

“It’s the battle,” said Kimball, “between the billionaires and the people trying to pass legislation to fight the billionaires.”

Click here to read the full article in Politico

Jesse Jackson, one of the nation’s most powerful voices for Black Americans, dies at 84

The Rev. Jesse Jackson, a child of Southern segregation who rose to national prominence as a powerful voice for Black economic and racial equality, has died.

Jackson, who had battled the neurodegenerative condition progressive supranuclear palsy for more than a decade, died at home surrounded by family. His daughter, Santita Jackson, confirmed his death with the Associated Press. He was 84. Jackson was originally diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease in 2017 before the PSP diagnosis was confirmed in April.

“Our father was a servant leader — not only to our family, but to the oppressed, the voiceless, and the overlooked around the world,” the Jackson family said in a statement posted online. “We shared him with the world, and in return, the world became part of our extended family. His unwavering belief in justice, equality, and love uplifted millions, and we ask you to honor his memory by continuing the fight for the values he lived by.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Handsome and dynamic, an orator with a flair for memorable rhyme, Jackson was the first Black candidate for president to attract a major following, declaring in 1984 that “our time has come” and drawing about 3.5 million votes in Democratic primaries — roughly 1 in 5 of those cast.

Four years later, using the slogan “Keep hope alive,” he ran again, winning 7 million votes, second only to the eventual nominee, Massachusetts Gov. Michael S. Dukakis. His hourlong speech at the 1988 Democratic National Convention brought many delegates to tears and provided the gathering’s emotional high point.

“Every one of these funny labels they put on you, those of you who are watching this broadcast tonight in the projects, on the corners — I understand,” he said. “Call you outcast, low down, you can’t make it, you’re nothing, you’re from nobody, subclass, underclass; when you see Jesse Jackson, when my name goes in nomination, your name goes in nomination.”

For nearly a generation, from the 1970s into the 1990s, that ability to absorb the insults and rejection suffered by Black Americans and transmute them into a defiant rhetoric of success made Jackson the most prominent Black figure in the country. Both beneficiary and victim of white America’s longstanding insistence on having one media-anointed leader serve as the spokesman for tens of millions of Black citizens, he drew adulation and jeers but consistently held the spotlight.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

The California Affordability Problem That Newsom’s Fans Don’t Want to Talk About

On the menu today: I’ve written a bunch of profile pieces of presidential candidates over the years. I always thought the best part of them was when they told you something you didn’t already know about the candidate; by the time a politician is running, we often already know the basics. Back in the 2020 cycle, I wrote “Things You Probably Didn’t Know” columns about Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Bernie Sanders, Pete Buttigieg, Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Cory Booker, Kirsten Gillibrand, Tulsi Gabbard, Sherrod Brown, and Michael Bloomberg.

We’re still in early 2026, but two major national magazines have published profiles about Gavin Newsom that seemed more interested in his appearance, his body language, and his sartorial choices than in what he’s actually done as governor of California for the past seven years. And neither one had much to say about California becoming, far and away, the most unaffordable state in the country on Newsom’s watch. Read on.

The Glowing Profiles That Miss the Real Story

Another week brings another gushing profile of California Governor Gavin Newsom, this time in The New Yorker, which is supposed to be a much more serious and intellectually rigorous magazine than Vogue, the last glossy magazine to swoon over Newsom.

Nathan Heller wrote a long profile, more than 12,000 words, so it’s hard to succinctly summarize, but this paragraph struck me as the core contention of the article:

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Since the pandemic, it has been fashionable for Republicans to stand on San Francisco street corners and point to homeless people, spinning out a story of apocalyptic decay that, they say, results from Democratic leadership. Newsom argues the inverse. Since his first year as governor, he has promoted an idea of California as a terrarium for Democratic principle — enshrining reproductive rights in the state constitution, upholding sanctuary-state policies, pushing for police reform — while emphasizing its successes over its failures. California, the closest thing to a test zone for the blue economy, is home to roughly half of all American unicorn startups, which are valued at more than a billion dollars each, and technologists who made a show of fleeing because of taxes and regulations, like Elon Musk, have returned to found A.I. firms. “The Republicans’ governing thesis cannot be true if California succeeds,” Jason Elliott, a former deputy chief of staff in Newsom’s office, told me. “We disprove their ideas that pluralism is a recipe for failure, that completely deregulated capital is the only way to grow.” He added, “It drives them f***ing crazy.”

First, if you think Republicans oppose “pluralism,” you have not spent much time in places like Florida, or Texas, or Nevada, or Arizona. For what it’s worth, the whitest states in the country are GOP-leaning West Virginia, followed by Democratic-leaning Vermont and Maine and purplish New Hampshire. Also, everyone living under the current tariff regime and the expanding federal government ownership role in private businesses would be surprised to learn that Republicans promote “completely deregulated capital.”

Click here to read the full article in the National Review

Kevin McCarthy calls Gavin Newsom’s leadership a ‘failure,’ warns California is on ‘downward slope’

EXCLUSIVE—Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy pointed to outmigration from California as evidence of what he described as Gov. Gavin Newsom’s failed leadership of the Golden State in an interview with Fox News Digital on Friday.

“What a failure,” McCarthy said. “You look at how many people left the state, you look how people look at the state, you look at the homelessness, you lool [sic] the major corporations that are generating income here have left. We’re on a downward slope.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

California has led the nation in outbound migration for six years, according to U-Haul. Several corporations, including Chevron, Tesla and Charles Schwab, also moved their California headquarters to other states.

Newsom Touts California’s Numerous Legal Fights With Trump Administration In Final State Of The State

newsom-mccarthy
Former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy labeled California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s leadership of the state as a “failure.” (Getty Images)

When asked whether he believes a Republican could be elected governor in the deep-blue state, McCarthy said it is not off the table due to California’s unique jungle primary system where the top two candidates compete against each other regardless of political party.

“If Republicans were smart, and they powered on the idea, we could actually come out of the primary with only two Republicans,” he explained. “It’s not any sure thing, but it’s a unique strategy that can work. It’s not fighting with one another; it’s generating more people to come because it’s an open primary.”

Read On The Fox News App

McCarthy went on to assess the 11 candidates vying to replace Newsom, who is term-limited, seven of whom recently participated in a debate in San Francisco on Feb. 3.

The former speaker argued Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., is not capable of being the next governor, while naming Democratic candidate and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan as one who could “rise up.”

“You look at the Democrats — so many running and so many who are not qualified,” McCarthy said. “Like, Eric Swalwell is not qualified to be governor. He’s not qualified to actually run for governor.”

Showdown For The House: Democrats, Republicans Brace For High-stakes Midterm Clash

Rep. Eric Swalwell and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan
Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., (left) and San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan (right) are running to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom.

Click here to read the full article on AOL.com via FoxNews