Can a court force a government agency to provide work, if the agency does not have the information to provide correct maps, hold hearings with the data—since the Census Bureau is months late in providing the data.
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!““The Commission is disappointed that the California Supreme Court did not agree with our justification for a January 14, 2022 deadline to submit final maps to the California Secretary of State,” stated Commission Chair Neal Fornaciari. “While disappointed with the ruling, the Commission is committed to ensuring continued public participation in the process and to posting the first set of draft district maps by the court mandated date of November 15, 2021 and to delivering the final district maps to the Secretary of State by the court mandated date of December 27, 2021. The Commission would like to thank the Court for its timely consideration and response to our petition.”
If they “meet the court mandated deadline, the work will be shoddy. But, what if they don’t meet the deadline—what can the court do to them? NOTHING. I am in the hope that provide accurate maps and data—even if it takes till mid January—or let the court provide the maps instead—of course that would add months to the process.
California Redistricting Commission, 9/23/21
SACRAMENTO, CA—Today, the California Supreme Court ruled on the 2020 California Citizens Redistricting Commission’s (Commission) petition to clarify and/or modify the writ of mandate issued by the Court on July 17, 2020 (Legislature of CA v Alex Padilla S262530)—when it ruled that the Commission should have until December 15, 2021 to submit its maps to the California Secretary of State due to the delay in release of census results. If census results were received after July 31, 2021, the Commission’s deadline would be adjusted accordingly to compensate for the additional federal delay.
“The Commission is disappointed that the California Supreme Court did not agree with our justification for a January 14, 2022 deadline to submit final maps to the California Secretary of State,” stated Commission Chair Neal Fornaciari. “While disappointed with the ruling, the Commission is committed to ensuring continued public participation in the process and to posting the first set of draft district maps by the court mandated date of November 15, 2021 and to delivering the final district maps to the Secretary of State by the court mandated date of December 27, 2021. The Commission would like to thank the Court for its timely consideration and response to our petition.”
The State of California received local level data from the U.S. Census Bureau on August 12, 2021. These data required further preparation by the Statewide Database to allow for the state’s incarcerated population to be counted with the communities of their last known residence and reformat the data for use by the Commission. The Statewide Database published official census results on September 20, 2021. These data are available at: https://statewidedatabase.org/redistricting2021/pl94-legacy.html.
The relief sought by the Commission’s motion aimed to preserve the maximum opportunity for the public to be involved throughout the redistricting process by instituting a January 14, 2022 deadline, and for the Commission to be able to receive and respond to the public’s input, while adhering as closely as possible to the framework envisioned and adopted by the Voters First Act.
Every 10 years, after the federal government publishes updated census information, California must redraw the boundaries of its electoral districts so that the state’s population is evenly allocated among the new districts.
In 2008, California voters passed the Voters First Act, authorizing the creation of the independent California Citizens Redistricting Commission to draw new State Senate, State Assembly, and State Board of Equalization district lines. In 2010, the Voters First Act for Congress gave the Commission the responsibility of drawing new Congressional districts following every census.
For more information, please visit WeDrawTheLinesCA.org.
About Stephen Frank
Being cynical does anyone believe that the delay has anything to do with continuing districts that support the Radical Democrat Agenda?
I do.
The last go-around in Santa Barbara County, and Ventura County were jokes. The dilution of conservative and middle class voting was clear. The inclusion of Leftest colleges and union strong holds were intentionally in these districts when the population grown should have driven them into already Radical districts and away from the Right.
The delays are poking the bear and the bear as was shown in the recall is the voters who are starting to get their fill of the Communist Ideology.
There is a reason why private schools and conservative colleges are growing significantly.
The courts are tools and the delays are intentional. Kind of like the Democrats refusing to clean 400,000 voters from the rolls.
And you vote Democrat why? Are you that corrupt?