Control of California National Guard returns to Gov. Newsom after federalization in June

The control of the California National Guard returns to the governor Wednesday following an order from the Ninth Circuit.

The clash over the control of the California National Guard began in June, when President Donald Trump first deployed thousands of members of the National Guard to Los Angeles after two days of clashes over immigration raids. Gov. Gavin Newsom called the move “purposefully inflammatory,” and California took legal action just days later, sparking the legal battle.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Following months of dispute in court, a judge ruled earlier this month that the Trump administration must return control of the California National Guard to the state. However, a stay requested by the DOJ allowed the administration to retain control of the troops. Part of that request was not granted, and the troops were pulled from Los Angeles.

On Tuesday, the DOJ submitted a supplemental brief stating it does “not oppose lifting of the partial administrative stay and hereby respectfully withdraw their motion for a stay pending appeal.” Read the full brief here.

The Ninth Circuit officially vacated the stay in the case on Wednesday, meaning the control of the troops returns to Gov. Newsom.

The action comes on the same day President Trump took to social media to announce he was removing the Guard troops from Los Angeles, Chicago, and Portland, Oregon.

“We will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again – Only a question of time!” he wrote.

Click here to read the full article at KCRA

A General Is Fired From the Scandal-Plagued California National Guard

In yet another ouster of a top commander for the troubled California National Guard, a brigadier general has been fired after internal inquiries found that he inappropriately used military personnel for personal tasks, had a subordinate complete part of his cybersecurity training and otherwise engaged in conduct that seeded distrust in the ranks.

Brig. Gen. Jeffrey Magram will be “involuntarily transferred” next week to the U.S. Air Force retired reserve, an action that is “parallel” to a firing, California National Guard spokesman Lt. Col. Brandon Hill said Friday.

Magram, who was once director of the Guard’s air staff, is the fifth general to resign, retire or be fired in the wake of scandals exposed by Times investigations of the organization over the last four years.

Most of the allegations against Magram were first disclosed in a Times report in June. Weeks later, the longtime head of the Guard, Maj. Gen. David Baldwin, retired.

In an email to The Times, Hill said an internal disciplinary board substantiated the allegations against Magram, and the general was removed “for cause.” The board’s action came after two separate inquiries into Magram’s conduct by military inspectors general; directives to dismiss him were issued by Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office and Baldwin’s successor, Maj. Gen. Matthew Beevers, the Guard’s acting adjutant general.

Attempts to reach Magram for comment were unsuccessful. Beevers and Newsom did not respond to requests for comment made through spokespersons.

In a memorandum to Magram that The Times obtained this week, Beevers wrote, “Your conduct has caused me to lose faith, trust, and confidence in your ability to continue serving.”

The 20,000-member Guard, a branch of the California Military Department, which is also led by the adjutant general, serves a dual mission that includes responding to emergencies in the state, such as earthquakes, wildfires and civil disturbances, and assisting U.S. armed forces in military operations overseas.

Magram attained the rank of assistant adjutant general and had been part of Baldwin’s inner circle. However, in 2021, Baldwin suspended him with pay and reassigned him after a Times report that Guard members were concerned that their leaders had readied an F-15C fighter jet for a possible mission in which the aircraft would fly low over civilian protesters to frighten and disperse them.

Baldwin denied that the jet had been prepared for such a deployment and said the move against Magram had nothing to do with the report. He said the same about his decision to fire Maj. Gen. Gregory Jones, commander of the air wing of the Guard.

Magram became the focus of more upheaval last summer, when The Times disclosed that an internal probe found that he had on-duty Guard members drive him up to 120 miles round-trip to personal dental and medical appointments at Travis Air Force Base, according to a confidential report on the inquiry. The document quoted one unnamed Guard member as saying he did not want to drive Magram because “my job is to take care of the airmen in the state of California and not be a chauffeur for a general.”

A Guard member who took Magram’s mother shopping was quoted in the report as saying that “she was particular. When I say particular, it had to be at Whole Foods. … It just took her a long time to decide what she wanted, a lot of comparison shopping amongst products.”

Magram had generally confirmed the members’ accounts of running errands for him, according to the report. He said he believed that having subordinates give him rides to medical appointments was consistent with the Air Force’s “wingman concept,” in which Guard members look out for one another.

“I want to reiterate that had I ever heard of any ethics issues like this from subordinates, peers or commanders, or perceptions of such, I would have corrected or addressed it on the spot,” Magram said in a statement to an inspector general.

However, Magram had been counseled in 2017 that tasking Guard members for rides to personal appointments was inappropriate, the report stated, adding that his “wingman” argument “rings hollow.” The investigation similarly faulted him for using an underling to work on his travel awards accounts, including for personal trips.

The inquiry also determined that Magram failed to complete his annual cybersecurity training and thus had lower-ranking Guard members each day request that headquarters temporarily restore his computer access. This went on for about two weeks, until he had the training completed by a subordinate. Magram said in his statement that he was late in completing the training because of “a tremendously busy operational tempo.”

The Air Force initially issued a letter of admonishment to Magram as a result of the first inspector general investigation. After queries by The Times, however, the Guard said a second inquiry had substantiated similar allegations against him, and another round of discipline was pending. That culminated in his firing.

The Guard memo obtained by The Times says Magram on several occasions “wrongfully encouraged or requested subordinates” to perform tasks or run errands for him outside their military duties, such as giving him rides to personal appointments. The document also cites the cybersecurity episode as grounds for dismissing him, stating that he “let a subordinate click through the training questions and obtain a certificate of completion for you.”

The memo further recounts that a 2021 survey of Guard members found that they “experienced significant issues with unit cohesion, good order, and military discipline because of [Magram’s] conduct.”

In early 2019, a Times report disclosed internal complaints of reprisals against whistleblowers and allegations of a cover-up of misconduct among the Guard leadership. The complaints focused on the organization’s Fresno air base and included an incident in which someone urinated in a female Guard member’s boots. Baldwin later removed the commander of the Guard’s air side, Maj. Gen. Clay Garrison. The commander of the 144th Fighter Wing at the Fresno base was also removed.

In 2020, in response to another Times report, Newsom’s office denounced the Guard’s decision to send a military spy plane to suburban El Dorado Hills, where Baldwin lived, to help civilian authorities monitor demonstrations over the police killing of George Floyd. Baldwin said the fact that he resided in El Dorado Hills, where the protests were small and peaceful, had no bearing on the deployment of the RC-26B reconnaissance plane.

The Times reported last year that an internal inquiry substantiated allegations that Brig. Gen. David Hawkins made antisemitic and homophobic slurs, including that Jews are unrepentant sinners and that gay marriage is a reason terrorists attack the United States. Hawkins received a letter of reprimand as a result, the Guard said. Responding to a subsequent Times query, the Guard confirmed in June that Hawkins had resigned.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

CA National Guard Demands Return of 10,000 Enlistment Bonuses

Iraqi FreedomAbout 10,000 California Army National Guard members have been ordered to return enlistment bonuses of $15,000 or more they accepted from military recruiters that committed fraud at the height of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars.

Because the U.S. military had the Selective Service draft during the unpopular Vietnam War, the Army could pay below poverty level wages and still feed infantry units with huge numbers of teenage boys. The effort to enforce the Selective Service Registration law was abandoned in 1986 in favor of an all-volunteer Armed Forces.

The U.S. military has sustained the longest continuous era of ground combat in American history by offering more competitive pay and benefits. But with the growing technical sophistication of modern missions, the military has also been offering enlistment and re-enlistment bonuses to fill key military occupation specialties (MOS).

To support deployments at the height of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars, a temporary Recruiting Assistance Program was instituted in 2005 to offer bigger bonuses for to encourage enlistment and re-enlistments for difficult to fill specialties including non-commissioned officers, intelligence experts, and civil affairs administrators.

National Guard also started paying recruiting assistants (RAs) cash bonuses of up to $2,000 for qualifying RAP enlistments. The RAs received the first $1,000 when the qualifying recruit enlisted and the balance when the soldier shipped off for training.

Obama administration audits in 2010 determined there was a problem with RAP “improper payments.” A task force formed with investigators from the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s Major Fraud Section, Army Criminal Investigative Command, and the Defense Criminal Investigative Services found thousands of bonuses and student loan payments were extended for Guard enlistees that did not qualify for RAP cash.

The Obama administration has stated that over 1,200 Army recruiters and 2,000 recruiter assistants are suspected of fraudulently granting 106,364 unqualified RAP payments to individuals. More than 200 officers are under investigation for knowledge of illegal RAP payments, including two generals and dozens of colonels.

The Pentagon’s National Guard Bureau has acknowledged that the RAP “bonus overpayments” occurred in every state National Guard unit. But California as the nation’s largest National Guard contingent with 17,000 active members, appears to have made the largest number of unqualified RAP payments.

According to California Guard audit official Colonel Michael S. Piazzoni, from fall of 2007 and to about October 2009, “The system paid everybody up front, and then we spent the next five years figuring out if they were eligible.”

Director of the Army Lt. Gen. William Grisoli told Stars & Stripes newspaper, investigators believe that up to $100 million in taxpayer money was lost to fraudulent RAP payments. About 104 criminal cases of recruiter incentive fraud have been adjudicated and 16 people have been imprisoned, including five National Guard recruiter assistants that each collected over $1 million in fraudulent bonuses.

California National Guard’s incentives manager Army Master Sgt. Toni Jaffe, pleaded guilty to the biggest recruitment fraud case in 2011, involving $15.2 million in “false claims against the United States.” She was sentenced to 30 months in federal prison and 3 Guard officers also pled guilty to criminal fraud. They all agreed to pay restitution.

With Lt. Gen. William Grisoli stated that the Army intends to recoup as much RAP taxpayer money as possible from the unsuspecting soldiers that did not know they were receiving unqualified RAP payments.

Nearly 10,000 California National Guard soldiers, many veterans of multiple combat tours, have now been ordered to repay their re-enlistment bonuses and interest charges. As a sign of the military collector aggressiveness, there are increasing reports of California National Guard soldiers being hit with wage garnishments and tax liens.

This piece was originally published by Breitbart.com/California