Karen Bass is back in the race

TIGHTENING IN LA — How excited was Karen Bass’ campaign about a new poll showing her in a toss-up against Nithya Raman? Excited enough to post about it at 1:36 a.m.

Just last month, the Berkeley IGS — Los Angeles Times poll showed Bass down 11 points against Raman, a walloping lead that cemented Raman’s status as the front-runner in the mayoral race. Closing a double-digit gap within a month would be a remarkable comeback for Bass, especially because her negatives remain ominously high, with 65% of likely voters viewing her unfavorably.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

But after a rough summer of campaign missteps and brutal headlines, Bass has caught a break in recent weeks, with Raman suffering a series of self-inflicted wounds, largely on public safety. The Bass campaign has alternately hammered her with accusations of being too far left on public safety — citing her appearance in a video with a social media influencer who referred to Los Angeles as a fascist city and her call to replace current police chief Jim McDonnell — and too complimentary of law-and-order former chief Daryl Gates.

Raman was slow to apologize for the Gates comment and offered contradictory answers on McDonnell’s future. The crime-focused news cycle dragged on for days, forcing Raman off her preferred framing of the race: a referendum on Bass’ tenure. Now, Raman’s favorability is underwater for the first time in that poll, with 49% of likely voters holding unfavorable views versus 42% who viewed her positively.

To the Bass campaign, the results are a validation of its recent strategy.

“It’s an affirmation of the past few weeks of Nithya being exposed as not being up for the job,” said Bass spokesperson Alex Stack.

The poll contains some warning signs for Bass. Raman leads among Democrats and independents, and has a slight edge among white and Latino voters. Bass’ strength is with Republicans and Black voters — an incongruous coalition that would not be enough alone to win in an overwhelmingly Democratic city where Black residents are less than 10% of the voting population.

Still, the Bass campaign was eager to tout the findings, a reversal from last month when it dismissed the Berkeley IGS survey as an outlier.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

LAPD chief becomes polarizing figure as Bass and Raman diverge on handling of police

  • Mayor Karen Bass has publicly backed LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, saying the Police Department could be thrown into disarray if he is removed before the 2028 Olympic Games.
  • Nithya Raman has called for a change in LAPD leadership without giving a clear timeline of when she would replace McDonnell if she defeats Bass in the upcoming mayoral election.
  • Bass selected McDonnell to lead the LAPD in 2024. His supporters say he has managed to steady a department beset by low morale, and that crime has fallen during his tenure. He has taken criticism for shootings by police officers and the use of aggressive tactics against protesters.

In the race to become L.A.’s next mayor, the city’s top cop — LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell — has become a lightning rod for debate.

The two candidates — incumbent Karen Bass and City Councilmember Nithya Raman — have staked out differing positions about how the Los Angeles Police Department has performed under McDonnell.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Raman has vowed to replace McDonnell, saying he has not “met the moment” given the department’s response to federal immigration raids. Bass has publicly backed the chief she hired two years ago, saying the LAPD could be thrown into disarray if McDonnell is removed before the 2028 Olympic Games.

Raman’s potential ouster of McDonnell and desire to push reforms on the LAPD has pitted her against the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the powerful union for rank-and-file officers that campaigned against Bass during her first election but is now backing her. The union has poured millions of dollars into attack ads against Raman, who has said she declined contributions from the organization in the past.

In an op-ed published in the Protective League’s monthly magazine earlier this year, union president Richard Mendoza called the Democratic Socialists of America, which has endorsed Raman, an “imminent threat to our members.”

Last week, Raman faced criticism for an Instagram video in which she appeared to slam McDonnell and the mayor, saying at one point “only you can stop fascist liars.” She later denied that she was referring to Bass or McDonnell, saying her remarks were improperly edited — and that she had the video pulled.

The Raman campaign did not respond to numerous requests for an interview about her vision for the LAPD.

Raman, a Harvard-educated urban planner, has sought to burnish her credentials as a political outsider by publicly calling for a change in LAPD leadership — but she hasn’t given a clear timeline on when she would replace McDonnell.

Click here to read the full article at the LA Times

War games and draft lawsuits: Democrats work to Trump-proof November election

  • Stepping in for an absentee Congress, Democratic attorneys general are ready to fight efforts to undermine or overturn the midterm balloting.
  • ‘We need to stay nervous and stay vigiliant,’ says Colorado’s Phil Weiser.

The office of Colorado’s attorney general is a perch 10 stories above downtown Denver. From his aerie, Phil Weiser has a sweeping view of the city skyline, the gold-domed Capitol and, occasionally, a red hawk on the wing.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

But looking toward November, Weiser sees something darker.

Federal agents swarming polling places. Voters intimidated or blocked from casting their ballots. A tyrannical president using his powers, real and imagined, to undermine or try to overturn the Nov. 3 election.

“With this administration what we have seen is it’s important that we not limit our imagination to what … type of harm could happen,” Weiser said during a sunny noon hour in the Mile High City.

For that reason, Colorado’s attorney general and his Democratic peers around the country have spent more than a year strategizing — by phone, via Zoom, sometimes in person — on ways to Trump-proof the midterm election.

They’ve researched history and the law, war-gamed what-ifs, divvied up responsibilities and drafted emergency lawsuits and temporary restraining orders so they can be hurried into court at a moment’s notice.

“We have prepared for a range of contingencies … so that we’re ready to act,” Weiser said.

“We’re not going to be reacting in real time” or pulling all-nighters, he added. “We are going to be following through on plans we’ve made, having looked at what’s possible.”

The efforts of Weiser, California’s Rob Bonta and more than 20 other Democratic attorneys general are part of a mass mobilization aimed at thwarting Trump’s unprecedented efforts to pervert and subvert November’s midterm balloting.

It’s remarkable that kind of man-the-barricades action is needed to preserve and protect the voting franchise in this, the land of the free and home of the brave. But having weighed the threats, Weiser said his greatest fear of election interference comes not from a bad overseas actor or some terrorist group, but rather our own federal government “and what this administration might do.”

So here we are.

To fend off that threat from within, state Democratic parties across the nation are aiming to recruit 10,000 volunteers to guard polling places in the event armed federal agents show up.

Various sponsors have launched education campaigns to explain election rules and offer hotlines for voters who have trouble casting their ballot.

Civil rights groups and democracy-defending organizations have staged their own tabletop exercises brainstorming and rehearsing various scenarios. A group of Democratic U.S. senators has done the same.

“What we’re doing is preparing for the fact that Donald Trump, in 2020, lied about the election in advance, lied about it in the aftermath, went to court … and then he instigated a violent insurrection in this very building,” Marc Elias, a Democratic elections attorney, told MS NOW in a July interview at the Capitol. “So I think we need to take these threats in the 2026 midterm run-up … both seriously and literally.”

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Seeking reelection, L.A. Mayor Bass calls herself ‘an activist fighting for change’

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, 72, is seeking a second term in the Nov. 3 election, after being forced into a runoff by City Councilmember Nithya Raman, a onetime ally.

A former state Assembly speaker and member of Congress, Bass became the city’s first female mayor in 2022, when she defeated billionaire developer Rick Caruso.

Once in office, she focused much of her energy on reducing homelessness and bolstering the ranks of the Los Angeles Police Department. In 2025, she faced sharp criticism over the city’s response to the January Palisades fire, and for being in Ghana when the fire began amid high wind warnings.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The Times spoke with her on the seventh floor of an apartment building under construction in West Los Angeles — one made possible by her order fast-tracking approval of affordable housing. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The Times: What is your single biggest accomplishment as mayor?

Bass: Well, it’s hard for me to narrow it to just one. But I do think this [building] is a perfect example of a huge accomplishment, which is affordable housing. And the fact that we have built more affordable housing in the four years that I’ve been mayor than was built many, many years before.

Really, the accomplishment was changing the rules and expediting [affordable] housing.

The Times: And what would you say is the biggest mistake you made while serving as mayor?

Bass: No question. Not being here for the fire, and being out of the country.

The Times: Why, or how, do you think that happened?

Bass: How do I think it happened that I was out of the country?

The Times: There were warnings about wind. There was concern about fire risk. Some on your staff received those warnings.

Bass: It happened in the city and in the county, that there were warnings. But no one thought those warnings elevated to a point of a crisis, or an impending crisis.

What you know about weather events is, any time we think there’s going to be a major concern, everybody comes together. There’s press conferences, there’s briefings, and the public is informed about what could possibly happen. That was not done in the city. That was not done in the county.

And when I came back and spoke to [then-Fire Chief Kristin Crowley] and said, “Why didn’t you raise the alarm?” — because she had done that for previous emergencies — she basically said, “Mayor, we get Santa Ana winds all the time. We just didn’t think it was going to be that bad.”

[Crowley has sued Bass, accusing her of defamation and damaging her reputation for her remarks about the Palisades fire response.]

So the bottom line is, I was not aware, otherwise I would have not left the country. However, it’s no excuse. The bottom line is, I wasn’t here when the city needed me. And that’s a pain point for me, that I was not where I should have been, where I was needed.

I always do the analogy of, if you’re out of town and a family member is hurt or sick, it doesn’t matter where you are or why you were out of town. What matters is you weren’t there when your family needed it. And the city is my family.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

What Do the State’s November Ballot Measures Propose to Do?

There will be 14 ballot initiatives on the November 3 statewide ballot

By Chris Micheli and Vincent Micheli

California voters will have to decide the fate of 14 measures on the November 3 statewide ballot. Nine of them were placed on the ballot by voters, while five were placed on the ballot by the Legislature. What do these fourteen measures do?

Below is a brief description and the proposition numbers that have been assigned to the ballot measures by the Legislature (Props. 1– 5) and the Secretary of State (Props. 37 – 45) that are on the November 3, 2026, General Election.

Prop 1 The Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2026

The Veterans and Affordable Housing Bond Act of 2026 (Senate Bill 417) is an $11.25 billion bond measure on the November 3, 2026 California general election ballot. It features $10 billion in general obligation bonds for affordable housing (these GO bonds rely on taxpayer dollars to pay back debt with interest) and $1.25 billion in revenue bonds for veteran home loans (these are self-supporting revenue bonds repaid exclusively through mortgage payments rather than the state’s general fund.). This measure was placed on the ballot by the Legislature.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Prop 2 Save for California’s Future Act

The Save for California’s Future Act aims to strengthen the state’s fiscal stability by increasing the constitutional cap on the state’s “rainy day” fund (the Budget Stabilization Account) from 10% to 20%. It mandates greater set-asides for state savings accounts during high-revenue years (especially during capital gains tax surges); excludes deposits into the Rainy Day Fund from the Gann Limit; and, extends the requirement that state funds be dedicated to paying down various state liabilities, including federal Unemployment Insurance loans and obligations to public schools. This measure was placed on the ballot by the Legislature.

Prop 3 Provides Permanent Funding for Schools and Healthcare by Extending Existing Tax on High Incomes. Initiative Constitutional Amendment

The initiative would make permanent the higher marginal income tax rates on income above $361,000 for single filers and $721,000 for joint filers. The initial tax rate in 2012 applied to incomes above $250,000 for single filers and $500,000 for joint filers. Prop. 3 would increase the threshold and tie it to inflation. This measure was placed on the ballot by voters.

Prop 4 Political Reform Act of 1974: public campaign financing: California Fair Elections Act of 2026

The initiative would repeal the ban on public funding of campaigns, which has been in effect since the enactment of Prop. 73 in 1988, thereby allowing the state or local governments to establish programs for the public funding of election campaigns. Current state law only allows charter cities to provide public financing for campaigns, and prohibits the state, counties, districts, and general law cities from adopting these programs. This measure was placed on the ballot by the Legislature.

Prop 5 Elections: recall of state officers

The initiative would change the recall process for state officers (and not local officials) by eliminating the election to pick a successor at the time of the recall election and providing that any vacancies due to a successful recall be filled according to the state constitution and state statute. It would also allow the recalled officer to run again for the same office at the special election, if one is held, but the measure would prohibit the recalled officer from being appointed to fill the vacancy. This measure was placed on the ballot by the Legislature.

Prop 37 Creates Loan Program for Middle-Income Buyers of Qualified New Homes. Initiative Statute

The California Middle-Class Homeownership and Family Home Construction Act is a proposed $25 billion state bond initiative. It authorizes the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) to issue revenue bonds for fixed-rate second mortgages covering up to 17% of the purchase price for qualified new homes. It has rules for home qualifications, buyer qualifications, and financial requirement. The bonds are to be repaid by the borrowers’ mortgage payments, rather than the state general fund. This measure was placed on the ballot by voters.

Prop 38 Authorizes Bonds for Immunology Research. Initiative Statute

The initiative would issue $8.4 billion in general obligation bonds to fund immunology and immunotherapy research. The initiative would require at least $4.2 billion in bond revenue to be used for research related to cancer, heart disease, and Alzheimer’s disease. The initiative would also authorize the state to enter into an agreement with a nonprofit institute dedicated to researching immunology and immunotherapy. This measure was placed on the ballot by voters.

Prop 39 Establishes Additional Voter Identification and Citizenship Verification Requirements. Initiative Constitutional Amendment

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

 

Michael Gates Can Win: Raises $100K at Fundraiser

Make Public Safety Great Again

Former Huntington Beach City Attorney and former Deputy Assistant Attorney General Michael Gates, a Republican, is running for California Attorney General against incumbent Democrat Attorney General Rob Bonta in the 2026 California Attorney General election.

Friday, June 26, at a  fundraising reception for Michael Gates, with Special Guest Ambassador Richard Grenell,  Gates raised $100,000.

This is indicative of a fundraising trend going forward, as Gates is campaigning on public safety as his top priority – something that has been eroded since Bonta’s appointment and subsequent election.

Gates is running a strong campaign and has already achieved a historic primary victory.

In California’s top-two “Jungle” primary, the top two candidates advance to the November general election regardless of party. Bonta and Gates advanced, defeating Green Party candidate Marjorie Mikels. Approximate final results:

  • Rob Bonta (D) (incumbent): 56.6% (4,978,431 million votes)
  • Michael Gates (R): 37.9% (3,336,367 million votes)
  • Marjorie Mikels (G): 5.4% (478,178 votes)

California’s Primary Election total turnout was high, with over 8.7 million votes counted in this race. Gates received a strong showing for a Republican in a statewide California race — especially in a top-two primary.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“I am proud to support his effort to restore accountability, public safety, and the rule of law in California, and I would be honored to have you with us for this important evening in Bel Air,” Grenell said on the invitation.

Indeed. Make Public Safety Great Again.

This California Attorney General Primary Results 2026 map speaks volumes, and goes a long way to explaining California’s red versus blue counties.

Gates’ was one of the strongest recent Republican performances in this office.

Michael Gates’ campaign for California Attorney General has shown solid grassroots and law enforcement support but remains significantly outgunned by incumbent Rob Bonta’s war chest, according to the Mercury News.

Since entering the race in early 2026, Gates raised approximately $1.03 million leading into the primary. Total direct contributions reported around $1.05 million. 

Bonta, in the same fundraising period, raised $605,000, but his overall campaign, built since his appointment as AG in 2021, had a war chest with over $6.4 million cash on hand.

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

 

Election 2026 updates: Democrat Becerra, Republican Hilton advance to CA governor face-off

Why the count will go on in California

California’s elections are never quite over on Election Day, and this year is no different.

The state’s big population and its universal vote-by-mail system add to the time it takes to count the large volume of ballots counties will receive.

In the 2024 general election, for instance, mail ballots accounted for a little more than 80% of the 16.1 million ballots cast that November. Typically, county election officials first process ballots received before Election Day as they roll in and post those results quickly.

But, under state law, mail ballots can be received at local election offices up to seven days after the election, as long as they are postmarked on or before Election Day. And officials must verify ballots before they can be counted.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

It’s typical for mail ballots counted in the days after the election to skew Democratic.

And in this election, Democratic voters appeared to be returning their ballots at a slower pace than in past elections, according to data from Political Data, Inc., a Democratic-aligned data firm, suggesting that the trend could be even more pronounced.

Where things stand

In the California governor’s race, Democratic former US Health and Human Services Secretary Xavier Becerra is in strong position to get one of the two slots in the November election given how votes counted after Election Day in California are typically more Democratic. The other slot is likely to go either Republican former Fox News host Steve Hilton or Democratic billionaire investor Tom Steyer.

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass advanced to the November election. Republican former reality TV star Spencer Pratt landed in second place behind Bass in the first reports, but later updates found him losing ground to progressive city councilmember Nithya Raman. That trend, coupled with the expected Democratic shift from ballots counted after Election Day, means the second spot remains too early to call.

Click here to read the full article at ABC News

What’s next in the still-undecided California governor’s race? Insiders weigh in

Inside California Politics) — With a new poll showing a new top candidate in the California governor’s race, Inside California Politics host Nikki Laurenzo spoke this week with two political insiders about the state of the campaign.

In that survey, conducted by Emerson College Polling in partnership with Inside California Politics, Democratic candidate Xavier Becerra took a narrow lead in the race.

Read more: New poll shows major shift in California governor’s race

Both analysts — Republican strategist Rob Stutzman and Democratic consultant Andrew Acosta — weighed in on whether Becerra’s viral KTLA interview could hurt the now-top-polling candidate.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“If you had seen a transcript of that with no names attached, you could easily conclude that was Donald Trump talking to a reporter,” Stutzman said of Becerra’s pre-interview question of whether it was for a “profile piece” and not a “gotcha piece.”

Stutzman addressed the role Dana Williamson’s plea deal will play in the race. He noted that Williamson’s attorney laid the conspiracy at the feet of Sean McCluskie, not Becerra.

“It certainly helps him a great deal, but it’s not going to stop his opponents from attacking,” Stutzman said.

Read more: Former Newsom, Becerra aide pleads guilty to 3 of 23 counts in corruption trial

Even though Tom Steyer’s support has shot up from 4% in December to 17% — and a virtual tie for second — in May, Acosta says the Democratic billionaire may have “hit a ceiling.”

“I think voters are like, ‘We’ve heard everything we can about Steyer. What’s left?” Acosta said.

Click here to read the full article at KTLA

Nearly 2 million ballots are on their way to Orange County voters

Orange County voters, your June 2 primary ballot is on the way.

Nearly 2 million ballots were picked up early Saturday morning at the county registrar of voters’ office in Santa Ana by the U.S. Postal Service and mailed to registered voters. Ballots should arrive in mailboxes as early as Monday, May 4, which is also when ballot drop boxes around the county will be open for eager voters.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Click here to read the full article in the OC Register

Deadly ICE shooting in Minnesota, affordability stir up California gubernatorial forums

  • Immigration was a central focus during two Saturday forums with the candidates vying to replace termed-out Gov. Gavin Newsom.
  • The 2026 contest to represent the state with the fourth-largest economy in the world was largely overshadowed last year because of wildfires, immigration raids and the special election to redraw California congressional districts. But with the primary less than six months away, the governor’s race is seeing new attention.

Just days after the fatal shooting of a Minnesota woman by a federal immigration agent, the Trump administration’s immigration policy was a top focus of California gubernatorial candidates at two forums Saturday in Southern California.

The death of Renee Nicole Good, a 37-year-old mother of three, inflamed the nation’s deep political divide and led to widespread protests in Los Angeles and across the country about President Trump’s combative immigration policies.

Former Assembly Majority Leader Ian Calderon, speaking at a labor forum featuring Democratic candidates in Los Angeles, said that federal agents aren’t above the law.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“You come into our state and you break one of our f— … laws, you’re going to be criminally charged. That’s it,” he said.

Federal officials said the deadly shooting was an act of self-defense.

Rep. Eric Swalwell (D-Dublin) noted that the president of the labor union that organized the candidate forum, David Huerta, was injured and arrested during the Trump administration’s raids on undocumented people in Los Angeles in June.

“Ms. Good should be alive today. David, that could have been you, the way they’re conducting themselves,” he said to Huerta, who was moderating the event. “You’re now lucky if all they did was drag you by the hair or throw you in an unmarked van, or deport a 6-year-old U.S. citizen battling stage 4 cancer.”

Roughly 40 miles south at a separate candidate forum featuring the top two Republicans in the race, GOP candidate and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco said politicians who support so-called “sanctuary state” policies should be voted out of office.

“I wish it was the 1960s, ‘70s, and ‘80s — we’d take them behind the shed and beat the s— out of them,” he said.

“We’re in a church!” an audience member was heard yelling during a livestream of the event.

California Democratic leaders in 2017 passed a landmark “sanctuary state” law that limits cooperation between local and federal immigration officers, a policy that was a reaction to the first Trump administration’s efforts to ramp up deportations.

After the campaign to replace termed-out Gov. Gavin Newsom was largely obscured last year by natural disasters, immigration raids and the special election to redraw California’s congressional districts, the 2026 governor’s race is now in the spotlight.

Eight Democratic candidates appeared at a forum sponsored by SEIU United Service Workers West, which represents more than 45,000 janitors, security officers, airport service employees and other workers in California.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times