The online dashboard calculates each city’s ability to pay its bills, based on risk factors such as pension funds and benefit obligations.
The state retirement system that oversees pension benefits for 2 million public employees, retirees and their families has long been described as a ticking time bomb, a looming crisis and a can that elected officials keep kicking down the road.
After swimming in cash following the halcyon dot-com boom in the 1990s, the state promised public employees more money and benefits than could realistically be paid out decades later, especially since many plans pledged to support retirees until their deaths. Overall, reports indicate that CalPERS – the California Public Employees’ Retirement System – is now hundreds of billions of dollars short.
In order to afford burgeoning payments to CalPERS, some cities have cut staff rosters, reduced program services and increased taxes. But other governments – drowning in debt – have also declared bankruptcy and scrapped their retirement plans.
It’s a statewide dilemma, but several Bay Area cities now face “moderate risk” of strained financial futures because of their unfunded pension obligations, according to the state auditor’s latest ranking of California’s 482 cities.
Regionally, Richmond earned the worst overall grade, landing 10th on the at-risk cities list for fiscal year 2020-21. Not far behind, Oakland ranked 11th and El Cerrito 13th. San Jose landed at No. 20.
Notably, each of these four cities has the undesirable honor of sharing the No. 1 spot – alongside more than 30 other cities – as local governments least prepared to tackle future costs of employee pensions and benefits.
The state’s online dashboard, created in 2019, provides a snapshot of financial health that allows Californians a transparent, digestible look into how their tax dollars are being spent. It calculates each city’s ability to pay its bills based on risk factors from the previous fiscal year, measuring general fund reserves, debt burdens, liquidity, revenue trends, pension funds and benefit obligations.
San Jose
Crafting a solution to looming unfunded pensions has plagued San Jose for years, resulting in two ballot measures to lower costs to taxpayers. San Jose’s pension and retirement costs declined with high returns on its investments, but funding to fulfill its current pension liabilities ranks second worst in California – only behind Compton.
The city’s $3.5 billion in pension liabilities accounted for 132% of the $2.7 billion the city collected as revenue in 2020-21 and last fiscal year’s $385 million CalPERS pension contribution swallowed up 14% of the city budget’s revenue.
Additionally, San Jose has only funded $5.9 million of its $9.5 million in accrued pension liabilities.
Jim Shannon, the city’s budget director, says he isn’t too worried. Pension costs are still higher than city officials would like – around 18% of the 2022-23 budget – but Shannon said San Jose is in a period of stability.
“I think we’ve taken our medicine and we’re in a pretty stable place – actually a better place than we have been in quite some time,” Shannon said.
Richmond
Richmond’s pension-related obligations exceed its annual $302 million in revenue by 173%, meaning that annual CalPERS payments “will likely strain the city’s financial resources,” according to data from the state auditor’s office.
While the city of 115,000 is one of the most troubled when it comes to preparing for future pension payments, Richmond Mayor Tom Butt cited a special tax that adds an additional charge on property tax bills that flows directly into benefits plans.
“We’re kind of in better shape, whereas some other cities might have to just take that out of their general fund,” Butt said. “Our special taxing mechanism that helps us pay sort of mitigates the problem.”
However, the state auditor’s dashboard shows that Richmond’s looming pension costs still pose a threat to maintaining city services and priorities at satisfactory levels.
This past fiscal year, CalPERS billed Richmond $37 million in pension contributions – accounting for 12% of the $303 million revenue flowing into the city’s coffers.
According to CalPERS’ projections, that payment will rise to $53 million – 18% of revenue – by 2028. And that’s based on current market conditions; a recession could hike those rates and deal a blow to revenues in the coming years.
While Butt places some blame for the hefty bills on labor unions that have negotiated generous pension plans, he said the state auditor’s dashboard legitimately points out danger signals.
“It is what it is and you can’t get out from under it, but it’s not a bleak financial future as long as Richmond has the revenue to pay these pension obligations,” Butt said. “So far, we’ve done it.”
Oakland
Similar to Richmond, Oakland also has a special tax to help pay pension liabilities. Yet, all of the city’s high-risk scores also revolve around being able to pay out those employee benefits.
Oakland ranks the 24th worst in the state for its more than $2 billion in pension obligations, which represent 140% of the $1.48 billion the city collected as revenue last fiscal year.
Last year’s $222 million contribution to CalPERS accounted for 15% of the city’s general fund revenue – a stat that ranks 11th worst in the state. By 2029, the payments are projected to be closer to 18%.
“These are universal problems, so to some extent, it does not surprise me, it does not alarm me,” Erin Roseman, Oakland’s director of finance, said. “It’s a problem that you can’t solve overnight, but it’s a long-term fix and we’re on our way there.”
Looking ahead, she said employees hired after 2013 will have a smaller financial impact on cities when they retire – thanks to state reforms of the generous packages offered in the past.
El Cerrito
Herculean efforts to cut city spending, a corrective action plan from the state auditor’s office and an injection of federal COVID funding helped build El Cerrito’s unrestricted general fund reserves from a negative $1.7 million to more than $7 million.
While this is the first year the city of just 26,000 residents has moved from “high-risk” to “moderate” since the dashboard launched, officials still face an uphill battle to fully fund employee benefits.
For fiscal year 2020-21, the city’s $70 million pension liability accounted for 123% of the city’s $57 million in revenues.
The city’s current obligations are more than all of the revenue flowing into its coffers, and city officials have only saved enough money to fund 78% of the $224 million in pension liabilities they must pay out. That is the 39th worst statewide.
Additionally, looking at pension costs, the city’s annual contribution to CalPERS – $7.7 million last fiscal year – accounts for 13% of all revenue streams, earning it the 21st worst percentage statewide.
Hoping to maintain momentum after avoiding insolvency and filing for bankruptcy, City Manager Karen Pinkos said officials are planning to set up a trust that would set aside money specifically earmarked for pension costs.