Gavin Newsom to Take Action on AI ‘Safety’ Before Leaving Office over ‘AI’s Potential Risks to Humanity’

Democrats are now realizing that AI is being used to reveal all of their fraud, and at breakneck speed

Governor Gavin Newsom’s communication mouthpiece posted there will be some big news tomorrow attached to this:

“Governor Gavin Newsom told POLITICO he plans to take further action on AI safety before leaving office, raising the possibility of a special California legislative session amid escalating concerns about the technology’s potential risks to humanity.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

And Politico announced:

Gavin Newsom told us he plans to take further action on AI safety before leaving office – raising the possibility of a special California legislative session amid concerns about AI’s potential risks to humanity.

In June 2026, California and Anthropic announced a statewide partnership that makes Claude available to state agencies and local governments at a 50% discount. Governor Gavin Newsom sold it as a first-of-its-kind deal to expand responsible AI use in government: help workers draft and summarize documents, analyze information, handle routine tasks, and improve public services—without replacing staff. Anthropic also provides free workforce training, technical assistance, and developer input on workflows.

The deal sits against a backdrop of federal tension: the Trump administration had restricted some Anthropic model rollouts and labeled the company a supply-chain risk, and Anthropic had earlier clashed with the Pentagon over contract terms on surveillance and autonomous weapons, Politico reported. California officials said that federal designation did not come up in their negotiations.

But far more interesting than Gov. Newsom answering to his tech overlords and big donors is Rob Pyers’ post:

He links to a Late Filing Report to the Secretary of State by the California Democrat Party showing huge contributions:

Anthropic PBC: $49,000

and

Anthropic PBC: $801,000

No word on what the Anthropic deal means for California’s data security, which has been historically a mind-boggling deficient problem.

In response to Sen. Josh Hawley’s post, I noted today on X that AI CEOs want indemnification. And Democrats are more concerned with what AI will uncover about them. Both should be liable.

Click here to read the full article at the California Globe

Newsom floats prospect of special session or executive action on AI

The California governor told POLITICO he plans to take further action on AI safety before leaving office.

SAN FRANCISCO — Gavin Newsom told POLITICO he plans to take further action on AI safety before leaving office, raising the possibility of a special California legislative session amid escalating concerns about the technology’s potential risks to humanity.

His plans, he said, could take the form of a special session, executive action or steps by state agencies under their existing authority.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“Is there a legislative play? Is there a framework around a special session in that respect? Is there executive action?” Newsom said, adding he was also looking at “authority within existing agencies that have oversight authority based on laws, rules, and regulations.”

“We’re looking at across the spectrum,” the governor said. “We’re looking to see what we can do in the next few weeks — days, weeks, and months.”

The California governor and likely presidential candidate described the car he was riding in during a Wednesday evening call as strewn with dozens of pages of ideas and memos focused on the issue.

“After that Hugging Face incident weeks ago, we were on this,” Newsom said, referring to the July incident in which rogue OpenAI programs executed an autonomous cyberattack. He said he has been in discussion with state legislative leaders, tech safety advocates and those representing AI labs, among others, in crafting a response.

Any additional move by California, the global locus of the tech and AI industry, could have major national and even global repercussions.

Newsom said he felt spurred to act in part because of “the tendency of the Trump administration to do absolutely nothing.”

His remarks come amid deep fissures in the industry — and in Washington — over how to regulate the industry, and with President Donald Trump repeatedly dismissing concerns about AI. In California, Newsom said, “We’re mindful that we need to continue to iterate and that we must continue to lead.”

Newsom’s signature last year on California’s first-in-the-nation AI transparency and incident reporting law set off a cross-country tour of copycat lawmaking in states like New York and Illinois. And last week he signed two AI safety bills to regulate the kind of third-party safety checks now being called for by the likes of OpenAI and Anthropic.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

Newsom admits democratic socialist ideas ‘mainstream’ in Democrat party: ‘Pretty aligned’

In an interview discussing his rumored 2028 presidential run, California Gov. Gavin Newsom asserted that the Democratic Party is “pretty aligned” with the Democratic Socialists of America (DSA), especially when it comes to universal healthcare, climate change and moving away from fossil fuel usage.

During an interview with “PBS NewsHour,” Newsom was questioned about what recent democratic socialist victories across the country mean for the Democratic Party.

“If you have these candidates and this platform that is clearly animating the base, energizing turnout, should more of those ideas be worked into the broader Democratic platform?” Newsom was asked.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“I think they are,” Newsom shot back. “I mean, we want money out of politics. I’ve been supporting clean money campaigns for decades.”

NEWSOM TELLS DEMOCRATS TO BE IN THE ‘ADDITION NOT SUBTRACTION’ BUSINESS WITH SOCIALISTS

The interviewer pressed Newsom further, saying, “There seems to be some distance between [Democratic] leadership and those DSA candidates.”

“But, not the ideas,” Newsom responded.

“I believe in universal healthcare, and I believe in Medicare for All, the party does overwhelmingly,” he said. “And so, if it’s about more money in your pocket, lowering costs, getting money out of politics, if it’s about Medicare for All, I think we’re pretty aligned.”

He added, “It’s about recognizing that we’ve got a planet that is getting hotter and drier and that we’ve got to address the issue of climate change, we want energy security, and we want to move off fossil fuels. That’s a DSA position, that’s a mainstream position within the Democratic Party.”

Newsom dismissed worry about democratic socialist influence in American politics, saying, “I think in many ways, it’s just a label … it’s just such a familiar label to me, we call them progressives.”

Click here to read the full article in FoxNews

California lawmakers strike wildfire deal that leaves out most of Newsom’s big demands

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday backed off his proposal to reduce costs for electrical utilities after their equipment sparks wildfires, agreeing instead to a narrower deal after homeowners, insurers and fire survivors argued his original plan would have shifted those costs onto them.

Instead, Newsom and Senate and Assembly leaders agreed on a narrower package of wildfire policies, including prohibiting private equity groups from investing in wildfire claims and denying utility CEO bonuses in the years their companies cause fatal fires.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The deal is a victory for lawmakers who refused to reduce damages to victims and shift costs away from utilities. Opponents included insurance companies, consumer advocates and survivors of the January 2025 Eaton Fire caused by Southern California Edison equipment that killed 19 people in Altadena.

Under the agreement announced Saturday, the state would create a “fast-pay” program for survivors’ property loss, pain and suffering in the wake of a utility-caused fire. It would include deadlines for determining which claims are valid within 60 days of receipt, and settlement offers within 30 days after that, but survivors could still pursue the long process of suing utilities if they choose.

The state also commits to  improving its local wildfire mitigation efforts and sharing more data on insurance coverage in areas with fire risk.

The final agreement, which lawmakers will vote on next week in Senate Bill 492, caps a contentious series of closed-door negotiations between Newsom’s office and legislative leaders on how much utility companies should pay after fires.

Newsom wanted utilities to have to pay less to insurance companies, some wildfire survivors, local governments and corporations claiming damages after a fire. His administration is concerned the mounting costs threaten investor confidence in the state’s three major for-profit utilities: Pacific Gas & Electric, Southern California Edison and San Diego Gas & Electric. He said that could lead to higher borrowing costs for the companies and higher electricity bills for Californians.

Newsom also argued his plan would prioritize paying survivors who lose their homes. In past fires, investors have funded lawsuits or claims have been sold to hedge funds, increasing the number of third parties seeking to profit from wildfire payouts, Newsom’s office has said.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

Insurance executives warn that Newsom plan to shift utility wildfire liability would raise premiums

Insurance company executives warned Gov. Gavin Newsom in a letter Wednesday that his plan to shift utility wildfire liability to property insurers would raise premiums across California.

“The party whose equipment ignites a catastrophic fire should bear the economic consequence of that fire,” the 15 executives wrote. “Shifting those costs to policyholders does not reduce the cost of electricity but does make homeownership more expensive and insurance coverage harder to find.”

As the legislative session nears its end, Newsom’s staff and lawmakers have been negotiating behind closed doors on a deal to limit utilities’ wildfire liabilities.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

According to a confidential document that Newsom’s staff sent to lawmakers and was obtained by Politico, the governor wants to stop property insurers from recouping their losses from homes destroyed in utility-sparked wildfires.

That could increase homeowners’ property insurance rates by as much as 50%, according to the Personal Insurance Federation of California. The highest hikes would be for those families living in severe fire risk areas.

“The proposal would shift billions of dollars in wildfire costs away from utilities and onto insurance consumers across the state, making coverage more expensive and harder to find,” said Denni Ritter at the American Property Casualty Insurance Assn.

Southern California Edison and the state’s two other big for-profit utilities have been lobbying Newsom and lawmakers to further shield them and their shareholders from wildfire liabilities ever since last year’s Eaton fire caused the price of their stock to tumble.

Government fire investigators said the fire, which killed 19 people and destroyed thousands of homes, was caused by electrical arcing on Edison’s out-of-service transmission line in Eaton Canyon. Edison kept the line in place despite not using it since 1971.

More than 11,000 households have filed suit against the utility, claiming it acted negligently, which the company denies.

Edison is offering settlements to victims of the Eaton fire. A $21-billion state wildfire fund that Newsom and lawmakers created in 2019 to protect the state’s three big utilities from bankruptcy after a fire is reimbursing Edison for its payments to victims.

At a news conference Wednesday, Newsom defended his plan, which also includes limiting the fees of attorneys in wildfire litigation and stopping hedge funds from profiting on the claims.

Newsom said that current law allows insurers to be paid before victims after a fire.

“The insurance industry is going to do everything to make sure they get paid first,” Newsom said.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

California to sue Trump administration again over mail-in voting restrictions

Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Monday that California intends to sue the Trump administration again over President Donald Trump’s efforts to impose new restrictions on mail-in voting ahead of the November midterms. The announcement came after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the administration to move forward with key parts of Trump’s March executive order on elections, pausing a lower court ruling that California and other states had previously won. Trump’s order called for the federal government to create state-by-state citizenship lists and for the U.S. Postal Service to impose new requirements on mail-in ballots.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The Supreme Court did not rule on if Trump’s order is legal. Instead, the decision allows the administration to continue pursuing the order while leaving the door open for California and other states to challenge specific policies as they are implemented — setting up another round of litigation just as mail-in voting will begin in some states. “California will be suing AGAIN to block these Orwellian rules from being implemented,” Newsom said in a news release. California and 22 other states, along with Washington, D.C., initially sued the Trump administration in April, arguing that the order illegally interfered with states’ constitutional authority to run elections. A federal judge agreed in June and blocked key parts of the order, finding that Trump had overstepped his authority. The judge also found that the Postal Service did not have authority to control mail-in voting.

Click here to read the full article in the Sacramento Bee

Gov. Newsom Wails Grimes: About Assaults on the Free Press, then Signs ‘Stop Nick Shirley Act’ into Law

‘California Passes a law making it a crime to report a crime’

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed the “Stop Nick Shirley Act,” Assembly Bill 2624, by Assemblywoman Mia Bonta (D-Oakland) into law Saturday August 22, 2026. Bonta claims her bill is about “privacy for immigration support services providers.”

Gov. Newsom two days ago screeched on X about unfair attacks on the free press:

“A free press cannot function under constant threats and retaliation from the government. Reporters must be free to hold those in power accountable — without fear of retribution. The assault on the free press must end!”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

And then he signed the “Stop Nick Shirley Act” into law. 

Republicans nicknamed the bill the “Stop Nick Shirley Act” for independent YouTuber and citizen journalist Nick Shirley after he exposed Somali daycare fraud in Minnesota. 

Bonta, wife of California’s Attorney General Rob Bonta, claims it does not fine or jail journalists simply for “uncovering” Democrat fraud.

However, her bill will fine citizen journalists a minimum $4,000 for exposing fraud inside “Immigration Support Service Providers” – illegal services to illegal aliens.

Bonta’s bill would impose huge civil sanctions on independent investigative reporters for “harassing” what Bonta calls “immigrant services” workers who, in fact, are providing taxpayer-funded goods and services to illegal aliens. It is designed to use as a weapon to intimidate and punish journalists who dissent from mainstream views.

AB 2624 is reminiscent of AB 2098 from October 2022 when Gov. Newsom signed a bill to censor California doctors accused of “Spreading COVID Misinformation” during Covid. Assembly Bill 2098 put unconstitutional restrictions on free speech by medical professionals, and subjected them to disciplinary actions by the Medical Board of California if they did not adhere to the “approved COVID treatment consensus.”

Even before AB 2098 went into effect, it was already used as a weapon to intimidate and punish doctors who dissented from “mainstream views.” However, the bill was ultimately ruled unconstitutional and the governor and COVID “experts” were defeated over their law to punish doctors for “Covid Misinformation.”

California legislators are trying to make investigating fraud illegal, as Elon Musk correctly noted on X.

Within days of announcing her new bill, Ms. Bonta claimed “Right-wing agitators, ineffective legislators, and Trump loyalists are intentionally spreading significant misinformation about Assembly Bill 2624.”

Assemblyman Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) calls it what it is:

CENSORSHIP: The “Stop Nick Shirley Act” that makes it illegal to post videos of fraud against taxpayers is now law. Democrats decided to stop independent journalists from investigating fraud instead of stopping the fraud.

DeMaio should know. On Wednesday, Assembly Democrats censored him on the floor of the Assembly during debate over Bonta’s bill.

“California Democrats don’t care about freedom of speech. They silenced @carldemaio when he attempted to debate the Stop Nick Shirley Act bill. Who is next?” I posted to X.

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

Newsom’s taxpayer-funded California diaper program could “lead to waste,” state records warned

Newborns outgrow their first diapers in weeks. Experts say so. California records show it, and several organizations that competed with Baby2Baby to run the state’s free diaper program made the same point.

One nonprofit pointed to a federal diaper pilot in California that found 83% of family requests were for Size 4 and up. Another warned that providing too many diapers of a single size “can lead to waste as babies may outgrow infant diaper sizes before they are used.”

Agency officials raised similar concerns with Baby2Baby, one of whose co-CEOs serves on the board of First Partner Jennifer Siebel Newsom’s California Partners Project. Baby2Baby ultimately won the multimillion-dollar contract to manufacture and distribute California-branded free diapers.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Officials questioned Baby2Baby about its plan to send every new baby home from the hospital with 300 to 400 diapers in only the two smallest sizes. They noted that that many diapers at once “might be overwhelming” and that parents “may want alternative sizes… so not to waste product.”

The Newsom administration went with Baby2Baby’s plan anyway. The recently released contract locks in 400 California-branded diapers for every baby, limited to Newborn and Size 1, handed over once at hospital discharge with “no right to return or exchange diapers.”

Continuing coverage of California’s diaper program

CBS California Investigates has been following the state’s no-bid Baby2Baby diaper deal since May, when our fact-check found the loudest criticisms of the program were wrong, but the state refused to release the contract.

The Newsom administration then delayed releasing the records for 66 days while lawmakers weighed giving agencies even more time to respond to requests like these.

In the meantime, the investigation revealed that what the governor called a “competitive bid process” was actually “non-competitively bid”. It was legal, exempted by a single sentence in the state budget, one of dozens of similar exemptions covering more than $1 billion in state contracts.

Six hours after that investigation was published, the state released the 356 pages of records.

Thirty minutes later, the governor’s office responded, calling our reporting “demonstrably false.” CBS California then published a point-by-point review, checking every claim against the state’s own records. That review also revealed that the governor’s proposed budget funded the Baby2Baby program at the expense of traditional diaper bank funding, which lawmakers later restored.

Click here to read the full article on CBS News

Newsom discovers the working class on his way out the door

Gavin Newsom is promising to do something he’s never accomplished before: Improve the lives of the working class.

Newsom has been campaigning for president most of the time he’s been California’s governor, with all his national and international appearances, podcasts and websites. Now he’s discovering the working class through Substack on his way to New Hampshire after seven years of failure.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“The world just got its first trillionaire. At the same time, millions of people are struggling to get by and a generation is falling behind their parents,” Newsom posted on X. “If that’s not a five-alarm fire, I don’t know what is”

The fact that younger generations are falling behind prior generations is not news, especially in California, where by the state’s own data the cost of living has increased by more than 30% since Newsom was elected governor in 2018.

The fire started here.

Newsom and his Democratic supermajority have presided over one of the highest poverty rates in the country. California leads the nation in homelessness, despite billions of dollars dumped into anti-homelessness programs. Middle income and working class families are fleeing the state – many of those he claims to be championing.

If California was Newsom’s audition, Americans shouldn’t expect him to perform better with a bigger job. His record suggests he has no idea how to actually help improve the lives of average Californians, and meaningless phrases like “democratize the economy to save democracy” just prove he’s flailing.

Newsom has increasingly pitted workers against the rich in an effort to appease the left wing of the Democratic Party. But it’s flawed logic. I’m not any better or worse off because of Jeff Bezos’ yacht – his net worth doesn’t drive up my rent and his stock portfolio didn’t give me the second highest energy prices in the country. What drives up rent and energy prices is a housing shortage created by permitting delays, and an energy policy that overtaxes every gallon I pump.

Nationally, worker wages have stagnated, whereas in California they’ve grown much faster. But this isn’t the talking point Newsom might think it is since wages gains are eroded by California’s rapidly rising cost of living. Groceries cost 11% more than the national average here. Gas costs 40% more. Electricity costs 61% more. A bigger paycheck got swallowed by even bigger bills.

Newsom says he’s pro-worker, but he signed into law AB 5, the most anti-worker law ever imagined that hinders the surest way to gain wealth and climb the economic ladder – entrepreneurship. And his environmental agenda will cost each California household around $20,000, according to a study by the Pacific Research Institute.

The real problem is not my relationship to a rich person, it is my relationship to the cost of living. Wealth isn’t a finite resource, which is why it continues to increase across all cohorts.

All of us can get richer at the same time, but Newsom’s framing assumes that wealth is a fixed pie and that my neighbor’s gain must be my loss. It isn’t how a growing economy works, and it’s not why Californians are struggling. But whether I make $1 million a year or $1 a year is irrelevant unless one considers what those salaries can purchase.

As governor, Newsom has had a lot of influence over things like housing costs, housing production, gas prices, electricity rates, insurance carriers fleeing the state, tax burdens.

At times Newsom has taken some actions that might serve to improve some of these issues, like suing cities over stalling housing production. But the vast majority of the time he elected to do nothing or make matters worse.

Click here to read the full article in the OC Register

Newsom’s populist act: Oppose state billionaire tax, embrace federal one

Gov. Gavin Newsom is in his populism era.

He started the year vowing to stop corporate investors from buying up large tracts of single-family homes, a desire shared by both socialists and President Donald Trump.

Last month, after he was unable to keep a proposal to tax California billionaires from appearing on voters’ ballots, he tried to get ahead of the debate by pitching nationwide higher taxes on the wealthy.

Last week, he spoke to a crowd of national Latino policymakers about the need to “democratize our economy” in the face of artificial intelligence-driven job losses.

Newsom’s populist appeals come as he prepares to leave office and looks toward an expected 2028 presidential campaign in which widespread anxiety about wealth inequality and the effects of AI on the economy will feature prominently.

“The old bargain is dead, and AI is going to finish it off,” he said last week in Los Angeles, of the concept that Americans could support families with working-class jobs. “We need to wake up to that foundational reality.”

The posture is new territory for Newsom, who is not a natural populist and who maintains his longstanding relationships with wealthy tech donors who have railed against the proposed billionaire tax, Proposition 40.

As governor, he’s kept his image as a liberal who favors progressive income taxes and expanding the social safety net without teetering too far into the overtly redistributive politics of democratic socialists. He eschewed most new tax proposals and stood by several state corporate tax benefits that progressives have longed to scrap.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

By focusing on AI-driven inequality now, Newsom is choosing a popular issue to define his expected 2028 run. But it’s not yet clear whether voters will buy his solution.

“Newsom is balancing two pressures,” said Kevin Liao, a Democratic strategist who worked on billionaire Tom Steyer’s “tax the rich” gubernatorial campaign this year. “There’s a desire to meet the demands of his constituents and the current appetite to be against billionaires, and to address the massive wealth inequality in the state and the country, with the cold political reality that much of his career and presumably his future ambitions have also been built on the financial support from a lot of wealthy folks in Silicon Valley.”

Four tax measures on the California ballot

Even as he adopts a more progressive posture while appearing in other states, Newsom is walking a fine line back home, where his vocal opposition to California’s billionaire tax proposal could confuse voters staring at multiple tax measures on the November ballot.

Proposition 3, sponsored by the California Teachers Association, is also a tax on the rich: It would make permanent the state’s higher income tax rates for the top 2% of earners. That money goes into the state general fund, 40% of which pays for schools.

Voters approved those rates temporarily in 2012 at the behest of then-Gov. Jerry Brown, and extended them again in 2016. If they expire as planned in 2030, the state stands to lose between $5 and $15 billion a year in revenue.

Early polling shows that measure is popular, but CTA President David Goldberg acknowledged it will be tricky to campaign in favor of it with another tax on the ballot. The union opposes the billionaire tax because it would not send the same proportion of its revenues to schools, instead prioritizing healthcare.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters