This affluent Bay Area region is booming. So is its homelessness crisis

Dianne Evans didn’t expect to become homeless for the first time in her 50s.

But after a bad breakup, the Navy veteran and longtime Livermore resident moved out of her then-boyfriend’s home and into her Ford Excursion. Renting her own place, Evans said, was out of reach.

“On a single income out here, I just couldn’t do it,” she said.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Now 64, Evans lives in a travel trailer she parks in quiet parts of Livermore. She keeps to herself most days and uses the Excursion to commute to San Jose for overnight shifts as a security guard.

Evans is among a growing number of unhoused people in Livermore, where homelessness has climbed even as several of Alameda County’s largest cities have reported declines.

Livermore’s homeless population grew from 277 people in 2024 to 343 this year, the largest increase in Alameda County, according to the latest point-in-time count. The city accounts for only about 4% of the county’s overall homeless population, but its rise — along with increases in neighboring Pleasanton and Dublin — stood out as Alameda, Oakland and Hayward saw notable drops.

The rise in homelessness in Livermore and other parts of the Tri-Valley — which encompasses Dublin, Pleasanton, San Ramon and Danville — comes as the region grapples with a population boom. The area is home to some of the fastest-growing cities in the state.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

Trump ally Roger Stone hired to lobby for Bay Area tribe seeking control of Presidio

Self-described “dirty trickster” and longtime Donald Trump ally Roger Stone has been hired to lobby for the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, a controversial group that last year petitioned the White House to take over management of the Presidio.

In a lobbying disclosure form filed on Monday, Stone’s firm, Drake Ventures, reported that the tribe had paid it $30,000 for services in the first quarter of this year and another $20,000 in the fourth quarter of 2025, according to public records. 

The filing, which doesn’t have any specific information about what the lobbying efforts consist of or whether it’s related to the Presidio, comes nearly two weeks after President Trump terminated the national park’s Board of Trustees

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

And it comes more than a year after Trump issued an executive order that threatened to “dramatically” downsize the park’s operations. After that executive order, the Muwekma Ohlone Tribe, which has been fighting for 45 years to be added to the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ official list of recognized tribes, called on Trump to “return the Presidio to indigenous care.” 

In a petition circulated last March, the nonprofit group, which has about 600 members and reported revenue of about $700,000 in recent years, said the 1996 Presidio Trust legislation that created the national park and laid out the bylaws and management structure should be repealed.  

“As the current administration works to eliminate the Presidio Trust as part of its effort to streamline the federal workforce, we stand ready to offer a cost-effective, environmentally responsible solution to filling the stewardship void,” tribal chairwoman Charlene Nijmeh said at the time.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

SF progressives pitch tax on ridesharing, CEO pay

The plan could be popular with the city’s liberal voters and labor unions.

The November 2026 ballot could be several pages long with the number of proposed state, regional, and local measures in circulation. 

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

In San Francisco, it’s all about transit.

State lawmakers from the Bay Area are pushing a new sales tax to fund regional services(opens in new tab), while Mayor Daniel Lurie is supporting a new parcel tax to shore up money for Muni(opens in new tab)

More recently, on Friday, progressive members of the Board of Supervisors pitched a measure(opens in new tab) to raise taxes on ridesharing services and CEO pay. Supervisors Connie Chan, Shamann Walton, Jackie Fielder, and Chyanne Chen signed onto the proposal. 

Many details are still unknown. Chan, who appears to be leading the effort, did not respond to a request for comment. 

One thing is clear: The measure will almost certainly provoke a fight between pro-business moderates and progressive factions at City Hall, who have competing visions for how to raise much-needed money for transit. 
Those who support the progressive effort will likely argue that the city needs a major cash injection to keep services running smoothly in the face of historic deficits.

Meanwhile, those backing the original two measures may be worried that a third tax would put too much of a financial burden on voters for one election year.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Standard

Gov. Newsom Signs Sen Wiener’s SB 79 to ‘San Francisco’ all of California

This is forced density without local input and control

California Governor Gavin Newsom just signed Senate Bill 79 by Democrat State Senator Scott Wiener of San Francisco, to force single-family neighborhoods to accept high-rise apartment buildings, overriding local zoning restrictions which ban dense development to favor “transit-oriented housing development.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Here is Governor Newsom’s juvenile response:

HUGE NEWS!! YIMBY’S REJOICE !! California is making historic strides today as @CAGovernor Gavin Newsom signs #SB79 — streamlining the building of more housing all across the Golden State. No, it does not supersede local control as some have falsely claimed. No, it is not one-size fits all. And no, this is not some “land-grab” by the state. This action sets the state up for success in addressing the affordability and building crisis happening right now!

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=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%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1976696091824603232&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fcaliforniaglobe.com%2Ffl%2Fgov-newsom-signs-sen-wieners-sb-79-to-san-francisco-all-of-california-with-apartment-housing%2F&sessionId=7481c33354799de6178345c8262c3f40f7c43680&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px

It’s all about the YIMBY’s – the “Yes in my backyard” outfit operating in nearly every California city as a non-profit.

Here is what YIMBY says it stand for:

  • addressing and correcting systemic inequities in California housing laws, and in related laws and regulations;
  • empowering Californians across the state to engage their elected representatives at the state and local levels on housing and related policies;
  • ensuring that California housing laws and local regulations are evidence-based, equitable and inclusive; and
  • drafting and advocating for proven legislative solutions that accelerate the pace of home building.

Building back better, faster, and more sustainably

More homes near transit

Renewing the dream of homeownership

But YIMBY and Sen. Wiener actually dream of destroying California suburbs, because suburbs are where people flee from the cities, from apartment living, from crappy schools, from living on top of each other in dense housing.

Take note that in August, the Los Angeles City Council voted 8-5 to oppose SB 79, calling it a “Sacramento attempt to hijack local planning,” silencing residents, Palisades News reported. Los Angeles and Pacific Palisades are right.

As many who have followed the long path of SB 70 have concluded, all of the six-story apartment buildings built next to a single family home will probably be luxury housing, no matter what is said by Sen. Wiener and Gov. Newsom. Developers can’t afford to build subsidized “affordable housing” in established residential neighborhoods.

Wiener’s latest housing bill “requires a housing development project within a specified radius of existing or currently proposed major transit-oriented development (TOD) stop, be an allowable use on a site zoned for residential, mixed, or commercial development, if the housing development meets certain requirements. This bill also allows a transit agency to adopt TOD zoning standards for district-owned land located in a TOD zone.”

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

‘The end is coming’: San Francisco’s biggest mall is effectively dead. Will it become something else?

On the edge of the food court at the bottom of San Francisco’s largely empty downtown mall at Market and Fifth streets, Sam Argueta is waiting for the inevitable. 

Argueta, 66, has owned a shoe repair shop at San Francisco Centre for about a decade. Before the mall’s customer base evaporated during the pandemic, Argueta usually had five other people working in his store, Shoe Wiz. Now, it’s just him most days.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

As the mall endured a relentless wave of store closures in recent years, emptying out the vast majority of the building’s 1.5 million square feet of retail and office space, Argueta thought about joining the exodus. But he doesn’t have the money to move his shop.

“We’re waiting to see what’s going to happen with the mall — eventually, (it’s) going to close,” Argueta said. “I know the end is coming one of these months.”

The mall’s deterioration is a potent symbol of the economic malaise that has plagued San Francisco’s once-vibrant shopping district since the pandemic began. But while nearby Union Square has seen some new businesses moving in, the San Francisco Centre is locked in a death spiral. An auction of the troubled mall, now controlled by lenders after prior owners Westfield and Brookfield Properties walked away in 2023, has been repeatedly postponed. It’s currently scheduled for Aug. 21. 

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

Immigration arrests in San Francisco region up 77% since Trump took office

These four charts show how ICE activity has changed in Trump’s second term

Since President Donald Trump took office in January 2025, Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests have shot up 77% in Northern California since the last year-plus of Joe Biden’s administration, according to recently released data from ICE.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The sharp rise in immigration enforcement comes amid the Trump administration’s push to deport millions of immigrants lacking permanent legal status. The effort has even strained the ability of sanctuary communities, such as Santa Clara County, to resist ICE arrests in their area.

From January through May of this year, there have been an average of 334 monthly arrests in the San Francisco Area of Responsibility. That area includes arrests in all of Northern California from the Central Valley to the Oregon border, as well as enforcement in Hawaii, Guam and Saipan, according to ICE.

In the last 15 months of the Biden administration, monthly arrests in the same area averaged 189.

The San Francisco spike is slightly less dramatic than the spike in enforcement nationwide, where monthly arrests averaged 9,300 from September 2023 through December 2024, and have grown 90% to 17,800 monthly arrests since January 2025.

The data was acquired by the Deportation Data Project, a group of academics and lawyers aiming to make immigration data public through Freedom of Information Act requests. Arrest data goes from September 2023 through June 10, 2025.

Officials from ICE did not respond to a request for comment from the Bay Area News Group.

The spike in arrests is not unprecedented, said Caitlin Patler, an associate professor of public policy at the University of California, Berkeley – in 2017, she noted, there was a “very dramatic” spike in arrests at the beginning of Trump’s first term. But it is unusual and has sparked fear among immigrant communities as waiting lists for legal assistance grow and calls of potential ICE sightings to rapid response hotlines surge, according to local immigrant assistance nonprofits.

The biggest changes to immigration enforcement nationally since January, Patler said, include revoking policies that blocked immigration enforcement from entering certain protected sites such as schools and churches, as well as increased collaboration with local law enforcement and partnerships with other federal agencies.

Click here to read the full article in the Mercury News

Exclusive: S.F. DA launches criminal probe into nonprofit that misspent millions


City prosecutors have launched a criminal investigation into the nonprofit San Francisco Parks Alliance, a prominent fundraiser for the city’s open spaces that admitted last week to misspending at least $3.8 million, the Chronicle has learned.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

An investigator with the San Francisco District Attorney’s Office contacted at least two people with ties to the Parks Alliance after the Chronicle began revealing the breadth of the organization’s financial crisis on April 28. The investigator is assigned to the office’s special prosecutions unit, which handles public integrity, corruption and other types of cases. The unit is part of the white-collar crime division.

One of those contacted by the office was Nicola Miner, a philanthropist whose family’s charity, the Baker Street Foundation, gave $3 million to the Parks Alliance to help develop Crane Cove Park in the Dogpatch neighborhood. The Parks Alliance admitted in an email to her foundation last week that it had improperly spent $3.8 million in restricted funds on its operating expenses, including about $1.9 million donated by Baker Street for Crane Cove.

The Chronicle agreed not to identify the second person who said they were contacted as part of the investigation in accordance with its anonymous sources policy.

A spokesperson for District Attorney Brooke Jenkins would neither confirm nor deny the office was investigating.

Parks Alliance CEO Robert Ogilvie declined to comment Monday, saying that he needed to consult with his attorneys. “This is the first I’m hearing about it right now,” said Ogilvie, who the nonprofit hired in February.

The Chronicle also confirmed Monday that the San Francisco City Attorney’s Office has begun its own investigation into the Parks Alliance, which could lead to the city suing the nonprofit or prohibiting it from obtaining city contracts, depending on the probe’s findings.

“The recent reports of financial mismanagement at the Parks Alliance are extremely troubling,” said Jen Kwart, a spokesperson for the city attorney. “We are looking into the matter to ensure public resources are used appropriately.”

The investigations are the latest blows to an organization whose board over the years has included a who’s who of City Hall fixtures and their relatives. The Parks Alliance is viewed as a crucial fundraiser for parks and open spaces in San Francisco, but has struggled to keep up with its bills in recent years as its funding dried up, leaving many small businesses and organizations that depend on it waiting to get paid.

The nonprofit acts like a bank for more than 80 smaller community organizations that take care of parks, playgrounds and other open spaces. It manages their books so that they can collect donations without hiring staff or getting nonprofit status on their own. It also serves as a conduit for private donations to pass through to city projects.

Some of its smaller partners told the Chronicle they have waited months to get reimbursed for expenses as low as $100, despite having thousands saved up at the nonprofit.

The unnamed source contacted by the district attorney this month is a representative of one of the community partners that struggled to get reimbursed by the Parks Alliance. They said they were asked how they became aware of the financial mismanagement and whether they had evidence of the Parks Alliance misusing restricted funds.

Ogilvie apologized to Parks Alliance supporters in an email Monday for the “lack of communication, transparency and accountability that has come from the organization in the past,” saying that the nonprofit had made “significant” improvements in the last month.

The CEO said the Parks Alliance is working to repay all of its debts to its community partners by the end of the year and asked them to limit their spending.

“Any new donations and grants moving forward that are earmarked for your organization (are) secured and allocated for your use,” Ogilvie wrote.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) secretly paid for his own monument inside San Francisco’s City Hall, according to a book released Tuesday.

Fool’s Gold: The Radicals, Con Artists, and Traitors Who Killed the California Dream and Now Threaten Us All, written by Susan Crabtree and Jedd McFatter, alleges that Newsom arranged for a bronze bust of himself to be sculpted inside City Hall to commemorate his term as mayor, using funds he controlled.

Newsom then allegedly feigned ignorance of the identity of the private donors who funded the bust, as well as some uncertainty about its design.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Other mayors have also been honored with busts inside City Hall. The funds for Newsom’s bust were to be donated by private individuals.

“Behested payments” are donations to charitable causes that politicians in California often ask donors to make on their behalf. They are widely considered corrupt, especially when the payments provide some benefit to the politician. (Newsom, for example, has requested payments to a project controlled by his wife, Jennifer Siebel Newsom.)

Co-author Jedd McFatter contends:

An analysis of Newsom’s “behested payments” reveals that between late 2015 and early 2016 three private organizations each donated to a nonprofit called Community Initiatives. As it turns out, two of those payments came from companies owned by Newsom—Balboa Cafe Partners and PlumpJack Management Group. Newsom’s companies specifically earmarked these behested payments for “Mayoral Bust at San Francisco City Hall.”

According to the California Fair Political Practices Commission, Balboa Cafe Partners donated $5,000 in 2016 toward the mayoral bust, and PlumpJack donated the same amount. Newsom is involved in both companies.

Click here to read the full article in BreitbartCA

Is ‘drug tourism’ driving homelessness — or is it an easy scapegoat?

Rudy Batka never learned to read or write. With a lingering infection in his hip, he can hardly walk either. He’s homeless and rarely travels far from San Francisco’s troubled Sixth Street corridor, where he buys his drugs. 

Roughly 2,800 miles away in Hernando County, Florida, his mother, Mildred Batka, hasn’t heard from him in more than a year. In her backyard, she keeps a trailer with a bed inside — just in case he returns home one day.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“Is he eating?” Mildred asked The Standard by phone. “I always thought the worst, that I would have to go to California to pick up his ashes. … I can’t imagine how he’s living.”

Rudy is just one of potentially thousands of people who have moved to San Francisco without housing, in what the city says is a growing phenomenon. 

The mild climate, multitude of social services, and culture of acceptance have long made San Francisco a destination for those on the margins of society. But the most recent Point in Time count, a controversial method for measuring the homeless population, shows that the trend of unhoused people moving to the city has accelerated in the past two years.

Of 952 homeless people surveyed, 20% said they were previously housed in another Bay Area county, 10% were from another California county, and 11% were from out of state. Meanwhile, the share of people who became homeless while living in the city has dropped to 59% from 71% in 2022.

Mayor Daniel Lurie has made the issue a linchpin of his administration, promising to crack down on “drug tourism” since the early days of his campaign.

Kunal Modi, Lurie’s homelessness chief, highlighted the data in an X post Jan. 29, before starting work in the mayor’s office. He vowed to expand the city’s homeless relocation programs and push other counties to build more shelter and housing. 

“Our residents are generous,” Modi wrote. “But it’s not sustainable for SF to be the services hub for the region.”

Click here to read the full article in the San Francisco Standard

How S.F.’s city attorney is preparing to fight against Trump’s policies

Sixteen years into his political career, City Attorney David Chiu is about to face what could be his greatest test yet: defending San Francisco against legal broadsides from President-elect Donald Trump. 

Chiu, 54, is expected to play a prominent role in a courtroom campaign to push back on Trump if he targets liberal cities such as San Francisco, possibly by trying to withhold federal funds over sanctuary policies he opposes as he seeks to carry out mass deportations of undocumented immigrants.

Click here to SUBSCRIBE to CA Political Review 

The legal resistance for Democrats such as Chiu may be more difficult than the last time Trump was in office. While Chiu’s predecessor, Dennis Herrera, was broadly successful in his many legal fights against Trump during his first term, experts say the president-elect and his staff have learned from some of their mistakes the last time they held the White House. They will also benefit from having Republican control of both chambers of Congress and a Supreme Court with a conservative supermajority.

Chiu, a former supervisor and state Assembly member who has been City Hall’s top lawyer since 2021, is preparing for a fight on multiple fronts — and believes he and the city are ready to prevail.

“Trump has said he is going to go after anyone and any jurisdictions that do not do what he wants and has suggested everything up to criminal prosecutions,” Chiu said in a recent interview at his City Hall office. “So there’s a lot of concern around the country around what that means. But … we have to stand up for our communities and we will.”

Chiu said he’s already been meeting with “cities and counties across the country that are preparing for what we’re expecting will happen to our communities.”  He’s appointed a deputy city attorney, Mollie Lee, to focus on Trump-related legal matters. And he’s among a group of city attorneys and county counsels from across the state who are asking the Legislature to allocate $10 million to help them defend their jurisdictions against Trump.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle