‘The landscape has changed dramatically’: States defy the tech lobby on AI rules

State legislators are emboldened by rising public outrage, ineffective pushback from Washington and a surge of pro-regulation dollars — and tech lobbyists are throwing in the towel.

The tech industry’s effort to stop states from regulating artificial intelligence is on the verge of collapse, as legislators from across the country lose their fear of Silicon Valley.

Interviews with more than a dozen state lawmakers, tech representatives and AI regulation advocates revealed a defiant mood sweeping through statehouses. Legislators are increasingly ignoring warnings from the tech lobby and its Washington allies about an unworkable “patchwork” of conflicting laws — and are instead preparing bills to address the safety of advanced models, new AI auditing standards, chatbot protections for kids and the impact of data centers.

California to sue Trump administration again over mail-in voting restrictions

Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Monday that California intends to sue the Trump administration again over President Donald Trump’s efforts to impose new restrictions on mail-in voting ahead of the November midterms. The announcement came after the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the administration to move forward with key parts of Trump’s March executive order on elections, pausing a lower court ruling that California and other states had previously won. Trump’s order called for the federal government to create state-by-state citizenship lists and for the U.S. Postal Service to impose new requirements on mail-in ballots.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The Supreme Court did not rule on if Trump’s order is legal. Instead, the decision allows the administration to continue pursuing the order while leaving the door open for California and other states to challenge specific policies as they are implemented — setting up another round of litigation just as mail-in voting will begin in some states. “California will be suing AGAIN to block these Orwellian rules from being implemented,” Newsom said in a news release. California and 22 other states, along with Washington, D.C., initially sued the Trump administration in April, arguing that the order illegally interfered with states’ constitutional authority to run elections. A federal judge agreed in June and blocked key parts of the order, finding that Trump had overstepped his authority. The judge also found that the Postal Service did not have authority to control mail-in voting.

Click here to read the full article in the Sacramento Bee

Conservatives flip script on Newsom after he demanded 25th Amendment for Trump: ‘Propped up a vegetable’

The California governor accused the president of cognitive impairment, drawing fierce pushback from Republicans online

California Gov. Gavin Newsom ignited an online firestorm on Thursday evening when, in response to President Donald Trump’s election integrity speech, he suggested that it was time to invoke the 25th Amendment and remove the president for displaying what he described as cognitive impairment.

“The only thing missing in Donald Trump’s speech was tin foil. This was a legitimate 25th Amendment moment — the rambling of a mad king,” Newsom said.

Newsom’s call to use the 25th Amendment plays into preexisting calls from Democrats to examine Trump’s cognitive performance, but also sparked controversy online about how Democrats could seriously question Trump’s mental state when they dismissed similar concerns about now-former President Joe Biden.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The 25th Amendment, ratified in 1967, allows the Cabinet to deem the president unfit for duty or allows Congress to establish an independent body to make that call.

To some critics, that case was much stronger under the last administration.

“You literally propped up a vegetable and lied to the American people about his cognitive decline for four years and never mentioned the 25th amendment once,” the official Republican National Committee X account wrote in response, referring to Republican doubts that Biden had the mental acuity to run the country at age 82.

“Given Newsom’s defense to this day of President Biden, calling him one of the greatest presidents ever, there’s a saying around sitting this one out that applies here…” Fox News contributor Joe Concha wrote on X.

“Gavin Newsome wants to remove [Trump] from office for disclosing California could have tens of thousands of aliens illegally registered to vote and that China attacked 220 million voters,” Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said.

Trump addressed the country on Thursday evening, informing the public that his administration had discovered a series of weaknesses in election integrity.

In particular, Trump said newly declassified documents would reveal foreign data theft carried out by China, that members of the U.S. government had known about election vulnerabilities for years, that Americans had been misled about those weaknesses and new evidence of “election fraud.”

Fox News Digital could not independently verify the content of the documents that were released by the White House.

Like many Democrats, Newsom cast doubt on the motives behind Trump’s speech, which came just four months ahead of the November midterms.

Click here to read the full article at FoxNews

 

Trump accuses California of registering thousands of noncitizen voters; Newsom scoffs

Shortly after making an address to the nation alleging widespread voter security breaches and election interference by China Thursday, President Donald Trump said his administration has notified California that it is one of four states with more than 250,000 non-citizens registered to vote collectively between them.

“State election officials in California, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and Nevada have been notified of this serious threat to national security and DHS (Department of Homeland Security) stands ready to support their efforts to identify and remove ineligible registrants,” according to a Department of Homeland Security document released Thursday night after Trump’s speech.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

California Gov. Gavin Newsom responded on X that “We have no idea where this latest claim comes from. The Federal Government sued (and lost) to get access to the state’s voter rolls. And if they already had them, why sue in the first place?”

Newsom was referring to a Department of Justice lawsuit against California and five other states seeking sensitive voter information. A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit in January.

Newsom continued: “California law is clear: You MUST be a U.S. citizen to vote in state and federal elections. Voter fraud is EXTREMELY RARE — and almost always committed by U.S. citizens. Donald Trump’s Administration has repeatedly pushed false and misleading claims about elections. They have provided NO evidence to support these new ‘claims.’ Why should anyone believe them now?”

Congress passed a law in 1996 prohibiting noncitizens from voting in federal elections, but California, Maryland, Vermont and Washington, DC allow noncitizens to cast ballots in some local elections.

In 2016, San Francisco voters authorized noncitizen parents or guardians of students who live in the San Francisco Unified School District to vote in school board elections. Oakland voters followed suit in 2022. A Superior Court judge initially overturned San Francisco’s law, but the state’s First District Court of Appeal rejected the determination that it was unconstitutional and reinstated the measure, allowing Oakland’s law to continue also. The conservative group that had challenged the law said it would not further challenge the law.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

Trump chips away at CARB, yet again

With help from Marisa Guerra Echeverria

PARTS PROBLEM: The Trump administration has left no stone unturned in its push to dismantle California air regulators’ influence.

The most recent hit came last week, when the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it would end a longstanding practice of allowing California to act as the de facto national regulator of aftermarket car parts.

This matters because the state has long policed aftermarket parts that can inadvertently or intentionally affect emissions controls on cars and trucks, causing them to spew more pollution into the air that harms public health.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The California Air Resources Board, the powerful regulatory agency that wields that power, is a frequent target of President Donald Trump. He’s often framed it as fueling an affordability crisis through its climate and air pollution policies.

“Unsurprisingly, the CARB process is faulty and backlogged, and its certification takes 12 to 18 months to complete,” the EPA said in its announcement about the changes. “These delays have left small businesses, the majority of aftermarket suppliers, sidelined while Chinese counterfeits flooded the market.”

The Trump administration is instead handing that authority to an industry trade association, the Specialty Equipment Market Association, that has, at times, butted heads with California state officials.

Some environmental groups are skeptical of the move — especially since the industry association was among the most vocal supporters of Republicans’ maneuver to revoke California’s EV standards last year.

“Outsourcing certification to the industry is a textbook example of putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop,” said Bill Magavern, policy director at the Coalition for Clean Air. “It reeks of conflict of interest to have the industry in charge of certifying the aftermarket parts, and it opens the door to tampering.”

The federal government has long deferred to California, which has by far the largest team of vehicle emissions-testing staff in the nation, to certify that aftermarket parts comply with the Clean Air Act. Now, parts makers can go to SEMA, which represents over 7,000 companies across the aftermarket parts industry, to receive approval.

While the change will apply to the other 49 states — CARB still has the power to test and certify aftermarket parts sold in California — the move fits into the larger pattern of the administration and congressional Republicans blunting the Golden State’s historically significant power to influence car markets nationwide.

CARB officials have countered the basis of the EPA’s latest broadside, arguing that the state’s program for certifying vehicle modifications does not apply nationwide or include replacement parts that meet original manufacturer specifications.

CARB spokesperson John Swanton said in a statement that EPA’s announcement “falsely claims California’s certification process [in place for more than 50 years] takes 12 to 18 months to complete. The fact is it takes an average of 90 days.”

Karen Bailey-Chapman, SEMA’s senior vice president for public and government affairs, said the group “agrees to disagree” with CARB’s assessment of the certification timelines, arguing that its internal data shows a process that takes an average of 12 months, if not longer. She said that the delay creates confusion and hurts small manufacturers competing with unscrupulous businesses that sell copycat parts and avoid the testing hurdles.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

President Trump Celebrates America’s 250th While Gavin Newsom Whines

No one will remember Gavin Newsom in 100 years, but Donald Trump will go down in history as one of America’s greatest presidents

While you were celebrating the Fourth of July semiquincentennial celebrations, America’s 250th birthday, grilling hot dogs and hamburgers, and smoking try-tip, while the kids and grandkids were splashing in swimming pools, and while families joined in parades, California Governor Gavin Newsom could only think of one thing – himself.

As President Donald J. Trump was putting on the greatest fireworks show in American history, and thousands of Americans visited the Great American State Fair in Washington D.C., California’s whiny governor posted a video carping about Donald Trump, and projecting his own corruption onto America’s President.

“250 years ago, our founders gave voice to one of the most radical sentences ever written: ‘We the People.’ Today, that idea is under attack,” Gavin Newsom said. 

Tell that to the thousands upon thousands of Americans at the Great American State Fair, and the thousands who stayed for the 850,000-shell fireworks show.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Newsom claimed that Trump:

  • He’s embraced gerrymandering to entrench minority rule
  • Donald Trump and his allies are pushing voter suppression laws across the country
  • Donald Trump and his allies are trying to end birthright citizenship
  • Donald Trump is threatening to use the military and law enforcement against his political opponents

Notably, Newsom just redistricted California to gerrymander and eliminate the votes of specific Republican-leaning areas, something the Founding Fathers fought against.

I don’t think the Founding Fathers would care much for Gavin.

What actually was under attack was California – “Fourth of July descended into mayhem across Southern California as unruly crowds overwhelmed packed-out fireworks displays, looted stores, ignited fires and saw cops charge on horseback,” the California Post reported. “Officers were swarmed by hundreds of people who hurled bottles and other debris at them before the crowd turned on one another and began fighting.”

Compare Newsom’s ridiculous speech, tearing down what he himself is incapable of building, to President Trump’s at the Salute to America Celebration July 4, 2026, praising America, our flags that flew at Saratoga and Yorktown, the founders, American explorers, our military Medal of Honor recipients, and our armed forces: Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force.

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

Trump administration to probe California’s powerful coastal watchdog

The Trump administration is planning a review of the powerful California Coastal Commission and other state regulatory agencies that deal with the state’s shoreline, saying they’re likely out of compliance with the nation’s coastal management laws — an assertion critics say is merely a pretense to weaken their authority.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick directed the review in a recent letter to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. He alleged that California regulators were making decisions about development and other activities without giving due consideration to military plans and possibly many other federal interests, including offshore oil and gas drilling.

By initiating an assessment of California’s federally approved coastal management program, and the agencies that execute it, the administration is opening the door to changing how much say the state has over federal and federally licensed projects — from dredging harbors to developing wind farms in the ocean to building undersea pipelines.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Coastal management programs, which ensure states have a voice in federal planning, are periodically reviewed and lightly modified under the federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. But because a review of California’s program had been nearly completed under the Biden administration, the Commerce Department’s call for a new review, on top of its stark criticism of the state, have some in California worried the agency is looking to make major changes.

“This is not a routine review,” said Richard Charter, a longtime oceans advocate and director of the Local Government Outer Continental Shelf Coordination Program, a coalition of coastal cities and counties opposed to oil development. “This is a targeted effort to remove the defenses of the California coast.”

The review comes as the Trump administration has tangled with California over a number of issues, not the least of which is the expansion of offshore oil and gas drilling. Many in the state oppose new fossil fuel development along the coastline, fearing harm to the ocean and an acceleration of climate change.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

Newsom vows 100 percent tax on DOJ ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ payouts

His pledge mirrors Democratic efforts in New York and New Jersey.

SACRAMENTO, California — Gavin Newsom vowed Wednesday to tax any payouts that California residents receive from a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund that Donald Trump secured in a settlement with his own Justice Department, as Democratic lawmakers in states across the country ramp up efforts to counter the president on the measure.

“Anyone from California that receives any of those funds, we want to tax 100 percent of those proceeds,” the California governor told reporters during a press conference in his office, calling the settlement a “slush fund.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Newsom’s pledge mirrors legislation unveiled earlier this week in New York by Democrat Alex Bores, a state assemblymember and House candidate, that would assess a 100 percent tax against payouts from the fund. Trump announced the fund last week as part of his $10 billion settlement with the DOJ in his lawsuit against the IRS, and Democratic efforts to undercut any payouts are picking up across the country.

Democratic state lawmakers in New York are pushing for a vote by next week to fully tax payouts from the fund. Queens state Sen. Mike Gianaris in an interview said his measure was in the process of being introduced in the Democratic-dominated Legislature.

“There’s widespread, bipartisan agreement that this is baldfaced corruption at its worst and if we have the ability in New York to combat it by ensuring that none of this money benefits anyone in our state’s borders, I’d expect there’d be widespread support for that idea,” he said.

Bores in a text message Wednesday night said he was working on getting his bill put up for a vote next week as well. Time is running short in Albany, where lawmakers are scheduled to end their legislative session late next week and will have a heavy docket of bills to approve.

In New Jersey, a Democratic state lawmaker said he was already working to draft a bill to set up a 100 percent tax on recipients of the funds.

“I think it’s brilliant — because the slush fund is completely corrupt and utterly appalling,” state Sen. Andrew Zwicker, a member of his chamber’s Budget committee, told POLITICO in an interview. “I think it’s a brilliant counter move to Trump’s corruption.”

Democrats and even some Republicans have blasted the fund. Trump didn’t consult lawmakers before announcing it and refused to rule out payouts to people who were convicted of crimes in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the Capitol. Congressional Democrats have proposed their own legislation aimed at countering the fund.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

Latinos in California are mad at Trump. Their votes for Democrats’ gerrymandering show it

California’s primary election is just around the corner. Prepare to vote with the latest updates from our election newsletter.

Two years ago, Chiefer Danks of Rosedale, who works in agriculture, believed the former president would stabilize the economy and make life more affordable again as it was under his first administration. But more than a year into the second Trump administration, Danks isn’t pleased with how things have changed. 

Like Danks, many California Latinos feel betrayed by the president’s campaign promises to promptly lower costs and keep the U.S. out of foreign military entanglements — both of which ring hollow as gasoline and grocery prices surge due primarily to Trump’s unpopular war in Iran.

They’re also frightened and outraged that Trump’s second administration has targeted Latino residents — both those here illegally and legally, even U.S. citizens — with violent immigration raids and deportations, separating families in the process. 

“I thought he was going to make America great again,” said Danks, 31, as he stood waiting for his wife in El Mercado Latino, a hub for Latino-owned family businesses in the heavily Hispanic neighborhood of East Bakersfield. “He didn’t follow through on his words.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Public opinion polls and off-year elections have pointed to Latinos reversing their historic 2024 rightward shift toward Trump. And according to a new CalMatters review of 2025 election data, that trend also applies to last year’s special election on redistricting — which Democrats successfully framed as a referendum on Trump.

The analysis of voting results from 57 of California’s 58 counties found that Proposition 50, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to gerrymander the state’s congressional districts in Democrats’ favor, vastly outperformed Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign in precincts where the majority of voters are nonwhite. 

The trend was most striking in precincts where the majority of ballots were cast by Latino voters. “Yes” on Prop. 50 gained about 30 percentage points compared to Harris’s performance against Trump a year earlier, according to CalMatters’ analysis. 

CalMatters’ findings provide some of the clearest quantitative evidence yet that the Latino rightward shift toward Trump in 2024 was more a blip than a permanent realignment, a nationwide trend that has so far been captured by state and national polling, focus groups and anecdotal evidence. 

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from freezing California child care funds

A federal judge in New York temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s freeze of $10 billion in child welfare funds Friday following a lawsuit filed by California and four other Democrat-led states.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review 

The order puts a 14-day stay on the funding freeze, which the Trump administration enacted earlier this week targeting five blue states:  California, New York — where the lawsuit was filed — Illinois, Minnesota and Colorado. Letters from the Trump administration informed each state there were “serious concerns about widespread fraud and misuse of taxpayer dollars.”

“Again and again, President Trump has shown a willingness to throw vulnerable children, seniors, and families under the bus if he thinks it will advance his vendetta against Democratic-led states,” Bonta said in a statement Friday. “Cutting funding for childcare and other family assistance is cruel, reckless, and most importantly, illegal. Today’s emergency order is an important victory for the millions of hardworking California families who benefit from these programs — but we won’t stop fighting until we block this unlawful funding freeze permanently.”

The order, signed by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, directs the federal government to “immediately remove any restrictions” of the states’ ability to draw down funds under the Child Care Development Fund and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families and Social Services block grant programs.

In their lawsuit, the five states argue that freezing the funds — which provide services and cash assistance that allow families to access food, safe housing and child care — is illegal and would put vulnerable families at risk. 

“Their transparent motivation is to punish ‘Democrat-led’ states who are disfavored by the Administration,” the lawsuit says. 

The child care funding revocation is the latest attempt by the Trump administration to punish California for policies it disapproves of. The White House has already attempted to claw back funding over the state’s sanctuary policies, state law that allows transgender athletes to compete on women’s sports teams and more. Earlier this week, the federal government said it would withhold $160 million in transportation funding over an ongoing dispute with the California Department of Motor Vehicles regarding how noncitizen drivers with federal working permits are issued commercial trucking licenses. 

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle