Trump chips away at CARB, yet again

With help from Marisa Guerra Echeverria

PARTS PROBLEM: The Trump administration has left no stone unturned in its push to dismantle California air regulators’ influence.

The most recent hit came last week, when the Environmental Protection Agency announced that it would end a longstanding practice of allowing California to act as the de facto national regulator of aftermarket car parts.

This matters because the state has long policed aftermarket parts that can inadvertently or intentionally affect emissions controls on cars and trucks, causing them to spew more pollution into the air that harms public health.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The California Air Resources Board, the powerful regulatory agency that wields that power, is a frequent target of President Donald Trump. He’s often framed it as fueling an affordability crisis through its climate and air pollution policies.

“Unsurprisingly, the CARB process is faulty and backlogged, and its certification takes 12 to 18 months to complete,” the EPA said in its announcement about the changes. “These delays have left small businesses, the majority of aftermarket suppliers, sidelined while Chinese counterfeits flooded the market.”

The Trump administration is instead handing that authority to an industry trade association, the Specialty Equipment Market Association, that has, at times, butted heads with California state officials.

Some environmental groups are skeptical of the move — especially since the industry association was among the most vocal supporters of Republicans’ maneuver to revoke California’s EV standards last year.

“Outsourcing certification to the industry is a textbook example of putting the fox in charge of the chicken coop,” said Bill Magavern, policy director at the Coalition for Clean Air. “It reeks of conflict of interest to have the industry in charge of certifying the aftermarket parts, and it opens the door to tampering.”

The federal government has long deferred to California, which has by far the largest team of vehicle emissions-testing staff in the nation, to certify that aftermarket parts comply with the Clean Air Act. Now, parts makers can go to SEMA, which represents over 7,000 companies across the aftermarket parts industry, to receive approval.

While the change will apply to the other 49 states — CARB still has the power to test and certify aftermarket parts sold in California — the move fits into the larger pattern of the administration and congressional Republicans blunting the Golden State’s historically significant power to influence car markets nationwide.

CARB officials have countered the basis of the EPA’s latest broadside, arguing that the state’s program for certifying vehicle modifications does not apply nationwide or include replacement parts that meet original manufacturer specifications.

CARB spokesperson John Swanton said in a statement that EPA’s announcement “falsely claims California’s certification process [in place for more than 50 years] takes 12 to 18 months to complete. The fact is it takes an average of 90 days.”

Karen Bailey-Chapman, SEMA’s senior vice president for public and government affairs, said the group “agrees to disagree” with CARB’s assessment of the certification timelines, arguing that its internal data shows a process that takes an average of 12 months, if not longer. She said that the delay creates confusion and hurts small manufacturers competing with unscrupulous businesses that sell copycat parts and avoid the testing hurdles.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

President Trump Celebrates America’s 250th While Gavin Newsom Whines

No one will remember Gavin Newsom in 100 years, but Donald Trump will go down in history as one of America’s greatest presidents

While you were celebrating the Fourth of July semiquincentennial celebrations, America’s 250th birthday, grilling hot dogs and hamburgers, and smoking try-tip, while the kids and grandkids were splashing in swimming pools, and while families joined in parades, California Governor Gavin Newsom could only think of one thing – himself.

As President Donald J. Trump was putting on the greatest fireworks show in American history, and thousands of Americans visited the Great American State Fair in Washington D.C., California’s whiny governor posted a video carping about Donald Trump, and projecting his own corruption onto America’s President.

“250 years ago, our founders gave voice to one of the most radical sentences ever written: ‘We the People.’ Today, that idea is under attack,” Gavin Newsom said. 

Tell that to the thousands upon thousands of Americans at the Great American State Fair, and the thousands who stayed for the 850,000-shell fireworks show.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Newsom claimed that Trump:

  • He’s embraced gerrymandering to entrench minority rule
  • Donald Trump and his allies are pushing voter suppression laws across the country
  • Donald Trump and his allies are trying to end birthright citizenship
  • Donald Trump is threatening to use the military and law enforcement against his political opponents

Notably, Newsom just redistricted California to gerrymander and eliminate the votes of specific Republican-leaning areas, something the Founding Fathers fought against.

I don’t think the Founding Fathers would care much for Gavin.

What actually was under attack was California – “Fourth of July descended into mayhem across Southern California as unruly crowds overwhelmed packed-out fireworks displays, looted stores, ignited fires and saw cops charge on horseback,” the California Post reported. “Officers were swarmed by hundreds of people who hurled bottles and other debris at them before the crowd turned on one another and began fighting.”

Compare Newsom’s ridiculous speech, tearing down what he himself is incapable of building, to President Trump’s at the Salute to America Celebration July 4, 2026, praising America, our flags that flew at Saratoga and Yorktown, the founders, American explorers, our military Medal of Honor recipients, and our armed forces: Army, Marine Corps, Navy, Air Force.

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

Trump administration to probe California’s powerful coastal watchdog

The Trump administration is planning a review of the powerful California Coastal Commission and other state regulatory agencies that deal with the state’s shoreline, saying they’re likely out of compliance with the nation’s coastal management laws — an assertion critics say is merely a pretense to weaken their authority.

U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick directed the review in a recent letter to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. He alleged that California regulators were making decisions about development and other activities without giving due consideration to military plans and possibly many other federal interests, including offshore oil and gas drilling.

By initiating an assessment of California’s federally approved coastal management program, and the agencies that execute it, the administration is opening the door to changing how much say the state has over federal and federally licensed projects — from dredging harbors to developing wind farms in the ocean to building undersea pipelines.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Coastal management programs, which ensure states have a voice in federal planning, are periodically reviewed and lightly modified under the federal Coastal Zone Management Act of 1972. But because a review of California’s program had been nearly completed under the Biden administration, the Commerce Department’s call for a new review, on top of its stark criticism of the state, have some in California worried the agency is looking to make major changes.

“This is not a routine review,” said Richard Charter, a longtime oceans advocate and director of the Local Government Outer Continental Shelf Coordination Program, a coalition of coastal cities and counties opposed to oil development. “This is a targeted effort to remove the defenses of the California coast.”

The review comes as the Trump administration has tangled with California over a number of issues, not the least of which is the expansion of offshore oil and gas drilling. Many in the state oppose new fossil fuel development along the coastline, fearing harm to the ocean and an acceleration of climate change.

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

Newsom vows 100 percent tax on DOJ ‘Anti-Weaponization Fund’ payouts

His pledge mirrors Democratic efforts in New York and New Jersey.

SACRAMENTO, California — Gavin Newsom vowed Wednesday to tax any payouts that California residents receive from a $1.776 billion “anti-weaponization” fund that Donald Trump secured in a settlement with his own Justice Department, as Democratic lawmakers in states across the country ramp up efforts to counter the president on the measure.

“Anyone from California that receives any of those funds, we want to tax 100 percent of those proceeds,” the California governor told reporters during a press conference in his office, calling the settlement a “slush fund.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Newsom’s pledge mirrors legislation unveiled earlier this week in New York by Democrat Alex Bores, a state assemblymember and House candidate, that would assess a 100 percent tax against payouts from the fund. Trump announced the fund last week as part of his $10 billion settlement with the DOJ in his lawsuit against the IRS, and Democratic efforts to undercut any payouts are picking up across the country.

Democratic state lawmakers in New York are pushing for a vote by next week to fully tax payouts from the fund. Queens state Sen. Mike Gianaris in an interview said his measure was in the process of being introduced in the Democratic-dominated Legislature.

“There’s widespread, bipartisan agreement that this is baldfaced corruption at its worst and if we have the ability in New York to combat it by ensuring that none of this money benefits anyone in our state’s borders, I’d expect there’d be widespread support for that idea,” he said.

Bores in a text message Wednesday night said he was working on getting his bill put up for a vote next week as well. Time is running short in Albany, where lawmakers are scheduled to end their legislative session late next week and will have a heavy docket of bills to approve.

In New Jersey, a Democratic state lawmaker said he was already working to draft a bill to set up a 100 percent tax on recipients of the funds.

“I think it’s brilliant — because the slush fund is completely corrupt and utterly appalling,” state Sen. Andrew Zwicker, a member of his chamber’s Budget committee, told POLITICO in an interview. “I think it’s a brilliant counter move to Trump’s corruption.”

Democrats and even some Republicans have blasted the fund. Trump didn’t consult lawmakers before announcing it and refused to rule out payouts to people who were convicted of crimes in connection with the Jan. 6, 2021 riot at the Capitol. Congressional Democrats have proposed their own legislation aimed at countering the fund.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

Latinos in California are mad at Trump. Their votes for Democrats’ gerrymandering show it

California’s primary election is just around the corner. Prepare to vote with the latest updates from our election newsletter.

Two years ago, Chiefer Danks of Rosedale, who works in agriculture, believed the former president would stabilize the economy and make life more affordable again as it was under his first administration. But more than a year into the second Trump administration, Danks isn’t pleased with how things have changed. 

Like Danks, many California Latinos feel betrayed by the president’s campaign promises to promptly lower costs and keep the U.S. out of foreign military entanglements — both of which ring hollow as gasoline and grocery prices surge due primarily to Trump’s unpopular war in Iran.

They’re also frightened and outraged that Trump’s second administration has targeted Latino residents — both those here illegally and legally, even U.S. citizens — with violent immigration raids and deportations, separating families in the process. 

“I thought he was going to make America great again,” said Danks, 31, as he stood waiting for his wife in El Mercado Latino, a hub for Latino-owned family businesses in the heavily Hispanic neighborhood of East Bakersfield. “He didn’t follow through on his words.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Public opinion polls and off-year elections have pointed to Latinos reversing their historic 2024 rightward shift toward Trump. And according to a new CalMatters review of 2025 election data, that trend also applies to last year’s special election on redistricting — which Democrats successfully framed as a referendum on Trump.

The analysis of voting results from 57 of California’s 58 counties found that Proposition 50, Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to gerrymander the state’s congressional districts in Democrats’ favor, vastly outperformed Kamala Harris’s 2024 presidential campaign in precincts where the majority of voters are nonwhite. 

The trend was most striking in precincts where the majority of ballots were cast by Latino voters. “Yes” on Prop. 50 gained about 30 percentage points compared to Harris’s performance against Trump a year earlier, according to CalMatters’ analysis. 

CalMatters’ findings provide some of the clearest quantitative evidence yet that the Latino rightward shift toward Trump in 2024 was more a blip than a permanent realignment, a nationwide trend that has so far been captured by state and national polling, focus groups and anecdotal evidence. 

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

Federal judge blocks Trump administration from freezing California child care funds

A federal judge in New York temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s freeze of $10 billion in child welfare funds Friday following a lawsuit filed by California and four other Democrat-led states.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review 

The order puts a 14-day stay on the funding freeze, which the Trump administration enacted earlier this week targeting five blue states:  California, New York — where the lawsuit was filed — Illinois, Minnesota and Colorado. Letters from the Trump administration informed each state there were “serious concerns about widespread fraud and misuse of taxpayer dollars.”

“Again and again, President Trump has shown a willingness to throw vulnerable children, seniors, and families under the bus if he thinks it will advance his vendetta against Democratic-led states,” Bonta said in a statement Friday. “Cutting funding for childcare and other family assistance is cruel, reckless, and most importantly, illegal. Today’s emergency order is an important victory for the millions of hardworking California families who benefit from these programs — but we won’t stop fighting until we block this unlawful funding freeze permanently.”

The order, signed by U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian, directs the federal government to “immediately remove any restrictions” of the states’ ability to draw down funds under the Child Care Development Fund and Temporary Assistance to Needy Families and Social Services block grant programs.

In their lawsuit, the five states argue that freezing the funds — which provide services and cash assistance that allow families to access food, safe housing and child care — is illegal and would put vulnerable families at risk. 

“Their transparent motivation is to punish ‘Democrat-led’ states who are disfavored by the Administration,” the lawsuit says. 

The child care funding revocation is the latest attempt by the Trump administration to punish California for policies it disapproves of. The White House has already attempted to claw back funding over the state’s sanctuary policies, state law that allows transgender athletes to compete on women’s sports teams and more. Earlier this week, the federal government said it would withhold $160 million in transportation funding over an ongoing dispute with the California Department of Motor Vehicles regarding how noncitizen drivers with federal working permits are issued commercial trucking licenses. 

Click here to read the full article in the SF Chronicle

Trump claims crime is rampant in California. Newsom counters with stats showing historic lows

  • Killings in Los Angeles plummeted in 2025, mirroring trends statewide.
  • Gov. Gavin Newsom touted the latest numbers in his speech Thursday, pushing back against President Trump’s insistence that crime in the state is out of control.
  • Newsom spoke directly to Trump and said the image of widespread lawlessness that influenced voters in the 2024 election is now outdated: ‘It’s time to update your talking points.’

Gov. Gavin Newsom used his final State of the State address to underscore California’s jaw-dropping crime figures — stats that he said refute the president’s claims about widespread murder and mayhem.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

To put into perspective some of the numbers cited by the governor on Thursday:

The last time homicides were this low in Oakland, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr. was visiting Joan Baez at Santa Rita Jail to commend her on her recent arrest in protest of the Vietnam draft.

Killings haven’t been so rare in San Francisco since superstar Marilyn Monroe wed baseball legend Joe DiMaggio at City Hall.

And violent deaths in the city of Los Angeles fell to rates not seen since the Beatles played Dodgers Stadium, their penultimate public show.

“We have seen double-digit decreases in crime overall in the state of California,” Newsom said. “We’ve got more work to do, but to those with that California derangement syndrome, I’ll repeat — it’s time to update your talking points.”

The governor’s remarks follow reporting by The Times that showed L.A.’s homicide rate is nearing a record low, mirroring trends in other cities nationwide.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Gov Newsom ‘Bends the Knee’ to Trump After Maligning President at NYT Event

Newsom has all but abandoned the Palisades fire victims; is now asking for a $34 billion federal bailout

California Governor Gavin Newsom disparaged President Donald Trump at the New York Times Dealbook Summit in New York City this week, while turning around and sending a letter to Congressional leaders asking for a $34 billion bailout for the Los Angeles County Palisades fires.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The NYTimes posted:

Newsom Warns That Trump Is ‘Trying to Wreck This Country’

The California governor weighed in on the 2028 presidential election, and called out executives for “bending the knee” to President Trump.

“I think he recognizes time of life is catching up with him, even though he can’t remember exactly why he went in for an M.R.I.,” Mr. Newsom said.

It was one of several combative comments that Mr. Newsom made during the 43-minute conversation. He said he hopes his social media strategy mocking Mr. Trump’s bombast will force the public to acknowledge how the president has ripped up norms of civility.

“There’s nothing normal about this,” Mr. Newsom said. “He’s a man child.”

Having previously assailed Trump’s retreat from Climate Action, the NYT posted on Facebook, Newsom saying about President Trump: “What an abomination. What an embarrassment. What a fraud.”

At the New York Times event, Newsom Says Trump’s Attacks Are “Not Normal Behavior.”

Newsom always plays to whatever audience he is addressing, so his comments aren’t unexpected or alarming, but they are bombastic and uncivilized.

https://platform.twitter.com/embed/Tweet.html?dnt=true&embedId=twitter-widget-0&features=eyJ0ZndfdGltZWxpbmVfbGlzdCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOltdLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X2ZvbGxvd2VyX2NvdW50X3N1bnNldCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOnRydWUsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdHdlZXRfZWRpdF9iYWNrZW5kIjp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6Im9uIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH0sInRmd19yZWZzcmNfc2Vzc2lvbiI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfZm9zbnJfc29mdF9pbnRlcnZlbnRpb25zX2VuYWJsZWQiOnsiYnVja2V0Ijoib24iLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X21peGVkX21lZGlhXzE1ODk3Ijp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6InRyZWF0bWVudCIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfZXhwZXJpbWVudHNfY29va2llX2V4cGlyYXRpb24iOnsiYnVja2V0IjoxMjA5NjAwLCJ2ZXJzaW9uIjpudWxsfSwidGZ3X3Nob3dfYmlyZHdhdGNoX3Bpdm90c19lbmFibGVkIjp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6Im9uIiwidmVyc2lvbiI6bnVsbH0sInRmd19kdXBsaWNhdGVfc2NyaWJlc190b19zZXR0aW5ncyI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdXNlX3Byb2ZpbGVfaW1hZ2Vfc2hhcGVfZW5hYmxlZCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdmlkZW9faGxzX2R5bmFtaWNfbWFuaWZlc3RzXzE1MDgyIjp7ImJ1Y2tldCI6InRydWVfYml0cmF0ZSIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfbGVnYWN5X3RpbWVsaW5lX3N1bnNldCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOnRydWUsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9LCJ0ZndfdHdlZXRfZWRpdF9mcm9udGVuZCI6eyJidWNrZXQiOiJvbiIsInZlcnNpb24iOm51bGx9fQ%3D%3D&frame=false&hideCard=false&hideThread=false&id=1996341880703868935&lang=en&origin=https%3A%2F%2Fcaliforniaglobe.com%2Ffl%2Fgov-newsom-bends-the-knee-to-trump-after-maligning-president-at-nyt-event%2F&sessionId=4a3672aab33102bddf3e4e97e36daa05b45898ae&theme=light&widgetsVersion=2615f7e52b7e0%3A1702314776716&width=550px

Yet,  the California governor needs federal funding to bail him out of a really big political problem.

It is Governor Newsom who is “bending the knee” to President Trump. Newsom now claims he is “taking his advocacy for LA fire recovery to Washington to again call on the Trump administration to provide a proposal to Congress to immediately assist LA fire survivors in rebuilding their communities.”

Newsom has made President Trump the central focus of his Presidential campaign, disparaging and slandering the President at every turn. But the governor also wants the federal government to pay for the Palisades fire victims, 11 months after the fires. Newsom admits he hasn’t done anything in 11 months to get federal aid, and has all but abandoned the Palisades fire victims through inaction, causing the re-victimization of the fire survivors.

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

California Democrats made Prop. 50 about Trump. Polls show it worked

Welcome to CalMatters, the only nonprofit newsroom devoted solely to covering issues that affect all Californians. Sign up for WhatMatters to receive the latest news and commentary on the most important issues in the Golden State.

A day before voting ends for Proposition 50, California voters appear poised to approve Gov. Gavin Newsom’s plan to gerrymander the state’s congressional districts in Democrats’ favor. 

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Recent opinion polls show strong support for the Yes side. Newsom’s campaign is flooding the airwaves with star-studded advertisements and drowning out its opponents’ faint final pitch to voters. And the governor has even asked supporters to back off on donations, as the influx of contributions was crashing the state’s campaign finance website.

“You can stop donating now. Thank you,” proclaimed the subject line of an email from Newsom’s campaign to supporters last week. “We have hit our budget goals and raised what we need in order to pass Proposition 50.”

If approved, the measure would temporarily suspend California’s current congressional maps, which were drawn by an independent citizens commission, and replace them through 2030 with districts drawn by Democratic insiders. 

Newsom and his allies say California must counter mid-decade gerrymandering efforts in Republican controlled states such as Texas, Missouri and North Carolina in order to give Democrats a fair chance to win back the U.S. House of Representatives in next year’s midterm elections. Mail-in voting has already been underway for more than four weeks. 

Some of Prop. 50’s major opponents are also privately resigned to the reality that the measure will pass, despite putting on a defiant game face. 

“I don’t run away from a fight,” insisted Rep. Doug LaMalfa, a Republican from Oroville whose district would be dramatically altered under the new maps, at a recent No on 50 press conference.

But just moments before, LaMalfa also conceded that the opposition was “outnumbered two-to-one” when it came to spending in the crucial final days of the campaign.

“We are outgunned on the fundraising side,” he said.

A spokesperson for the No on 50 campaign did not respond to an emailed request for comment.

Two of California’s most reputable nonpartisan pollsters last week found that a solid majority of likely voters are supporting, or have already voted for, Prop. 50. 

The Public Policy Institute of California found that 56% of likely voters said they would support the measure, compared to just 43% who said they would oppose it. The survey also found that nearly seven in 10 Californians, regardless of party, said the outcome of the special election was “very important” to them. That’s a record high level of interest in a ballot measure.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

What does having 11 tattoos convey to ICE?

Could it include “reasonable suspicion?”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The recent Supreme Court decision, written by Justice Kavanaugh, sending back a lower Federal court decision that had enjoined ICE agents in Los Angeles from simply asking a person under “reasonable suspicion” if they are a citizen, has caused a lot of grief on the Left. The Left thinks just asking the question violates the Constitution. Pompous Illinois Governor Pritzker has gone bonkers on the “constitutional crisis” of just asking the question. But when the question is asked of a suspected illegal migrant, such as a person whom ICE may be informed is an illegal migrant, or who is acting in public in a manner that common sense supports an illegal migrant might act, and then after the question is asked, they attempt to evade and run away from the questioner, the ensuing pursuit (after the Supreme Court decision) is now pretty clearly going to be a legal one, as is the arrest, if the person is indeed an illegal migrant, when the dust settles on the case law.

Kavanaugh explained that “reasonable suspicion” is not “probable cause.” You thus can’t just constitutionally arrest anyone on the street by the way they look or act, common sense notwithstanding, without “probable cause.” Doing that would indeed, 100%, violate the Constitution. But illegal migration is a big problem for America, and especially Los Angeles, where 2 million of 20 million residents are illegals, according to court-recognized statistics. The migrant population has indeed strained the social welfare system, clogging space in hospital emergency rooms and taxpayer-funded maternity wards, and while advocacy groups argue otherwise, there is no doubt that in light of income disparities between the ranks of citizens compared to the cohort of noncitizens, that the high level of illegal immigrants present in the Los Angeles area also contribute to a higher crime rate than if Federal law was actually being enforced.

Click here to subscribe to James V. Lacy’s Substack