Prop. 1 Roots Go Back to Water Bonds that Built California

You might say that Proposition 1, the water bond, carries the DNA of bonds that promoted a growing and prosperous California. Water bonds helped build the Los Angeles Aqueduct in the early 1900s to make possible the growth of one of the world’s great cities. Another bond helped build the State Water Project half-a-century later, which, among other things, helped spur the state’s agricultural abundance. With the state facing a drought of staggering proportions, Proposition 1 would continue California’s long history of providing and caring for precious water resources.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

The seven-plus billion dollar bond contains money for protecting watersheds, cleaning contaminated groundwater, and water recycling among other projects. But unlike water bonds passed in the last decade, the heritage that the Prop 1 bond shares with the bonds that helped build California is the $2.7 billion set aside for water storage projects, dams and reservoirs, almost 40-percent of the total bond.

As Governor Pat Brown’s biographer, Ethan Rarick, points out his book, California Rising, the Life and Times of Pat Brown, the physical aspects of the Central Valley and Southern California are good for neither plants nor people. Rarick dedicates a chapter of the book to the history of the State Water Project and the campaign for the bond that narrowly passed. Pat Brown set out to, in his own words, “correct an accident of people and geography.”

Pat Brown’s State Water Project stored water behind dams and moved the water to where it was needed. The storage aspect of Proposition1 is essential for building up the water supply as the drought deepens.

The dams that stored the water to help create the California we know today were considered so important that President John F. Kennedy came out to California to help dedicate not one but two dams.

President Kennedy dedicated the San Luis Dam that created the San Luis Reservoir in August of 1962. He was back a year later to dedicate the Whiskeytown Dam six miles west of Redding before a crowd of 10,000 people. Fox and Hounds contributor Joe Mathews wrote a history of Kennedy’s visit to the Whiskeytown Dam on the Zocalo Public Square website last year, which you can read here.

Kennedy talked about conservation during his Whiskeytown Reservoir speech. But he also said the dam would allow water to be used to “irrigate crops on the fertile plains of the Sacramento Valley and supply water also for municipal and industrial use to the cities to the south.”

In environmentally conscience California, dam building has been controversial. It was in the 1960s and opposition has certainly grown over time. Interestingly, the State Water Project was built with revenue from both the bond passed by the voters and from state money earned from offshore oil wells. Can you imagine such a proposal being pushed today? Certainly, it would meet loud opposition.

Still, voters and politicians recognize the need to have a safe and adequate water supply. Pat Brown’s son, Governor Jerry Brown, recognized the need and included storage in the water measure he negotiated.

That day in Whiskeytown, President Kennedy, speaking of the dams and reservoirs, acknowledged “the wise decisions that were made by those who came before, and the wise decisions that you are making now.” We will see if the voters of today continue to make wise decisions about water.

This piece was originally published on Fox and Hounds Daily.


  1. The Scotsman says

    The Los Angeles water bond was a gross boo-boo. It took nearly 100 years to start correcting this near disaster. As time past, SoCal
    demanded MORE water. This started the NorCal Water SELL OUT.
    water needs were outrunning their storage. O.K. NorCal has lots of water, so lets divert a few BILLION Gallons a day to us in SoCal.
    That happened. As the years went by, SoCal’s population kept on
    growing at a rapid rate! The DEMAND for MORE NorCal’s water
    increased also at a rapid rate. Now it’s Drought Time again. Central
    Cal’s agriculture water has been shut off by both the Feds and the
    State. Our NorCal water storage supply is disappearing and our
    spooked Guv is planning to spend Billions of Bucks to send MORE water to SoCal. There apparently are NO PLANS to put any water
    in the San Joaquin agriculture system. NO WATER, NO CROPS
    water in the Million of swimming pools go bad. We can’t allow
    our Thousands of Golf Courses turn brown. We can’t forget
    the poor Fishies that want all the fresh water they can get.
    Another large water need is Fire Fighting. I have heard some
    talk about rationing the water in Fire Hydrant systems because
    of the drought!
    WAKE UP CALIFORNIA, Smell The Bacon and STOP OUR

  2. I will still vote no on ANY Proposition that further indebts the state of Taxifornia for the FAILURE of the Govenor and Legislature to properly shepherd over our tax dollars. Enough, is enough, is enough.
    While ‘Moon Beam’ continues to push for his ‘Legacy Choo Choo’, which nobody seems to want, I personally feel his, as well as the legislatures immediate priority should be water, but it’s not.
    The primary interest and concern of the Democrats in charge of, and running this state are more concerned about massive social programs and protecting illegal aliens than any water issues that the state has.
    They were elected to serve the taxpayers of California, not act as as social/welfare service for the illegals that flock to this state.
    If enough people start opposing all of these propositions that cover the politician’s refusal to perform the duties that they were elected to do, perhaps they’ll vote someone into office who will do the job.
    In the mean time, I will continue to vote NO on all bond issues that increase taxes or further indebt the state.

Speak Your Mind