Report: Ex-Cal State Chancellor Mishandled Misconduct Claims

The former chancellor of California State University, the nation’s largest public university system, mishandled sexual misconduct allegations while he headed the Fresno campus, according to a report released Thursday.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Joseph I. Castro failed to deal properly with complaints against Frank Lamas while Castro was Fresno State’s president because he had a “blind spot” for his friend, according to the results of a months-long investigation commissioned by the CSU system.

Lamas, the campus vice president of student affairs from mid-July 2014 until his retirement in 2020, was recruited by Castro, according to the report.

During his tenure, the campus received at least nine complaints that Lamas improperly touched women, made sexist comments and harassed or retaliated against workers, the report said. 

Most of the complaints were informal or anonymous. The report said some involved behavior that wasn’t specifically barred by the system’s policy prohibiting sexual or other harassment of employees.

No action was taken against Lamas until a formal complaint was filed in 2019, when he was barred from campus and later found to have violated a CSU harassment policy.

While Castro and others repeatedly talked to Lamas, counseling him not to engage in such conduct, the president “consistently did not take any significant action against but instead supported Lamas throughout his employment even in the face of multiple allegations, growing evidence, and ultimately, confirmed findings of Lamas’ alleged misconduct,” the report said.

From 2016 through 2019, Castro made eight recommendations of Lamas for presidential positions both inside and outside the CSU system without making reference to the misconduct complaints, the report said.

Lamas, who has denied the misconduct allegations, retired in 2020 as part of a settlement agreement granting him a $260,000 payment equivalent to a year’s salary and barring him from CSU work. The settlement, which was approved by the CSU chancellor at the time, didn’t violate system policies and there were legitimate reasons for supporting it, including the risk and cost if Lamas sued, the report said.

However, Castro acted inappropriately when he agreed to write Lamas a “very positive” letter of recommendation to help find work elsewhere, the report said.

Castro disputed the report’s findings in a statement issued Thursday and cited by the Los Angeles Times, saying he had made decisions based on the advice of CSU’s lawyer and previous chancellor.

“I have been a steadfast champion for gender equity throughout my career and will redouble my efforts in this important area going forward,” Castro said.

The 10-page report was conducted by a law firm that also investigated Lamas.

Click here to read the full article at AP News


  1. Identity politics folks.

    In this case it was – I am a brown skin, black hair, and speak Spanish…..and the old boy system promoted by Democrats would not (not could not) fire him.

    Understand the “old boy system” if it had been a person of the white skin persuasion would have resulted in firings, forced resignations, and / or transferring of personnel.

    If it had been a (sshhhhh) black person there would have been champagne corks popping and high 5’s around. Defending the faithful. (think that is prejudicial? I saw it)

    The college is no longer a seat of pride and excellence.

Speak Your Mind