To Prioritize Infrastructure, Consider All State Spending

Infrastructure constructionNotable in the reaction to Governor Jerry Brown’s Friday press conference outlining money for dam and water infrastructure, while declaring the need for California to tackle all its infrastructure backlog, was the response from one of the leaders of the fight for improved infrastructure. California Business Roundtable president Rob Lapsley issued a release echoing the governor’s call on structural improvements and cost, but focused on “the real issue at hand” — state spending.

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

Everyone agrees that California infrastructure needs repair and the money to make those repairs happen. The debate is over how to fund repairs and build projects.

Negotiations on reaching a deal on funding infrastructure improvements have been going on for some time and business community leaders have been deeply involved. Meanwhile, the more open debate on infrastructure funding continues with the capitol generally separated into two camps, one headed by Democrats who want tax increases and the other by Republicans who want to redirect current funding for infrastructure purposes.

However, Lapsley broadened the debate by discussing overall state spending as part of a larger fix for funding the state’s priorities.

Laplsey wrote, “California is one of the highest taxed states in the nation and, even after passing even more taxes through Prop 55 last November, the state is effectively out of money. We have record general fund and special fund revenues, but it has been decades since infrastructure investment was a priority in our state budget.”

While pledging to support the Brown Administration’s efforts to secure infrastructure dollars from Washington, Lapsley wrote, “we need an honest rational discussion in the Legislature on how to pay for state salaries, pensions and pension debt, health care, dams, flood control, roads, transit, schools and other infrastructure needs while expediting solutions through real regulatory reform that apply to all economically important projects, and not just the politically favored few.”

California’s infrastructure, as California Chamber of Commerce president Allan Zaremberg noted in a release tied to the governor’s press conference, “is a key component of maintaining and improving California’s economy for everyone’s benefit.”

Simply put, infrastructure improvements must be a priority of state spending because the improvements benefit all Californians economically and on safety issues.

Lapsley rightly points out infrastructure has been a low priority for California lawmakers for some time. That has to change.

The change will have to include discussing spending on all other programs in this high tax state. We must consider the spending on pensions and salaries and debt and all the issues Lapsley raised if we are to focus attention on the paramount needs of infrastructure. In the end, improving infrastructure would advance the economy, which in turn would benefit all the other areas funded by the state budget.

Editor of Fox & Hounds and President of the Small Business Action Committee.

This piece was originally published by Fox and Hounds Daily


  1. You can start by taking all money raised by the gas tax and using it for nothing but roads and bridge. The next thing to do is take caltrans out of the picture and hire companies that can do the job better on time and at a lower cost

    • Absolutely — what has happened to all of the gasoline taxes for road maintenance — I feel that Gov Brow has spent it on the train to nowhere so that he ha a legacy–ha ha that is quite a legacy while CA falls apart. So sad for my State

  2. Karl Studinger says

    I think that the governor finds it too easy to spend other people’s money. The train to nowhere, and the tunnel costs are out of control. We pay almost .40 per gallon of gas. Why not take the train money, tunnel money, and and gas tax money, and build real infrastructure.

  3. Our political leaders, particularly in the legislature, exist on a cloud floating over La La Land; they win no Oscars for their performance.

  4. Interesting isn’t it. The Democrats and Socialists are willing to spend on social programs while the basics of why government is formed crumble.

    People came together for safety, health, and then basics known as roads, water, sewer etc.

    The taxpayers gave the Democrats Billions and what happened? Crumbling infrastructure. Amazing isn’t!

    Still voting Democrat? Stupid is as Stupid does.

    • Christian says

      Meanwhile, Brown asks the Feds for more money to fix Oroville dam even though we have nearly $7 Billion in water bonds approved in 2014.

  5. Instead of spending money on illegals, the train and tunnel to nowhere, high pension funds, high salaries for government workers and high salaries for the legislature try spending on infrastructure.

  6. Gary Von Neida says

    The Liberal “nut jobs” like governor “moon beam” want money for gay toilets, eventually One for Women, One for Men, One for Girls, One for Boys, One for “in transition to Male” and One for Trans. to Female. Then there is the need for “rent, food, education and health care” for all the SANCTUARY CITIES. Get smart and elect a Republican Administration, after PURGING THE VOTER ROLLS allowing only real human citizens the VOTE.

  7. First give up the idea of the railroad to no where and the tunnels for water.
    Fix roads and dams.
    Allow the cemtral water to have axcess to water and grow food.
    Fish are important but the people are the most important.

Speak Your Mind