As reported by the Sacramento Bee:
Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!Democrats Loretta Sanchez and Kamala Harris, as they’ve campaigned for U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer’s seat, have time and again advocated for a federal immigration overhaul – with Sanchez calling it a “moral imperative,” and Harris arguing it’s the civil rights issue of the current age.
There was little distance between the rivals’ broader immigration policy pronouncements at Monday night’s televised debate in Stockton, but there were clear differences on the finer points.
Sanchez, a congresswoman for nearly two decades, opted for the GOP-favorite phrase “family values” to assert families with mixed immigration status should not be separated. She blames Republicans for the morass.
Harris agreed that those in the shadows need a pathway to citizenship, yet she …
Their only disagreement is on the size of the “goody-bag” that should be given to the border-jumpers.
Do our legal immigration laws need to be gone over? Yes they do. Does the illegal side need change? NO it does not. All the illegal side need is to be enforced. When an Attorney General says that breaking a law is not a criminal act it is time for that attorney general to be fired.
Naw John. It is time for her to be imprisoned. She is strong-arming conservative groups to disclose conservative donors although not legally required, so the list can end up exposed to those in the public who would harass them (similar to the Prop.8 experience)
“There was little distance between the rivals’ broader immigration policy pronouncements at Monday night’s televised debate in Stockton, but there were clear differences on the finer points”
Its well past time to bury these all but ossified 1960/70s divisity politics and the gynosaurs who still shill them. All this crap truly ended with Big Daddy Jess Unruh and his protege, Willie Brown (the former Speaker and one-time mayor of Frisco. Even the less flashy Governor moonbeam knows better and tries to move with the times.