Gavin Newsom signs Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha into law as new California state holidays

California governor also signed laws providing protections for other religious holidays like Yom Kippur

California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed into law a bill that formally recognizes two Muslim holidays as state holidays on Sunday, making it the second state to formally recognize both holidays statewide.

California Assembly Bill 2017 officially added Eid al-Fitr and Eid al-Adha to the list of state holidays, which would permit public schools and colleges to close and allow state employees to be eligible to observe the holidays.

However, schools and businesses will not be required to close on these days, and courts will be required to stay open.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

This makes California the second state in the country, after Washington state, to pass statewide legislation recognizing the Muslim holidays.

Before signing AB 2017, Newsom had multiple bills on his desk that provided protections and exceptions for other religious observances, including Jewish holidays such as Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur.

For example, AB 395, which reached the governor days before AB 2017, would codify these Jewish holidays, among others, into state law and require state agencies and facilities like schools to “make every reasonable effort” to avoid scheduling significant functions for those days.

Another bill, AB 1763, would also guarantee students in K-12 be allowed excused absences for religious holidays.

Though these bills were introduced and presented to the governor before AB 2017, Newsom did not sign the additional bills into law until Wednesday, prior to the midnight deadline.

Republican opponents criticized Newsom for appearing to prioritize bills recognizing Muslim holidays over bills allowing for equal treatment for Jewish holidays.

Click here to read the full article at FoxNews

California’s electricity market’s big week

LET’S TRADE: California’s regional electricity market is about to get a whole lot bigger.

Oregon’s largest electricity supplier, Portland General Electric, will join the Extended Day-Ahead Market at midnight on Thursday — the first entry of a new power provider since the market launched in May.

And on Wednesday, energy leaders selected the first board of directors for a new independent nonprofit that’s slated to eventually oversee that market.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“Having those two things happen within the same week, it gives me goose bumps,” said Pam Sporborg, senior director of transmission and market for the Oregon utility.

Portland General’s entry into the market represents a major step forward for the yearslong effort to expand electricity trading across the western states.

A coalition of energy leaders, who united in 2023 to form the West-Wide Governance Pathways Initiative, have been pushing to increase the connections between power plants and electricity providers across western states. Their goal is to facilitate electricity trading across a region that’s bigger than the weather, so that regions experiencing mild conditions can send power to places where extreme heat or cold is straining the grid.

The California Independent System Operator, an organization which manages California’s grid, had already established a market that many western utilities participate in, but it only allowed for electricity trades looking ahead to the next five, 10 or 15 minutes.

EDAM, the new market, will allow trades a full day ahead, when far more electricity use is planned by power providers. California energy leaders say that will help make the western electricity grid more reliable, and save customers money by piping in electricity from regions where demand is low to areas that need more power on any given day.

The Oregon utility “expands the market’s geographic footprint,” said CAISO CEO Elliot Mainzer. “That broad footprint has been proven to be one of the most effective strategies for improving reliability and affordability.”

The power plants in Portland General’s territory complement those operating in the portfolio of California’s investor-owned utilities and the sprawling Northwestern utility Pacificorp, which are already participating in California’s new electricity market.

California is rich in solar electricity and Pacificorp brings wind to the table, while Portland General has a strong mix of hydroelectric, wind and natural gas generation, according to Sporborg.

Tapping a diverse range of renewable electricity will be essential to California meeting its renewable energy goals, since the state’s vast solar fleet goes idle when the sun goes down.

Seven more energy providers plan to join the EDAM over the next two years, which will extend the markets’ reach in Nevada, Montana and New Mexico. But one key utility is still riding the fence: the Bonneville Power Administration, a federal agency that distributes hydropower, and the largest electricity provider in the Northwest.

Last year, Bonneville announced its intention to join a competing electricity market, called Markets+, which Arkansas-based Southwest Power Pool is developing. Bonneville made its decision amid broader concern across the region that joining a regional electricity market operated by California risked governance that could unfairly favor California.

But later that year, California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed AB 825, a bill which allowed California to pass oversight of its electricity markets to an independent entity. In recent months, that new entity, a nonprofit called the Regional Organization for Western Energy, has taken shape. With its board of directors now in place, the group’s new leaders will begin meeting next month.

A new Bonneville administrator, Travis Kavulla, took the helm of the agency in June. Given the steps California has taken to pass oversight of the EDAM to an independent group, Kavulla wrote in a letter to the ROWE earlier this month that he has committed to reviewing which electricity market Bonneville should join “with fresh eyes.”

His letter detailed a slew of actions he hoped the ROWE would take to demonstrate its independence from California, including choosing a board chair who has “the gravitas and capability to lead decisively.”

Click here to read the full article in Politico

Advocates sue OpenAI over Hugging Face hack under California anti-hacking law

The lawsuit in San Francisco Superior Court is an early legal challenge to OpenAI over the autonomous hack of Hugging Face.

SAN FRANCISCO — A tech safety group is using a California anti-hacking law to sue OpenAI over the breach of artificial intelligence platform Hugging Face.

The complaint, filed Tuesday afternoon in San Francisco Superior Court, appears to be the first against OpenAI over the incident, which was disclosed in July as the earliest known example of artificial intelligence agents escaping human control to access the open internet, autonomously hack another company and scheme to cover their tracks.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The lawsuit comes from Legal Advocates for Safe Science and Technology, a nonprofit focused on making AI and other technological advancements safer for the world. The group said that, to its knowledge, it has not been the victim of an autonomous hack, but nonetheless is seeking an injunction to stop OpenAI’s technology from accessing third-party computer systems without authorization.

LASST argues that the group has the right to sue under the state’s unfair competition law. It’s claiming that OpenAI violated California’s Comprehensive Computer Data Access and Fraud Act, which prohibits intentionally accessing and obtaining information from computers without authorization.

“There’s nothing magic about it that means that this law applies to this instance and wouldn’t apply to the others,” Tyler Whitmer, LASST’s founder, told POLITICO of the Hugging Face hack. “I would say that includes incidents from other AI companies as well. I wouldn’t just limit that to OpenAI’s incidents.”

CEO Sam Altman on Friday called the Hugging Face incident the most severe one OpenAI has discovered. It involved a “swarm” of several hundred AI agents that exchanged over 70,000 secret messages about how to cheat their way through a common cybersecurity evaluation, according to an independent review.

“Hugging Face was a serious incident and we’ve taken a series of actions in response to it, but this lawsuit is completely without merit,” OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri said in a statement.

OpenAI has been conducting a broader review of its models’ activities following the Hugging Face incursion and, after the cases involving U.S. government websites became public, it announced a pause on training of the company’s latest AI models.

Whitmer said after Hugging Face indicated it wouldn’t be taking legal action and Nvidia announced an agreement to acquire the startup earlier this month, he decided it was important that “somebody do it.”

Click here to read the full article in Politico

Walters: Would closing California’s corporate tax loopholes actually generate new revenue?

California unions whose members depend on the state budget for their salaries celebrated last week when Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation aimed at plugging corporate tax loopholes.

“Giant, highly profitable, global corporations often pay less in California taxes than a social worker or a teacher,” Arnulfo De La Cruz, president of the Service Employees International Union, said in a statement. “That makes no sense at all, and we’re going to change that. Accountability for corporate tax credits is long overdue.

“Every year, caregivers, social workers, child care providers and state workers have to fight to justify funding for the vital work we do; yet, corporations walk away with billions in tax dollars and never have to justify a penny of it.”

Senate Bill 1349, sponsored by SEIU and other unions and carried by state Sen. Lena Gonzalez, a Long Beach Democrat, orders the Legislative Analyst’s Office to study major “tax expenditures,” the official name for tax laws that favor certain classes of taxpayers. The LAO would recommend changes or repeals of those that it deems to be cost-ineffective.

It’s the latest wrinkle in a yearslong political debate over whether tax laws should be used to subsidize specific economic sectors, thereby reducing revenue that could have been used for public services. But it’s tinged in irony.

The Department of Finance already publishes an annual report on tax expenditures, the latest of which indicates that they cost the state budget about $100 billion a year, with $76 billion of that from personal income taxes.

Corporate tax expenditures, the obvious target of SB 1349, are a relatively small $8.2 billion, including a series of tax credits for Southern California’s film and TV production industry. In fact, the Democratic legislators who sent SB 1349 to Newsom’s desk also voted for two bills that expand the credits the industry says are needed to prevent production from fleeing to other states.

Moreover, the vast majority of the loopholes in the finance department report were enacted during the last 60 years when Democrats dominated the Capitol. If SEIU and other advocates of closing them are looking for villains, they needn’t go far.

The history of one relatively tiny tax expenditure, enacted nearly 40 years ago, illustrates the irrational nature of tax policy.

While purchasers of off-the-shelf computer software on optical discs, such as the Quicken personal finance program, must pay sales taxes, custom software purchased by corporations is tax-free, thanks to a bill passed nearly 40 years ago.

The measure was sponsored by custom software makers and carried by a legislator from Silicon Valley. The finance department says it costs state and local governments $56 million a year.

Software delivered or accessed electronically, rather than physically, also has been tax-free, regardless of who is buying it. This year, the Legislature erased that loophole for “prewritten” software that individuals download, but didn’t touch the loophole for custom software. It also continued to exempt downloaded music, movies and games.

Taxing downloaded software is estimated to increase state revenue — and cost consumers — about $1 billion a year.

Unwarranted loopholes, such as the custom software tax exemption or the film industry tax credits, are welfare for the wealthy and should be closed as a matter of equity.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

California’s wildfire bills need water safeguards written into law

OPINION — The Trump administration is promoting the herbicide glyphosate as the U.S. Forest Service expands its use on California public lands. Now, wildfire bills could fast-track comparable herbicide-treatment projects without requiring baseline water testing or downstream monitoring.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Senate Bill 1370 would create a consolidated, expedited process for covered wildfire-mitigation projects. It would exempt covered projects from the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), California’s main environmental review law, and allow waivers of specified requirements.

Assembly Bill 2410 would exempt qualifying fuels-reduction projects from CEQA if they comply with the 2025 Statewide Fuels Reduction Environmental Protection Plan and specified conditions.

SB1370 excludes herbicide treatment from its covered-project pathway; AB 2410’s CEQA exemption does not itself establish uniform, water-specific safeguards wherever herbicide treatment is authorized.

California’s own record shows why lawmakers must require water safeguards before accelerating or exempting herbicide-treatment projects.

In July, the California Department of Pesticide Regulation (DPR) replaced — for the first time since 1991 — its method for determining which pesticides belong on its Groundwater Protection List, the registry that triggers formal follow-up when a pesticide is detected in groundwater. DPR’s rulemaking record shows it reviewed 480 chemicals, added 52 and removed 32.

Glyphosate and its primary breakdown product, aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), were not added. The published rulemaking record shows no glyphosate or AMPA evaluation under the new procedure; no score or reason appears.

This omission matters because glyphosate is widely used in California forests, aquatic areas, and watersheds draining to drinking-water sources; the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies herbicide runoff as a source in drinking water.

For listed pesticides, an unequivocal groundwater detection triggers a written determination within 90 days on whether it resulted from lawful agricultural use. Glyphosate and AMPA are unlisted. That requirement does not apply to them.

DPR’s 2024 annual report recorded glyphosate at 42 parts per billion — about 42 drops in 13,000 gallons — in a San Bernardino County agricultural well. The report compared it with California’s 700 parts per billion drinking-water limit and identified it as 1,200 times DPR’s lower screening level. The report states: “DPR will evaluate.” As of publication, I have found no posted evaluation or written determination.

California’s monitoring record shows repeated unanswered questions. DPR’s 2021 well-network update said it analyzed 59 Fresno and Tulare County wells with a Glyphosate Screen, with results due in 2023. The 2023 update had no screen results. DPR’s record offers no explanation.

Study 332, begun in November 2021 to characterize glyphosate movement through leaching-vulnerable California soils, was due in November 2022. DPR’s study page posts only the protocol; no results have been published.

DPR did not respond to multiple requests for comment about the missing screen, unpublished study, San Bernardino determination and glyphosate’s new-procedure score. Those unanswered questions matter because Trout Creek and the Upper Truckee River carry runoff from the Caldor Fire burn area in the Lake Tahoe Basin to the lake — a drinking-water source.

The 2021 Caldor Fire burned over 220,000 acres, threatening South Lake Tahoe and forcing evacuation. The Forest Service’s 11,700-acre project authorizes glyphosate treatment and restoration work within and adjacent to Trout Creek (a Lake Tahoe tributary); the decision documents identify no baseline water-monitoring requirement. The Forest Service cited the Williams, Kroes, and Munro review in its POEA (polyethoxylated tallow amine) and human-health analysis. The 2000 assessment concluded that glyphosate was safe for human health under expected conditions of use.

In November 2025, Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology retracted the review, citing undisclosed Monsanto co-writing, unpublished company studies, and serious ethical concerns about authorship. The Forest Service’s March 2026 Decision Notice retained the assessment.

Click  here to read the full article in the Capitol Weekly

How Many Legislative Committees and Bills Were There in the 2026 Session?

Do these committees author bill themselves?

Both Assembly and Senate Standing Committees do the bulk of the legislative work in the California Legislature. How many are there and what are their sizes? And do these committees author bill themselves? The following information is for the 2026 Legislative Session.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

How many Senate Standing Committees are there? 25

What is the average size of a Senate Standing Committee? 9

Which Senate Standing Committee has the most members? Budget with 18

Which Senate Standing Committee has the fewest members? There are seven committees with 5 members

Which Senators have the most committee assignments?

Senators Ochoa-Bogh and Seyarto with 8 each

Senators Caballero, Gonzalez, Grayson, Laird, Menjivar, Reyes, and Richardson have 7 each

What is the average number of committee assignments per Senator? 5

How many Senate Standing Committees authored bills? 12

How many total Senate committee bills were introduced? 157

How many Assembly Standing Committees are there? 32

What is the average size of an Assembly Standing Committee? 12

Which Assembly Standing Committee has the most members? Budget with 33

Click here to read the full article in the California Globe

 

Newsom signs 4 new California DUI laws. Advocates want more next session

Gov. Gavin Newsom on Friday signed into law four bills aimed at curbing a startling rise in DUI fatalities in recent years, including measures that make it easier to charge repeat drunk drivers with a felony and, if they kill someone, with murder.

The legislation follows a CalMatters series that revealed the state was unable — or unwilling — to get dangerous drivers off the road before it was too late. Many kept driving recklessly even after killing someone, and some even killed again.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The bills were the last ones standing from an initial package of 17 aimed at addressing traffic deaths. Most failed in the face of fierce opposition from progressive groups that argued increasing enforcement and penalties will disproportionately harm low-income and historically marginalized residents, and are not the best way to address traffic safety.

While some of the bills that passed were pared back during the legislative process, the new laws still notably increase potential penalties for repeat DUI offenders in a state that’s historically had some of the weakest DUI laws in the country.

“The fact that four bills got through to the finish line leaves me very hopeful that California is ready for change and sees the need to make the state safer,” said Jennifer Levi, whose 18-year-old son Braun was killed in May 2025 by a suspected drunk driver with a prior DUI arrest. “I have mixed emotions. My victory is the result of losing a child and I’d do anything in the world to have my son back alive with our family. But I cannot let this happen to other people.”

Levi became a fierce road safety advocate after her son’s death, working with Mothers Against Drunk Driving and pushing state leaders to act. She partnered with state Sen. Bob Archuleta, a Democrat from Norwalk on a bill to significantly increase criminal penalties for repeat drunk drivers. Archuleta’s own granddaughter was killed by a drunk driver. Levi said Newsom and his wife came to her home recently to mark the signing of the bill.

A photo, showing the smiling first couple along with Archuleta and Levi in her dining room, was included with the bill signing announcement.

The resulting law will make it easier to charge drunk drivers with murder if they have a prior DUI arrest – which had been difficult if the previous DUI charge had been pled down to a lesser crime. The law will also increase the criminal penalties for drivers who kill someone in a hit and run if they had a prior DUI at the time of the fatal crash.

“Having lost my granddaughter to a repeat drunk driver, this is personal. No family should have to endure what mine has, or what has happened to the Levi family,” said Archuleta, according to the statement announcing the bill signing. “Thank you to Governor Newsom for taking bold action to support families that have been devastated by drunk drivers. These are preventable tragedies. Nothing will ever bring my Samantha back or bring Braun back to the Levi family, but in signing SB 907 California is finally stepping up for victims.”

Other bills the governor signed included one from Assemblymember Nick Schultz, a Democrat from Burbank. That new law will allow prosecutors to charge a third DUI within 10 years as a felony. Previously, it wasn’t until a fourth DUI that law enforcement could seek the stiffer charges.

Newsom also signed into law two bills from Assemblymember Tom Lackey, a Republican from Palmdale who spent years working as a California Highway Patrol officer before joining the Legislature. One increases the points that most drivers convicted of killing someone while driving drunk get on their license from two to three. The bill initially would have increased the points for all vehicular manslaughter convictions and not just those involving intoxication, but it was watered down during the session. Lackey’s other successful bill requires the DMV to revoke a driver’s license for six years if they drive drunk and hurt someone after having four prior DUIs.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

Lawmakers unveil Hollywood tax incentive proposal

The stakes are high for the entertainment industry, which has been battered by years of work shifting to countries with lucrative tax credits.

Lawmakers introduced bipartisan legislation Thursday to create a federal tax incentive for film and television production, putting Donald Trump’s push to prop up Hollywood in front of Congress.

The stakes are high for the entertainment industry, which has been battered by years of work shifting to countries with lucrative tax credits. But the proposal could face resistance from conservatives wary of a new tax break — particularly one benefitting an industry centered in heavily Democratic California.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The effort involves an unlikely mix of figures — Sen. Adam Schiff and Rep. Laura Friedman of California, red-state lawmakers, Trump and the president’s Hollywood ambassador, Jon Voight. South Carolina Republican Tim Scott introduced the legislation in the Senate, while Texas Republican Nathaniel Moran did so in the House.

Congress should create the credit “immediately,” the president said on social media last month, arguing that too many productions have “moved to Canada, and other Countries, with very little work being done anymore in the United States. Hollywood is a Complete and Total Disaster!” he wrote.

Schiff, who was Democrats’ point person in Trump’s first impeachment trial, told reporters during a virtual news conference on Thursday that this was one time that he was happy to see a social media post from the president.

“Not something I say often, but I really was,” Schiff added. “I’m thrilled with his support for this.”

The bill’s introduction, industry boosters say, could one day be seen as a turning point for Hollywood: the start of a push to bring work back from the far-flung constellation of countries — Canada, Australia and the United Kingdom among them — that have long drawn film and TV production away from the U.S. Lawmakers aim to pass it during Congress’ lame-duck session after the November midterms.

The bipartisan support reflects a political reality: there are several production hubs in Republican-led states, among them Georgia and Louisiana. Roughly 40 states have their own production incentives, including California, which more than doubled its program last year to $750 million annually. But the state has continued to lose shoots to other locales, and Los Angeles County lost more than 42,000 film and television jobs between 2022 and 2024.

Click here to read the full article in Politico

L.A. approves $466 million in affordable housing spending, the largest pool ever

  • The L.A. City Council unanimously approved a record $466.6-million affordable housing funding round, backed largely by Measure ULA.
  • The money will support new construction and renovation projects, with recipients announced in February.

Los Angeles is set to go on an affordable housing spending spree.

On Tuesday, the City Council unanimously approved $466.6 million in funding that will be doled out to developers, nonprofits, land trusts and other organizations to build and renovate affordable housing.

The pool of money is the largest in the city housing department’s history, topping last year’s $387 million. Roughly 70% of the record budget will come from Measure ULA, the so-called mansion tax, which levies a 4% or 5.5% tax on L.A. property sales above $5.4 million.

Accountability was top of mind during Tuesday’s City Council meeting. The spending plan, which now awaits Mayor Karen Bass’ approval, includes an amendment requiring the housing department to provide quarterly updates on where the money is going, as well as project timelines and any significant delays or challenges.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

“We need to follow these dollars and make sure they’re producing the affordable housing Angelenos deserve,” Councilmember Imelda Padilla said at the meeting.

The funding should be a boon for L.A. developers, many of whom have stopped building multifamily projects because it’s hard to turn a profit — and many of whom blame Measure ULA for disincentivizing construction and decreasing the average sale price of multifamily units, which has dropped roughly 30% in L.A. County over the last five years.

Applications for the funds open Oct. 13 and close Dec. 4. The housing department will announce the recipients in February.

Last year, the city awarded $360.9 million to 80 projects that promise the construction of 1,288 new affordable units and the preservation of 3,713 units, mostly clustered around downtown L.A., South L.A. and Koreatown, with several others in San Pedro and the San Fernando Valley.

Not all the money from last year was allocated; roughly $30 million is being rolled over into the new funding round.

Of this year’s pool, $123 million will go toward multifamily affordable housing with 40 or more units, and $115 million will go toward projects seeking low-income housing tax credits.

There’s also $104 million for alternative models of new construction, $38 million for stabilizing existing affordable housing, $32 million for acquiring and rehabbing affordable units, $27 million for preserving existing units and $25 million for preserving units facing financial challenges.

“LAHD is very excited about the opportunities … to produce more affordable housing and stabilize the city’s housing stock,” said Tiena Johnson Hall, the housing department’s general manager. “This is a unique opportunity and will create real and sustainable change in the affordable housing landscape.”

Councilmember Ysabel Jurado, who is chair of the newly created Homelessness and Health Committee, said the money will help working families, senior citizens and people with disabilities stay in the neighborhoods they call home. She credited Measure ULA for “turning the will of Los Angeles voters into concrete solutions that build and preserve affordable housing.”

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

‘Very dangerous’ hurricane in the Pacific explodes into Cat-5 monster as it moves towards SoCal

Southern California could face dangerous surf and rip currents from Hurricane Polo after the Pacific storm grew into a Category 5 monster overnight.

Polo was packing maximum sustained winds of 160 mph as of 6 a.m. Tuesday, after undergoing a period of rapid strengthening, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.

The hurricane was roughly 220 miles south of Zihuatanejo in the Mexican state of Guerrero. The dramatic escalation occurred after Polo had strengthened from a tropical storm into a Category 1 hurricane Monday afternoon.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

While the hurricane itself is expected to remain offshore, its effects could begin reaching Southern California by the weekend, bringing strong swells, tropical humidity and potentially dangerous rip currents.

The threat comes just weeks after Hurricane Marie battered the California coast with flooding and high tides, and as the state prepares for what officials have warned could be a historic El Niño season.

Gov. Gavin Newsom declared a statewide emergency Monday, allowing agencies to prepare vulnerable communities, roads and critical infrastructure, as well as stage emergency supplies ahead of potentially destructive winter weather.

Exactly where Polo goes next remains uncertain.

Forecasting models reviewed by the Daily Mail show several possible routes for the storm or its remnants over the next seven to 10 days, though only a small number of models see Polo’s center heading toward California.

Other projections show tropical moisture potentially moving into Arizona and New Mexico next week, while Texas remains a more distant possibility, the outlet reported.

Meteorologist Ross Ellet of 13ABC said most models still steer Polo away from the US.

“While a few models have this storm turning into the Gulf of California, and possibly into the Southwestern part of the US, most weather maps push this storm northwest away from land,” Ellet said. “This will need to be watched in the days ahead.”

Click here to read the full article in the California Post