Water guzzlers would be punished under state proposal

As reported by the SF Chronicle:

Thank you for reading this post, don't forget to subscribe!

California officials seeking to cut urban water use by 25 percent amid the punishing drought said Tuesday that the best way to get the job done is to spread the hurt unevenly, slapping the biggest guzzling communities with mandatory cuts up to 35 percent.

This means leafy towns on the Peninsula and a handful of faraway suburbs, where tall trees hover and big lawns rule, would have to make the Bay Area’s largest concessions. The plan is to go easier on places like San Francisco that already consume relatively little water on a per capita basis.

While warm Southern California enclaves such as Palm Springs and Beverly Hills, alongside Central Valley cities like Bakersfield, dominate the state’s list of heavy water users, Northern California spots such as Hillsborough, Atherton, Portola Valley, Woodside and Menlo Park also rank high in per capita water use. Consequently, they would be targeted for the strictest cuts on the state’s proposed 10- to 35-percent sliding scale of reductions.

Click here to read the full article


  1. And you know that they, and they’re buddies are going to be exempt from the rules. I’d love to be in the fire dept and have their houses burning down and tell them ” Sorry, we can’t waste the water to save your house”.

Speak Your Mind


WP2Social Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com