Bass comes from behind, now in dead heat with Raman in mayor’s race, new poll shows

  • Raman and Bass are tied with support from 40% of likely L.A. voters heading into the Nov. 3 election, according to the Berkeley IGS/L.A. Times poll.
  • Most of Bass’ come-from-behind surge is the result of her winning over voters who cast their ballot for Spencer Pratt in the June primary, the poll showed.

The race for mayor of Los Angeles is a dead heat as the campaign draws to a close, with a new poll showing incumbent Karen Bass erasing the double-digit lead previously held by Councilmember Nithya Raman.

Raman and Bass now each have 40% of likely L.A. voters in their camps, with 19% still undecided ahead of the Nov. 3 election, according to the UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll, co-sponsored by The Times.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The neck-and-neck contest is a big change from September, when Raman jumped out to an 11-percentage-point lead with support from 39% of likely voters compared with Bass at 28%.

It follows weeks of relentless attacks on Raman by Bass, whom some analysts had predicted would need to campaign more aggressively to close the gap with her challenger.

“It’s certainly a breath of fresh air for Bass to see the race close. She’ll probably feel the campaign is having the effect she wants it to have, which is to put more focus on Raman and put Raman on the defensive,” said Mark DiCamillo, the director of the Berkeley IGS Poll.

The survey released Wednesday was conducted online in English and Spanish with a sample of 2,197 likely city voters between Oct. 19 and Oct. 25. It has a margin of error of about three percentage points.

“The momentum in this race is with Karen Bass,” said Alex Stack, a spokesperson for Bass’ campaign. “Ever since Angelenos got their ballots, Nithya Raman has made headlines for all the wrong reasons — voters know they can’t trust her on public safety and other key issues.”

The Raman campaign cited high unfavorable numbers for Bass in the poll, and noted that the mayor “still can’t get ahead” in voter surveys.

“Bass hasn’t led a poll since August and an aggregate of all publicly available polls continues to show Nithya in the lead,” the Raman campaign said in a news release.

The leveling off of the race, along with the sharp decline in undecided voters, was spurred largely by conservative voters who chose Republican Spencer Pratt in the primary deciding to vote for the mayor in the runoff, said DiCamillo.

In the September Berkeley IGS/L.A. Times poll, 22% of Pratt voters said they planned to support Bass, while 16% said they favored Raman. That left a whopping 63% of Pratt voters undecided still.

In the new poll, Bass shot up to 41% of the Pratt vote, while Raman dropped to 14% and 45% were still undecided. Pratt hasn’t endorsed either candidate in the race and continues to bash both Raman and Bass on social media.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

LAPD chief becomes polarizing figure as Bass and Raman diverge on handling of police

  • Mayor Karen Bass has publicly backed LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell, saying the Police Department could be thrown into disarray if he is removed before the 2028 Olympic Games.
  • Nithya Raman has called for a change in LAPD leadership without giving a clear timeline of when she would replace McDonnell if she defeats Bass in the upcoming mayoral election.
  • Bass selected McDonnell to lead the LAPD in 2024. His supporters say he has managed to steady a department beset by low morale, and that crime has fallen during his tenure. He has taken criticism for shootings by police officers and the use of aggressive tactics against protesters.

In the race to become L.A.’s next mayor, the city’s top cop — LAPD Chief Jim McDonnell — has become a lightning rod for debate.

The two candidates — incumbent Karen Bass and City Councilmember Nithya Raman — have staked out differing positions about how the Los Angeles Police Department has performed under McDonnell.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Raman has vowed to replace McDonnell, saying he has not “met the moment” given the department’s response to federal immigration raids. Bass has publicly backed the chief she hired two years ago, saying the LAPD could be thrown into disarray if McDonnell is removed before the 2028 Olympic Games.

Raman’s potential ouster of McDonnell and desire to push reforms on the LAPD has pitted her against the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the powerful union for rank-and-file officers that campaigned against Bass during her first election but is now backing her. The union has poured millions of dollars into attack ads against Raman, who has said she declined contributions from the organization in the past.

In an op-ed published in the Protective League’s monthly magazine earlier this year, union president Richard Mendoza called the Democratic Socialists of America, which has endorsed Raman, an “imminent threat to our members.”

Last week, Raman faced criticism for an Instagram video in which she appeared to slam McDonnell and the mayor, saying at one point “only you can stop fascist liars.” She later denied that she was referring to Bass or McDonnell, saying her remarks were improperly edited — and that she had the video pulled.

The Raman campaign did not respond to numerous requests for an interview about her vision for the LAPD.

Raman, a Harvard-educated urban planner, has sought to burnish her credentials as a political outsider by publicly calling for a change in LAPD leadership — but she hasn’t given a clear timeline on when she would replace McDonnell.

Click here to read the full article at the LA Times

Seeking reelection, L.A. Mayor Bass calls herself ‘an activist fighting for change’

Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass, 72, is seeking a second term in the Nov. 3 election, after being forced into a runoff by City Councilmember Nithya Raman, a onetime ally.

A former state Assembly speaker and member of Congress, Bass became the city’s first female mayor in 2022, when she defeated billionaire developer Rick Caruso.

Once in office, she focused much of her energy on reducing homelessness and bolstering the ranks of the Los Angeles Police Department. In 2025, she faced sharp criticism over the city’s response to the January Palisades fire, and for being in Ghana when the fire began amid high wind warnings.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The Times spoke with her on the seventh floor of an apartment building under construction in West Los Angeles — one made possible by her order fast-tracking approval of affordable housing. The interview has been edited for length and clarity.

The Times: What is your single biggest accomplishment as mayor?

Bass: Well, it’s hard for me to narrow it to just one. But I do think this [building] is a perfect example of a huge accomplishment, which is affordable housing. And the fact that we have built more affordable housing in the four years that I’ve been mayor than was built many, many years before.

Really, the accomplishment was changing the rules and expediting [affordable] housing.

The Times: And what would you say is the biggest mistake you made while serving as mayor?

Bass: No question. Not being here for the fire, and being out of the country.

The Times: Why, or how, do you think that happened?

Bass: How do I think it happened that I was out of the country?

The Times: There were warnings about wind. There was concern about fire risk. Some on your staff received those warnings.

Bass: It happened in the city and in the county, that there were warnings. But no one thought those warnings elevated to a point of a crisis, or an impending crisis.

What you know about weather events is, any time we think there’s going to be a major concern, everybody comes together. There’s press conferences, there’s briefings, and the public is informed about what could possibly happen. That was not done in the city. That was not done in the county.

And when I came back and spoke to [then-Fire Chief Kristin Crowley] and said, “Why didn’t you raise the alarm?” — because she had done that for previous emergencies — she basically said, “Mayor, we get Santa Ana winds all the time. We just didn’t think it was going to be that bad.”

[Crowley has sued Bass, accusing her of defamation and damaging her reputation for her remarks about the Palisades fire response.]

So the bottom line is, I was not aware, otherwise I would have not left the country. However, it’s no excuse. The bottom line is, I wasn’t here when the city needed me. And that’s a pain point for me, that I was not where I should have been, where I was needed.

I always do the analogy of, if you’re out of town and a family member is hurt or sick, it doesn’t matter where you are or why you were out of town. What matters is you weren’t there when your family needed it. And the city is my family.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Top-two race in Los Angeles makes strange political bedfellows

Rules governing elections are generating novel possible outcomes in the races for California’s two top executive offices — the governorship and the mayoralty of Los Angeles — and in LA they’re producing strange bedfellows as well.

At the state level, attention has centered around the possibility that two Republicans could emerge as top finishers in the June primary, a mathematically possible if politically unlikely scenario. It’s the result of the state’s top-two system, in which the two top vote getters in the primary automatically move to the runoff in November. 

Democrats generally prosper by that system since the state is overwhelmingly Democratic, but with two Republicans and eight Democrats on the ballot, there is an opportunity for the GOP to contend for an office that normal circumstances would place well out of its reach. Faced with that possibility, low-polling Democrats are being pressed to drop out, and some pundits are giving up on the top-two system altogether. 

In Los Angeles, meanwhile, the city’s election system has opened an unusual path for Mayor Karen Bass — if she uses more of her resources to boost the signal of a fringe candidate in order to clear the field of more serious opponents. 

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

That’s a high-risk gambit that could either give her the opponent she wants or it could antagonize and fracture her support.

The rules and strategies for Los Angeles municipal elections are different from those at the state level, so these two races are not mirrors of each other. Start with the fact that the June municipal election is not a primary. It’s an actual election: If any candidate for mayor (or any other city office) wins more than 50% of the votes cast in June, that candidate wins. There’s no November runoff.

The city race also is different from the governor’s in that Los Angeles has an incumbent, Bass, who won comfortably four years ago. For challengers, that makes the campaign for mayor in some ways more difficult than the one for governor. Bass is weaker than she was four years ago, but she’s still mayor and has a strong core of support.

And finally, Los Angeles is different from California because LA is even more liberal than the state whose politics it anchors. In the runup to LA’s filing deadline, potential office-seekers to Bass’ political right melted away. But that wasn’t the real threat to her anyway. 

Instead, Bass is facing two candidates to her political left — City Councilmember Nithya Raman and community organizer Rae Huang — as well as one to her right, MAGA favorite and former TV personality Spencer Pratt, as well as a smattering of others, including tech entrepreneur Adam Miller, who has told supporters he is prepared to loan his campaign more than $2 million of his own money.

That field includes much for Bass to be relieved about. It lacks a well-financed, high-profile challenger, and it features her in the top spot. One poll earlier this week showed her in second place, but it’s an outlier. She leads in all others, though not commandingly. 

But the field also exposes a potential vulnerability. The city’s political center of gravity may be shifting so rapidly that Bass, the first Black woman to hold the office and a veteran Democrat, may be too conservative for the city she governs. Add that to general voter dissatisfaction with her handling of the Palisades fire and its aftermath, and Bass could face a genuine threat from Raman, the most credible of her opponents.

As the various campaigns elbow toward the June 2 showdown, the city’s elections rules and its political demographics do provide Bass with an unusual, if controversial, option:  Either her campaign or one of her backers could spend heavily to raise Pratt’s profile, hoping that with Bass’ help he could edge out Raman and face Bass in a runoff.

Click here to read the full article in CalMatters

A political earthquake in mayor’s race makes election a referendum on L.A.’s future

  • Raman’s candidacy raises the question of whether L.A. is ready to move further in the direction of New York City, which just elected the ultra-progressive Zohran Mamdani as mayor.
  • Raman and Bass have largely been allies and have endorsed each other’s reelection bids.

L.A. Mayor Karen Bass was having a really bad week.

But then it turned into a pretty good week, and she must have breathed a sigh of relief.

Until the Saturday morning surprise.

I had to set fire to my scorecard, and to the column I had just drafted, which touched on all the expected big-name challengers who had bowed out of the mayoral race in the past several days: L.A. County Supervisor Lindsey Horvath, billionaire businessman Rick Caruso (who forced a runoff with Bass the last time around), and former L.A. Unified schools chief Austin Beutner.

It was looking as though we wouldn’t get a badly needed, monthslong, toe-to-toe face-off about all that’s right and wrong in the sprawling metropolis of high hopes and low expectations. In a conversation I had with Loyola Marymount University’s Fernando Guerra, a decades-long observer of the local political scene, he made this observation about the dull political season that was shaping up:

“What is interesting to me is that no one from the establishment political class is running against [Bass] when she is clearly vulnerable.”

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Vulnerable because of her handling of the Palisades fire and its aftermath.

Vulnerable because of limited progress on core issues such as homelessness, housing affordability and the shameful condition of streets, sidewalks and parks.

But then came Saturday morning, when, in an unexpected move, L.A. City Councilmember Nithya Raman decided to step up, injecting a new element of drama into the race.

It was a surprise because Raman and Bass are not political enemies. In fact, they’ve largely been allies and have endorsed each other’s reelection bids.

So what was Raman thinking in signing up for a challenge in which she is clearly the underdog?

“I have deep respect for Mayor Bass. We’ve worked closely together on my biggest priorities and her biggest priorities, and there’s significant alignment there,” Raman told The Times. “But over the last few months in particular, I’ve really begun to feel like unless we have some big changes in how we do things in Los Angeles, that the things we count on are not going to function anymore.”

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Looking good for Kamala Harris, not so much for Karen Bass, poll shows

California voters have sharply differing views over two of the state’s most prominent Democrats, according to a new poll.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

Former Vice President Kamala Harris, who is expected to decide by the end of the summer whether she runs for California governor in 2026, has near universal name recognition among California voters, and 50% view her favorably, according to a survey by UC Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies that was co-sponsored by The Times.

In contrast, California voters, notably residents of the city of Los Angeles, are more likely to view Mayor Karen Bass unfavorably. In the aftermath of the devastating fires in Altadena and Pacific Palisades earlier this year and criticism of the city’s response, Bass’ approval ratings are dire among Angelenos, who are overwhelmingly Democratic. Voters’ unhappiness with the mayor could create difficulties for her reelection campaign next year if the mood persists.

“When you’re underwater and almost universally known — 82% of voters can offer an opinion of Bass in Los Angeles city — one of the hardest things to overcome is an accumulated negative image,” said Mark DiCamillo, director of the IGS poll. “Once you develop an unfavorable image, it’s hard to overcome. It almost requires another major event she can take credit for or look good in handling.”

The Democrats are longtime allies — Harris swore Bass in when she was elected mayor of Los Angeles in 2022 after defeating real estate developer Rick Caruso by nearly 10 points.

Both women were among the elected officials vetted to be Joe Biden’s running mate in the 2020 election. Harris ultimately prevailed, was elected vice president and then became the Democratic presidential nominee in 2024 after Biden decided not to run for reelection.

But California voters have strikingly different thoughts about the veteran elected officials.

Perceptions of Bass, a longtime member of Congress and the state Legislature, have faltered in the aftermath of the fires — a notable reversal among Californians who were optimistic about her prospects shortly before she won the mayoral election in 2022.

In October of that year, 50% of likely voters in Los Angeles had a positive opinion of Bass, while 35% had a negative view, according to a UC Berkeley/Times poll conducted at the time.

Now, half of the city’s voters surveyed perceive her negatively, while 32% have a favorable impression, according to the new poll. In Los Angeles, with the exception of Black voters and senior citizens, Bass is viewed more unfavorably than positively among voters of every other age group, and men and women. Statewide, 42% of voters do not have a favorable view of Bass, who is facing a recall effort that is unlikely to make the ballot. Only 1 in 5 (19%) give her high marks.

Harris, despite losing the presidential election to Donald Trump in 2024, is faring better than Bass among California voters as she weighs a gubernatorial bid next year to replace Gov. Gavin Newsom, who cannot run for the seat again because of term limits.

Roughly 96% of California voters know enough about Harris to have an opinion about her, according to the poll. That’s a stratospheric level of name identification in an enormous state where lesser-known candidates must spend tens of millions of dollars in hopes of raising their profile.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

With L.A. in crisis, Mayor Karen Bass’ hiring goal for the LAPD slips further out of reach

Two years ago, Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass laid out an ambitious and expensive goal for her first city budget: restore the size of the Los Angeles Police Department to 9,500 officers.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

At the time, the LAPD was struggling with recruitment, and Bass — just four months into her job — openly worried the department would soon fall below 9,000.

Now, the mayor’s hiring goal looks even more out of reach. With the city battered by a budget crisis and homicides falling by double digits, some are wondering: just how low can, or should, LAPD staffing go?

On Thursday, the City Council’s budget committee provided a short-term answer, moving forward with a plan to cut the LAPD by another 300 officers — not through layoffs, but simply by slowing down recruitment. Such a move would leave the department with 8,400 officers by June 2026, down from about 8,700 this year and 10,000 five years ago.

The slowdown, if approved by the City Council later this month, would free up $9.5 million, helping the city save some of the civilian workers at the LAPD whose jobs are among the 1,600 targeted for elimination in the mayor’s proposed budget.

But that wasn’t the end of it. Faced with a nearly $1-billion shortfall and several years of financial turmoil ahead, the five-member committee obtained an analysis from the city’s policy experts showing how much could be saved if the LAPD ramps down hiring even more, and for a longer period of time.

The answer? $385 million over five years, if the LAPD cuts the mayor’s police hiring plan for 2025-26 by 75%. Under that scenario, the department would bring on just 120 recruits per year — far fewer than the number who resign or retire — leaving slightly more than 6,600 police officers by 2030.

Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez, an outspoken opponent of police spending who sits on the budget committee, requested the analysis. She was one of three council members who voted against Bass’ budget last year, arguing that too much money went to the LAPD and not enough to departments that provide other critical city services.

The four-page analysis handed Hernandez and her allies, who have long called on the city to shift funds away from police, a road map for driving down police spending over the long term.

Hernandez, in an interview, called the committee’s decision to cut police hiring in half over the coming year — taking Bass’ proposal for 480 recruits down to 240 — a good start. She sounded intrigued by the numbers laid out in the analysis, saying it “lays out a very clear pathway” for future budget deliberations.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Mayor Bass said her office’s budget will be cut. The numbers tell a different story

When Mayor Karen Bass spoke about budget cuts during her State of the City address — before she even mentioned laying off city employees — she made clear that her own office would not be spared.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

It seemed like a solidarity-building pledge — like a captain going down with the ship.

“We reduced funding for the mayor’s office,” she said in the April 21 speech.

This is my third week covering City Hall for The Times. It’s my first budget season (my colleague David Zahniser has been covering L.A. city budgets since I was 6), and it’s a doozy. The city is facing a $1-billion shortfall caused in large part by rising personnel costs, soaring legal payouts and a slowdown in the local economy.

When I heard the mayor’s words, I made a reasonable assumption — that the operating budget for her office would decrease from the year before.

I was incorrect.

When the mayor released her proposed budget later that day, I turned to the section for her office, only to find, to my confusion, that it had grown — from $10.1 million in fiscal year 2024-2025 to $10.7 million in 2025-2026. The office was also spared from having to lay off a single member of its 94-person team, even while Bass was proposing 1,650 layoffs elsewhere in city government.

So by what logic could the mayor’s office still have reduced its funding?

Zach Seidl, deputy mayor of communications, said the city administrative officer’s recalculation of the coming fiscal year’s budget actually showed a $1.2-million decrease. Employees in the mayor’s office are not getting regularly scheduled cost-of-living raises. The first, coming in June, would have been a 4% increase. The next, in December, would have been another 2% increase. And the final one in June 2026 would have been another 4%.

Seidl said that while the proposed budget for the mayor’s office is higher than last year, it is reduced from where it could have been if the raises had gone into effect. He called this a 10% cut to the office.

Some outside of the mayor’s office were less convinced by the what-goes-up-has-gone-down explanation.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Steve Soboroff bows out as L.A. fire recovery czar, with some parting shots

In his last week as L.A.’s fire recovery czar, Steve Soboroff said he was shut out of high-level planning almost from the start, raising questions about why Mayor Karen Bass chose him and whether rebuilding from the Palisades fire is on track.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

The idiosyncratic longtime civic leader, who has a penchant for speaking his mind and little patience for stuffed-shirt protocol, was hired for a three-month term at a salary of $500,000, to be funded by nonprofits. But Soboroff agreed to work for free after searing rebukes from Pacific Palisades residents and others.

Soboroff — whose position was announced with fanfare in mid-January — was initially tasked with creating a comprehensive strategy for rebuilding, but his role was soon dramatically scaled back.

“They haven’t asked me to do anything in a month and a half, nothing, zero,” Soboroff said Tuesday in a free-wheeling, 90-minute exit interview with The Times.

But, he insisted, he has still worked long hours helping the Palisades rebuild from a fire that killed 12 people and destroyed nearly 7,000 homes and other structures. He has functioned as a fixer of sorts, drawing on his long history as a developer and his bulging Rolodex to connect people, while remaining a frequent presence in the community.

A sign of his exclusion from Bass’ inner circle came within two weeks of his appointment, when the mayor neglected to inform him of her decision to reopen the Palisades to the public. When reached by a reporter, Soboroff was unaware of the reopening plans, then candidly expressed his disapproval — a highly unusual move for a mayoral appointee. Bass reversed her decision the next day, amid criticism from City Councilmember Traci Park and others.

“I have known Steve for years and years, and he’s not going to be that far away, so he knows I will stay in contact,” Bass said Thursday at a public event in Pacific Palisades that Soboroff was not invited to take part in. Soboroff “laid a great foundation” in his role, she said.

He said he doesn’t know why he was shut out of city recovery planning, though it was “possible” that the mayor’s office found him “too aggressive.” He said he was open to an extension beyond his 90-day contract.

“I wasn’t invited to press conferences either,” Soboroff said. “People say, ‘Well, why aren’t you offended?’ Because I was too f— busy. I had to do all that, and I don’t care who took credit for it, but I had to do it, because it wouldn’t have gotten done.”

Soboroff said he helped coordinate on-the-ground efforts with the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers, brought in mental health experts and fixed problems as they arose, such as helping to broker the deal for Palisades Charter High School’s temporary relocation to the former Sears building in Santa Monica.

On Thursday evening, Bass spokesperson Zach Seidl said: “At times Steve sent confusing messages to residents but we are grateful for his service and contributions. The bottom line is this: Mayor Bass is on track to deliver the fastest disaster cleanup effort in California history.”

Soboroff, who ran unsuccessfully for mayor in 2001 and was a strong supporter of Bass during her 2022 election, raised his family in the Palisades. He helped bring Crypto.com Arena (formerly Staples Center) to downtown Los Angeles and piloted the development of Playa Vista. He also served on the Police Commission and other city commissions.

Soboroff said he now wonders whether the mayor wanted someone of his demographic — an older, white developer with longtime relationships in affluent Los Angeles — to provide political cover in the Palisades, a wealthy, majority white neighborhood that heavily favored her opponent, billionaire developer Rick Caruso, in the 2022 election.

After the uproar over his salary, Soboroff vented his frustrations at a private event at the tony Harvard-Westlake School, saying he was lied to. Soboroff walked back the comments after an audio recording of his appearance reached the press.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times

Mayor Karen Bass looks vulnerable, but is anyone up to challenge her in 2026?

Mayor Karen Bass appeared to be on the path to an easy reelection, with no serious challengers in sight after a relatively drama-free first two years in office.

Click Here to Subscribe to the California Political Review

But that was before a wildfire annihilated swaths of Pacific Palisades, putting Bass’ leadership under a national microscope, and before the city slid into a major financial crisis, with Bass searching for cuts to close a nearly $1-billion budget gap.

Now, the first-term mayor is markedly more vulnerable. The chattering among the city’s political class about potential competitors has grown louder. But it’s unclear whether anyone will mount a serious challenge to an incumbent who still wields considerable clout.

“You’re only actually vulnerable if a viable candidate runs against you,” said Sara Sadhwani, an assistant professor of politics at Pomona College. “Right now, we don’t see who that viable candidate would be.”

The $108-million question remains whether Bass’ frequent antagonist and former opponent Rick Caruso will challenge her again. Caruso, who was at times more visible after the Jan. 7 fire than the mayor, spent unprecedented sums of his personal fortune in the 2022 race, only to lose to Bass by nearly 10 points.

The developer has intimated that he’s weighing a run for either mayor or governor — or might sit out the next cycle. His deep pockets give him the luxury of avoiding a decision until he absolutely has to, meaning he could wait until early 2026 before entering the fray.

A number of other names keep coming up in political circles, though none have said they plan to run, and several have swatted away the idea.

The list includes Councilmember Monica Rodriguez, an iconoclastic force who has been sharply critical of the mayor’s initiatives; Councilmember Traci Park, who represents the Palisades and has become something of a folk hero in her district since the fire; and City Controller Kenneth Mejia, who waged an insurgent leftist campaign in 2022 and has been fiercely outspoken on the reasons for the city’s financial crisis.

Some political insiders have raised the possibility of another maverick, business-friendly candidate emerging from outside the system, though few of the names floated seem particularly realistic.

The June primary is still 14 months away, an eternity in politics. Time might heal all wounds for the embattled mayor, and the Democratic Party establishment could recircle the wagons around her like it did in 2022. Or she could stumble further.

As a candidate, Bass made homelessness her signature issue, pledging to move people off L.A.’s streets and into housing. Although she has made progress on that front, Los Angeles County’s recent decision to pull more than $300 million out of the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority will complicate her efforts.

In any case, it may be recovery from the fire — and not homelessness — that defines Bass’ legacy. Many Angelenos expressed dissatisfaction with her early fire response, with less than 1 in 5 characterizing it as good or excellent, according to a UC Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies poll, co-sponsored by The Times, conducted in late February.

The mayor drew public ire for traveling out of the country before the fires exploded, taking a diplomatic trip to Ghana despite warnings of severe winds. She floundered when initially asked about her trip, faced criticism from her fire chief — whom she later ousted — and appeared to be out of sync with her own recovery czar.

Bass is also facing a recall attempt, though it will be a steep climb for organizers to collect enough signatures to force a vote.

Bass’ political consultant, Doug Herman, said the mayor remains “laser-focused on delivering results for this city.”

“Mayor Bass is continuing to lead with drops in crime, the first decrease in homelessness in years and is currently turning Los Angeles around from the devastating wildfires with one of the fastest recovery and rebuilding efforts in modern California history,” he said.

Several polls have been circulated to voters in recent weeks, asking what they think of Bass’ performance and how they would rate a number of potential candidates for mayor, including Rodriguez, Park, Caruso and Bass. It’s unclear who paid to put each poll in the field.

Caruso, a billionaire mall mogul, said through a spokesperson that he is “wholly focused” on rebuilding work through his nonprofit Steadfast LA — and has yet to make any decision about his political future. But he brought on veteran Democratic political consultant Eric Koch in January to do communications for him and is thought to be behind at least one of the recent polls.

Bass handily vanquished Caruso in 2022, after branding him as a Republican. It’s unclear how that line of attack will play four years later, with the city still in recovery mode and Angelenos feeling far more frustration toward the incumbent mayor.

But Angelenos’ fury toward President Trump could also hurt Caruso, who only registered as a Democrat in January 2022, less than a month before filing to run in that year’s mayoral election.

Regardless, Bass will have one major advantage she didn’t have the last go-round: support from the Los Angeles Police Protective League, the union that represents rank-and-file LAPD officers, which backed Caruso last time.

The union’s campaign committee spent more than $3 million attacking Bass in 2022. Now, the union credits the mayor, along with its police officers, with driving down the number of homicides, burglaries and shootings across the city.

“The Los Angeles Police Protective League enthusiastically endorses Mayor Karen Bass for reelection, and we look forward to ensuring the residents of our city know that this mayor has an unwavering commitment to keep Angelenos and police officers safe,” the league’s board said in a statement.

For Bass, the most dangerous scenario would be a contest with multiple credible challengers. Mayor James K. Hahn faced that situation during the 2005 primary election and went on to lose in a landslide to then-Councilmember Antonio Villaraigosa.

Mejia said through a representative that he has no interest in running for mayor at this time. He recently formed a campaign committee to run for a second term as controller in 2026.

Park, who is also seeking reelection, has told Bass that she has no plans to run against her.

“The council member has made it clear that she needs to be with her constituents at this time of crisis in her district,” said Park spokesperson Pete Brown.

As of early April, two people had filed paperwork to challenge Bass: Vincent Wali and Asaad Y. Alnajjar. Wali has little public profile, and Alnajjar is a longtime city engineer.

“The real question is, if [Caruso] doesn’t run, can someone fill that void. … People are clearly looking at what is the sort of moderate to right lane to challenge her,” said Mike Bonin, a progressive former City Council member and the incoming executive director of the Pat Brown Institute for Public Affairs at Cal State Los Angeles.

Click here to read the full article in the LA Times